本文選題：水庫移民　切入點：后期扶持　出處：《西安理工大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：開展大中型水庫移民后期扶持政策實施監(jiān)測評估是全面了解和掌握大中型水庫移民后期扶持政策實施情況的重要手段,對監(jiān)測各縣(市)完善后期扶持工作、恢復(fù)水庫移民生產(chǎn)生活具有極大的促進作用。目前,監(jiān)測評估工作在全國范圍內(nèi)已經(jīng)取得了一定成效,但指標體系全面性、評估方法科學(xué)性方面依然存在一些不足。如何探索出科學(xué)合理的評估指標體系和方法,使監(jiān)測評估工作科學(xué)化、規(guī)范化,真正為水庫移民后期扶持工作提供理論與實踐支持具有重要的意義和價值。本文通過梳理國內(nèi)外政策實施評估理論和移民后期扶持經(jīng)驗,在查閱相關(guān)文獻資料和實地調(diào)研的基礎(chǔ)上,分析總結(jié)了我國監(jiān)測評估工作的特點和流程。在闡述相關(guān)現(xiàn)狀及問題后,建立了大中型水庫移民后期扶持政策實施評估指標體系,并構(gòu)建層次熵權(quán)集對綜合評估模型,選取陜西省5個縣進行實證分析,依據(jù)評估結(jié)果進行對比研究,挖掘其差異性原因。本文主要研究成果包括以下內(nèi)容:(1)在分析大中型水庫移民后期扶持政策實施監(jiān)測評估現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上指出所存在問題。本文從后期扶持政策相關(guān)概念、實施內(nèi)容等方面出發(fā),在總結(jié)后期扶持政策實施評估內(nèi)容與方法的基礎(chǔ)上,從指標體系與評估方法、評估工作兩方面總結(jié)出目前監(jiān)測評估工作存在的問題有:①指標體系過于復(fù)雜,且定性指標偏多:②指標體系未配套詳細評價標準,操作不方便;③評估方法主觀性較強,降低了可靠性:④評估成果在現(xiàn)實中利用率低。(2)建立了大中型水庫移民后期扶持政策實施評估指標體系及模型。首先通過對我國監(jiān)測評估工作現(xiàn)狀和問題的分析,根據(jù)指標建立原則,從資金使用與管理情況、項目規(guī)劃與實施情況、后期扶持政策實施保障、后期扶持政策實施效果4方面建立評估指標體系,并為各個指標制定詳細的評估標準:其次采用層次分析法和熵權(quán)法計算指標權(quán)重;最后運用集對分析法確定評估等級。(3)實證分析論證大中型水庫移民后期持政策實施評估指標體系與模型可行性和可靠性。將研究建立的后期扶持政策實施評估指標體系運用到陜西省5個典型縣中,得到評估結(jié)果:PC縣聯(lián)系數(shù)為0.96,評估結(jié)果為優(yōu):BS縣聯(lián)系數(shù)為0.55,評估結(jié)果為良;CH縣聯(lián)系數(shù)為0.08,評估結(jié)果為中:Y縣聯(lián)系數(shù)為0.58,評估結(jié)果為良;SQ縣聯(lián)系數(shù)為0.36,評估結(jié)果為良,與實際情況相吻合。同時根據(jù)估結(jié)果與5個典型縣實際情況,從管理機構(gòu)及制度影響、規(guī)劃項目影響、資金使用效益影響、移民自身素質(zhì)影響4個方面深層次分析評估結(jié)果差異性原因。通過理論分析與實例應(yīng)用的總結(jié),與原有指標體系和評估方法相比,本文構(gòu)建的評估指標體系和評估模型優(yōu)勢明顯,對后續(xù)監(jiān)測評估工作有較強的指導(dǎo)意義。
[Abstract]:It is an important means to comprehensively understand and master the implementation of the support policy of the large and medium-sized reservoirs in the later stage of resettlement, to improve the later support work in the monitoring counties (cities), and to carry out the monitoring and evaluation of the later support policies for the large and medium-sized reservoirs. The restoration of reservoir resettlement production and life has greatly promoted. At present, the monitoring and evaluation work has achieved some results throughout the country, but the indicator system is comprehensive. There are still some shortcomings in the scientific evaluation methods. How to explore a scientific and reasonable evaluation index system and methods to make the monitoring and evaluation work scientific and standardized, It is of great significance and value to provide theoretical and practical support for the later stage of reservoir resettlement. On the basis of consulting relevant literature and field investigation, this paper analyzes and summarizes the characteristics and process of monitoring and evaluation work in China. After expounding the current situation and problems, the evaluation index system of supporting policy in the later period of resettlement of large and medium-sized reservoirs is established. And build the hierarchical entropy weight set comprehensive evaluation model, select five counties in Shaanxi Province for empirical analysis, according to the evaluation results of comparative study, The main research results of this paper are as follows: 1) pointing out the existing problems on the basis of analyzing the current situation of monitoring and evaluating the implementation of the supporting policies in the later stage of resettlement in large and medium-sized reservoirs. On the basis of summing up the evaluation contents and methods of the implementation of the support policy in the later stage, from the index system and the evaluation method, It is concluded from two aspects of the evaluation work that the problems existing in the current monitoring and evaluation work are that the index system of 1 / 1 is too complex, that the qualitative index system is too many and that there is no matching detailed evaluation standard for the qualitative index system, and that the evaluation method is not easy to operate and the evaluation method is more subjective. In this paper, the reliability of the evaluation results is reduced and the utilization ratio is low in reality. (2) the evaluation index system and the model for the implementation of the support policy in the later stage of the resettlement of large and medium-sized reservoirs are established. Firstly, through the analysis of the present situation and problems of the monitoring and evaluation work in China, According to the principle of index establishment, the evaluation index system is established from the aspects of fund use and management, project planning and implementation, support policy implementation guarantee in later period, and the effect of late support policy implementation. And make detailed evaluation criteria for each index: secondly, use AHP and entropy weight method to calculate index weight; Finally, the author uses set pair analysis method to determine the evaluation level. 3) empirical analysis proves the feasibility and reliability of the evaluation index system and model of policy implementation in the later stage of resettlement of large and medium-sized reservoirs. The standard system is applied to five typical counties in Shaanxi Province, The results of the evaluation are as follows: the number of connections in the 10% PC county is 0.96, the number of connections in you: BS county is 0.55, the number of connections in Liangyunch county is 0.08, the number of connections in the middle of the county is 0.58, the number of connections in the county is 0.36, and the evaluation result is good. In accordance with the actual situation. At the same time, according to the evaluation results and the actual situation of five typical counties, from the management organization and system impact, planning project impact, the impact of the use of funds, Through theoretical analysis and practical application, compared with the original index system and the evaluation method, the reasons of the difference of the evaluation results in four aspects of the immigrants' own quality are analyzed. The evaluation index system and evaluation model constructed in this paper have obvious advantages and have strong guiding significance for the follow-up monitoring and evaluation work.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西安理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D632.4

