本文選題：責(zé)令性行政行為　切入點：法律性質(zhì)　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：責(zé)令改正、責(zé)令停產(chǎn)停業(yè)整頓、責(zé)令停止違法行為這類規(guī)定廣泛存在于現(xiàn)存的法律法規(guī)中,但是學(xué)界并沒有對其進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的研究,對此類規(guī)定的定義、分類也都沒有一致的觀點,在法律法規(guī)中的存在形式也是多種多樣。本文將此類規(guī)定統(tǒng)稱為責(zé)令性行政行為。近年來,人民群眾法律常識普及度提高,人們的維權(quán)意識增強,行政復(fù)議、行政訴訟的案件數(shù)量急劇增加。在嚴(yán)格限制公權(quán)力使用的趨勢下,規(guī)范行政機關(guān)的行政執(zhí)法行為勢在必行。如何做到執(zhí)法規(guī)范嚴(yán)謹(jǐn)就使得這些之前并不被大家注意到的責(zé)令性行政行為的法律性質(zhì)被更多的關(guān)注。正因為現(xiàn)行法律對責(zé)令性行政行為的規(guī)定缺乏系統(tǒng)性和明確性,學(xué)界對其研究也并不多,導(dǎo)致了行政機關(guān)在行政執(zhí)法過程中保證程序合法、法律適用準(zhǔn)確面臨巨大的挑戰(zhàn)。本文即對這類責(zé)令性行政行為進(jìn)行分析研究,梳理歸類,通過特征比較對不同的責(zé)令性行政行為的法律性質(zhì)進(jìn)行論述。文章共五個部分,第一部分簡要論述責(zé)令性行政行為的概念及衍變。第二部分對責(zé)令性行政行為進(jìn)行梳理。以滎陽市一級權(quán)責(zé)清單為依據(jù),對現(xiàn)行法律法規(guī)中存在的責(zé)令性行政行為進(jìn)行梳理,分析責(zé)令性行政行為在不同領(lǐng)域之間所占比重以及在同一領(lǐng)域中的權(quán)責(zé)事項中所占比重;并在此基礎(chǔ)上,根據(jù)文意表述、條文結(jié)構(gòu)等對責(zé)令性行政行為進(jìn)行分析歸類。第三部分是責(zé)令性行政行為存在的問題,此類問題多為共性問題或較多存在的。第四部分對梳理中出現(xiàn)頻次最高的六類責(zé)令性行政行為:責(zé)令改正、責(zé)令停產(chǎn)停整頓、責(zé)令停止違法行為、責(zé)令限期拆除、責(zé)令恢復(fù)原狀、責(zé)令賠償損失進(jìn)行法律性質(zhì)分析,結(jié)合案例進(jìn)行論證,并對問題的解決進(jìn)行探討。最后一部分對責(zé)令性行政行為的制度完善提出建議。
[Abstract]:Such provisions as ordering rectification, suspension of production and suspension of business and rectification, ordering to stop illegal acts are widely found in existing laws and regulations, but the academic circles have not systematically studied and defined such provisions. There is also no consistent view of classification, and there are various forms of existence in laws and regulations. This article refers to such provisions as mandatory administrative acts. In recent years, the popularization of legal common sense among the people has increased, and people's awareness of safeguarding their rights has increased. Administrative reconsideration, the number of cases in administrative proceedings has increased dramatically. Under the trend of strict restrictions on the use of public power, It is imperative to standardize the administrative law enforcement behavior of administrative organs. How to enforce the law strictly and strictly makes the legal nature of the ordered administrative act that has not been noticed by everybody to be paid more attention to. Precisely because of the current law. Lack of systematicness and clarity in the provisions of mandatory administrative acts, There is not much academic research on it, which leads to the administrative organs in the process of administrative law enforcement to ensure that the procedure is legal, the application of the law is facing a huge challenge. This paper analyzes and classifies this kind of mandatory administrative behavior. The legal nature of different mandatory administrative acts is discussed through the comparison of characteristics. There are five parts in the article. The first part briefly discusses the concept and evolution of the ordered administrative act. The second part combs the ordered administrative act. Based on the list of powers and responsibilities of Xingyang City, the author sorts out the existing mandatory administrative act in the current laws and regulations. To analyze the proportion of mandatory administrative acts in different fields and the proportion of rights and responsibilities in the same field; and on the basis of this, to express according to the literature and meaning, The third part is about the problems existing in the ordered administrative act, Most of these problems are common problems or more existing. Part 4th has six kinds of ordered administrative acts with the highest frequency in combing: order to correct, order to stop production and stop rectification, order to stop illegal acts, and order to dismantle within a time limit. In the last part, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of the ordered administrative behavior, including the analysis of the legal nature of the compensation for the loss, the demonstration of the case, and the discussion of the solution of the problem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭林將;;行政責(zé)令行為的規(guī)范分析與制度完善——基于浙江省行政權(quán)力清單的梳理[J];法治研究;2016年02期

2 曾冰;;責(zé)令性行政行為法律屬性研究及立法完善——以類型化思維為視角[J];南華大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2015年05期

3 閆爾寶;;論作為行政訴訟法基礎(chǔ)概念的“行政行為”[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報;2015年02期

4 林翰;;也談“責(zé)令限期拆除”的法律屬性——與《淺析“責(zé)令限期拆除”的法律屬性》作者商榷[J];中國土地;2013年03期

5 楊海坤;蔡翔;;行政行為概念的考證分析和重新建構(gòu)[J];山東大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

6 官強;;淺析“責(zé)令限期拆除”的法律屬性[J];中國土地;2012年10期

7 胡建淼;胡曉軍;;行政責(zé)令行為法律規(guī)范分析及立法規(guī)范[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);2013年01期

8 李孝猛;責(zé)令改正的法律屬性及其適用[J];法學(xué);2005年02期

9 韓小平,姚愛國;責(zé)令限期拆除:行政處罰,抑或行政強制措施——對《城市市容和環(huán)境衛(wèi)生管理條例》第37條的再思考[J];上海城市管理職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2004年01期

10 周杰;;關(guān)于“責(zé)令改正”的法律思考[J];中國衛(wèi)生法制;1999年06期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前3條

1 孔祥帥;;責(zé)令停產(chǎn)停業(yè)與責(zé)令停業(yè)整頓之辨析[N];東方煙草報;2016年

2 姜青芳;;對“責(zé)令停止違法行為”的探討[N];中國海洋報;2013年

3 許阿良 ;唐振宇;;淺析責(zé)令停產(chǎn)停業(yè)整頓的適用[N];中國醫(yī)藥報;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 周娟;“責(zé)令”性環(huán)境行政行為研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

2 王軼;論行政責(zé)令行為[D];華東政法大學(xué);2014年

3 張愛萍;論行政命令[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

4 成龍;論責(zé)令改正的性質(zhì)及其法律控制[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號：1608888