本文選題：專家輔助人　切入點(diǎn)：管理制度　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：2012年修改的《刑事訴訟法》創(chuàng)設(shè)了一些新的制度,其中《刑事訴訟法》第一百九十二條:“公訴人、當(dāng)事人和辯護(hù)人、訴訟代理人可以申請(qǐng)法庭通知有專門知識(shí)的人出庭,就鑒定人作出的鑒定意見(jiàn)提出意見(jiàn)�！币�(guī)定了專家輔助人制度。2013年1月1日正式實(shí)施的我國(guó)《民事訴訟法》第七十九條:“當(dāng)事人可以申請(qǐng)人民法院通知有專門知識(shí)的人出庭,就鑒定人作出的鑒定意見(jiàn)或者專業(yè)問(wèn)題提出意見(jiàn)。”在民事訴訟領(lǐng)域也確立了這一制度。在此之前,2001年《最高人民法院關(guān)于行政訴訟證據(jù)若干問(wèn)題的規(guī)定》第四十八條:“對(duì)被訴具體行政行為涉及的專門性問(wèn)題,當(dāng)事人可以向法庭申請(qǐng)由專業(yè)人員出庭進(jìn)行說(shuō)明,法庭也可以通知專業(yè)人員出庭說(shuō)明�！痹谛姓V訟程序中確立了專家輔助人制度。自此三大訴訟法保持了一致,標(biāo)志著這一制度在我國(guó)的全面確立。這些規(guī)定是立法上對(duì)理論界在專家輔助人制度方面長(zhǎng)期研究探索的正面回應(yīng),為我國(guó)司法制度的一大進(jìn)步。但是不得不承認(rèn),新《刑事訴訟法》、新《民事訴訟法》實(shí)施以來(lái)實(shí)踐中專家輔助人的適用率偏低。為了不讓專家輔助人制度流于形式,充分發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的作用,對(duì)專家輔助人的探索依舊任重而道遠(yuǎn)。因此,本選題的目的就是以專家輔助人為研究對(duì)象,從專家輔助人的管理為切入點(diǎn),詳細(xì)分析描述專家輔助人管理的必要性、管理的客體、主體、具體制度等,以期能對(duì)此制度提供一些有益建議。本論文主要分為四部分:第一章,專家輔助人管理必要性分析。這一部分分四節(jié),四節(jié)分別從專家輔助人的角色定位、功能、行業(yè)屬性以及我國(guó)專家輔助人實(shí)踐情況等方面對(duì)專家輔助人管理的必要性進(jìn)行分析,最終得出專家輔助人需要管理的結(jié)論。第二章,專家輔助人主體資格。這一部分分兩節(jié),兩節(jié)分別介紹國(guó)外專家輔助人及類似制度中的專家資格及我國(guó)專家輔助人制度有關(guān)專家主體資格的問(wèn)題,分析當(dāng)前中國(guó)專家輔助人主體資格方面存在的問(wèn)題及相應(yīng)的對(duì)策。其中第二節(jié)從我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中專家輔助人主體問(wèn)題出發(fā),結(jié)合我國(guó)司法鑒定實(shí)踐,建議將我國(guó)專家輔助人進(jìn)行分類,并相應(yīng)的在主體資格方面制定不同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。第三章,專家輔助人管理模式。這一章分四節(jié),先分別介紹三種管理模式:法律管理主導(dǎo)型、行政管理主導(dǎo)型、行業(yè)管理主導(dǎo)型。然后分析三種管理模式的利弊,最終選擇適合的管理模式。第四章,專家輔助人管理制度的具體設(shè)想。這一部分承接第三章,共分為四節(jié),四節(jié)分別從法律管理、行政管理、審判管理、行業(yè)管理四方面提出對(duì)專家輔助人管理的具體設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law, which was amended in 2012, created a number of new systems, in which article 192th of the Code of Criminal procedure states: "Public prosecutors, parties and defenders, and ad litem agents may apply to the court to notify persons with expertise to appear in court." The article 79th of China's Civil procedure Law, which was formally implemented in January 1st 2013, states: "the parties may apply to the people's court to notify a person with expertise to appear in court," "this system has also been established in the field of civil litigation. Prior to this, the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues concerning evidence in Administrative Proceedings, 2001" (40th). Article 8: "to deal with the special problems involved in the specific administrative act of being sued," A party may apply to the court for a statement by a professional, or the court may notify a professional to appear in court... "the system of expert auxiliaries has been established in administrative proceedings... since then the three major procedural codes have been consistent," These provisions are a positive response to the long term research and exploration of the expert assistant system in the theoretical circle and a great progress in the judicial system of our country. Since the implementation of the new Code of Civil procedure, the application rate of the expert assistant is on the low side. In order not to allow the expert assistant system to become a mere formality and to give full play to its due role, Therefore, the purpose of this topic is to take the expert assistant person as the research object, from the expert assistant person management as the breakthrough point, to analyze the necessity of describing the expert assistant person management in detail. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter, the analysis of the necessity of expert assistant management. This part is divided into four sections. The four sections analyze the necessity of expert assistant person management from the following aspects: role orientation, function, industry attribute and practice of expert assistant person in our country, and finally draw the conclusion that expert assistant person needs to be managed. This part is divided into two sections, which respectively introduce the qualification of experts in foreign countries and similar systems, and the problems related to the qualification of experts in the system of expert auxiliaries in our country. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the qualification of the subject of expert assistant in China and the corresponding countermeasures. The second section starts from the problem of the subject of expert assistant in judicial practice in our country and combines the practice of judicial expertise in our country. It is suggested to classify our country's expert auxiliaries and to formulate different standards in terms of subject qualification accordingly. Chapter three, Management Model of expert Auxiliaries. This chapter is divided into four sections. First, it introduces three kinds of management modes: legal management-oriented, and so on. After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the three management modes, the author finally chooses the suitable management mode. 4th chapter, the concrete idea of the expert assistant person management system. This part carries on the third chapter, altogether divides into four sections, The four sections put forward the concrete ideas of expert assistant management from four aspects: law management, administration management, trial management and industry management.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李志恒;刑事訴訟專家輔助人制度實(shí)證研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2015年

2 柳燕;刑事專家輔助人制度實(shí)施情況研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2014年

3 高燕;論我國(guó)民事訴訟之專家證人制度[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1568867