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 張春艷;李苓;;大中型水庫移民后扶政策實施現(xiàn)狀及完善建議[J];人民長江;2016年15期

2 金麗彬;;大中型水庫移民后期的扶持和監(jiān)測評估[J];中華建設(shè);2016年01期

3 張志明;杜軍;薛曉燕;史靜;;水庫移民經(jīng)濟可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究——以水庫移民后期扶持監(jiān)測評估為例[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2015年33期

4 蘭榮蓉;曹艷輝;李彥強;高璐;;非自愿移民政策與我國水庫移民政策之比較分析[J];人民長江;2015年21期

5 湯榕;鄒玉忠;許靜怡;張閩劍;羅橋;;生態(tài)移民遷徙前后生活狀況比較和對策研究[J];世界最新醫(yī)學(xué)信息文摘;2015年46期

6 方正;陳娟娟;謝濤;萬欣;;基于聚類分析和AHP的商場類建筑火災(zāi)風(fēng)險評估[J];東北大學(xué)學(xué)報(自然科學(xué)版);2015年03期

7 黃健;黃莉;施國慶;;基于BP神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的中國水庫移民可持續(xù)發(fā)展評價[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2014年13期

8 周志華;劉紅艷;李彥濤;;天津市大中型水庫移民后期扶持實施效果評估[J];海河水利;2014年01期

9 張春美;王麗君;高騰;董玉蘭;黃洪坤;;江西省水庫移民后期扶持路徑及其效果分析[J];人民長江;2014年03期

10 楊濤;左萍;;移民后期扶持政策實施配套制度框架研究[J];老區(qū)建設(shè);2013年10期

中國碩士學(xué)位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前6條

1 張濤;基于集對分析的不確定多屬性決策算法研究[D];重慶大學(xué);2014年

2 王潔瓊;水庫移民后期扶持效果綜合評價研究[D];華北水利水電大學(xué);2014年

3 牟立;水庫移民后期扶持效果評價[D];清華大學(xué);2014年

4 杜瑞芳;基于BP人工神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型的后期扶持移民風(fēng)險評價研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2014年

5 桂冬梅;基于熵權(quán)集對分析的水庫移民后期扶持政策實施效果評價研究[D];華北電力大學(xué);2013年

6 田俊;三峽庫區(qū)移民后期扶持政策執(zhí)行的研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1562244