本文關(guān)鍵詞：論不真正連帶債務(wù)之制度構(gòu)建　出處：《煙臺大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 不真正連帶債務(wù) 法律價值 制度構(gòu)建

【摘要】：不真正連帶債務(wù)概念自出現(xiàn)以來就備受爭議,其學(xué)說歷經(jīng)百年基本形成了以“原因同一說”“目的共同說”和“同一層次說”為代表或者兼采幾種學(xué)說的觀點,我國學(xué)術(shù)界基本繼承了德國理論界的觀點,具有代表性的對不真正連帶債務(wù)所作定義的是孔祥俊教授。不真正連帶債務(wù)的構(gòu)成要件有四:一是債務(wù)獨立性要件;二是數(shù)個債務(wù)偶然結(jié)合;三是給付標的同一;四是存在終局責(zé)任人。不真正連帶債務(wù)的外部效力表現(xiàn)為債權(quán)人對于債務(wù)人之一或者全體可以同時或先后為全部或一部之請求;內(nèi)部效力表現(xiàn)為已為清償?shù)膫鶆?wù)人得向終局責(zé)任人追償。不真正連帶債務(wù)具有區(qū)別于連帶債務(wù)等相鄰法律制度的獨立性特征,并被世界各國和不同地區(qū)的司法實踐所肯定,我國《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》的相關(guān)條文也體現(xiàn)了不真正連帶責(zé)任的適用規(guī)則。正因不真正連帶債務(wù)具有獨立的法律價值,鑒于我國目前相關(guān)立法的缺失,導(dǎo)致司法適用產(chǎn)生混亂,所以將不真正連帶債務(wù)制度上升到立法層面,構(gòu)建一套完整的多數(shù)人債務(wù)體系,對我國未來民法典的回填工程實有裨益,筆者基于此作相應(yīng)立法思考。
[Abstract]:The concept of unreal joint and several debts has been controversial since its emergence, and its theory has basically formed the viewpoint of "the same reason and the same reason" and "the common purpose" and "the same level" as the representative or the adoption of several theories after a hundred years. The representative definition of unreal joint and several debts is Professor Kong Xiangjun. There are four constitutive elements of untrue joint and several debts: one is the independence of debt; Second, several debts are accidentally combined; Third, the same object is given; Fourth, there is the final responsible person. The external effect of the non-real joint and several debts is that the creditor may request one or all of the debtors at the same time or successively for the whole or one part; The internal effect is that the debtor who has been paid off has to recover from the final responsible person. The non-real joint and several debt has the independence characteristic which is different from the adjacent legal system such as joint and several debt. And confirmed by the judicial practice of countries and different regions of the world, the relevant provisions of our country's Tort liability Law also reflect the applicable rules of non-genuine joint and several liability. It is precisely because the non-genuine joint and several debts have independent legal value. In view of the lack of relevant legislation in our country, resulting in confusion in the judicial application, the system of unreal joint and several debts is raised to the level of legislation, and a complete majority debt system is constructed. It is beneficial to the backfill project of our country's future civil code, based on which the author makes corresponding legislative thinking.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 稅兵;;不真正連帶之債的實定法塑造[J];清華法學(xué);2015年05期

2 楊立新;;論不真正連帶責(zé)任類型體系及規(guī)則[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2012年03期

3 張韜;;論不真正連帶債務(wù)制度的法律價值及我國的現(xiàn)實需要[J];貴州民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

4 李中原;;不真正連帶債務(wù)理論的反思與更新[J];法學(xué)研究;2011年05期

5 張定軍;;論不真正連帶債務(wù)[J];中外法學(xué);2010年04期

6 張新寶;;我國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法中的補充責(zé)任[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年06期

7 楊立新;;中國侵權(quán)責(zé)任法應(yīng)當(dāng)如何規(guī)定侵權(quán)責(zé)任形態(tài)[J];法律適用;2008年08期

8 焦富民;第三人侵害債權(quán)責(zé)任制度的比較研究[J];學(xué)海;2004年06期

9 陳建云,陸代剛;由案例研究不真正連帶債務(wù)的確認與承擔(dān)[J];濟南大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年03期

10 孔祥俊;論不真正連帶債務(wù)[J];中外法學(xué);1994年03期

，

本文編號：1432878