本文關(guān)鍵詞：預(yù)重整制度研究　出處：《鄭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 破產(chǎn)重整 法庭外重組 預(yù)重整 立法構(gòu)想

【摘要】：在現(xiàn)代自由市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的大環(huán)境中,企業(yè)的優(yōu)勝略汰是自然現(xiàn)象。為了使困境企業(yè)起死回生,實(shí)現(xiàn)利益最大化,免于企業(yè)破產(chǎn),建立了以債務(wù)人繼續(xù)存續(xù)為目標(biāo)的法律機(jī)制,即以傳統(tǒng)重整制度和法庭外債務(wù)重組制度為代表的二元拯救機(jī)制,但是這些機(jī)制也存在一定的局限性,阻礙了具有復(fù)雜多樣性的困境企業(yè)的客觀需求。而預(yù)重整制度的出現(xiàn),為困境企業(yè)提供了替代選擇方式,成為了一種新型的拯救機(jī)制,滿足了現(xiàn)在建立多元化拯救企業(yè)的客觀需求。預(yù)重整制度不僅結(jié)合傳統(tǒng)重整制度和法庭外債務(wù)重組制度的優(yōu)勢(shì),又避免了兩種制度的弊端,逐步成為拯救困境企業(yè)的新型方式,也越來(lái)越受到各國(guó)法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)和司法實(shí)務(wù)界的關(guān)注和研究。對(duì)比我國(guó)企業(yè)在破產(chǎn)重整過(guò)程中所面臨的困難,有必要引進(jìn)預(yù)重整制度,建立我國(guó)破產(chǎn)重整新制度,以解決我國(guó)困境企業(yè)的自救難題。圍繞這個(gè)選題,該文的正文部分?jǐn)M從以下四個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述:第一章,*ST賢成重整案件引發(fā)的對(duì)預(yù)重整法律制度的思考。首先介紹*ST賢成案件的案情,分析其陷入困境的原因。其次,由*ST賢成案件分析,歸納總結(jié)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行重整法律制度的現(xiàn)狀及局限性。最后,通過(guò)前兩節(jié)的分析,引入預(yù)重整制度,并對(duì)該制度在我國(guó)的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行闡述,分析該制度在我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題,為后文展開(kāi)對(duì)預(yù)重整制度的研究提供必要的實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)。第二章,預(yù)重整制度的基礎(chǔ)理論。首先,通過(guò)分析預(yù)重整制度所具有的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)、法社會(huì)學(xué)和法契約論三大理論基礎(chǔ),說(shuō)明預(yù)重整制度的建立有一定的理論基礎(chǔ)。其次,通過(guò)與破產(chǎn)和解制度、傳統(tǒng)重整制度、法庭外重組制度三者的比較分析,說(shuō)明預(yù)重整制度所具有的獨(dú)特優(yōu)勢(shì),突出預(yù)重整作為新型拯救困境企業(yè)的機(jī)制有其必要性。最后,透過(guò)客觀分析預(yù)重整制度的局限性,為構(gòu)建適合我國(guó)的預(yù)重整制度提供參考。第三章,預(yù)重整制度的比較分析。首先,通過(guò)對(duì)英美法系國(guó)家的預(yù)重整制度進(jìn)行比較,特別是美國(guó)作為預(yù)重整制度最早的發(fā)源地,擁有較為完善的制度架構(gòu),具體分析美國(guó)模式下的預(yù)重整制度的基本結(jié)構(gòu)和程序,為我國(guó)構(gòu)建預(yù)重整制度的具體規(guī)則提供借鑒。然后,通過(guò)對(duì)大陸法系國(guó)家的預(yù)重整制度進(jìn)行比較分析,例如日本再生法、泰國(guó)的“曼谷模式”等相關(guān)制度規(guī)定,都為我國(guó)預(yù)重整制度的程序設(shè)計(jì)提供參考。第四章,我國(guó)預(yù)重整制度的構(gòu)想。第一,從立法角度出發(fā),對(duì)我國(guó)預(yù)重整制度的構(gòu)建進(jìn)行了概括設(shè)計(jì),提出了作者自己的觀點(diǎn)。第二,從程序設(shè)計(jì)角度出發(fā),對(duì)預(yù)重整制度在適用中進(jìn)行了構(gòu)想,提出了作者的想法。第三,針對(duì)制度中的特殊問(wèn)題,提出了作者的建議。
[Abstract]:In the environment of modern free market economy, the survival of enterprises is a natural phenomenon. In order to bring the troubled enterprises back to life, to maximize the benefits and avoid the bankruptcy of enterprises. A legal mechanism aiming at the continued existence of the debtor is established, that is, the dual rescue mechanism represented by the traditional reorganization system and the extra-court debt restructuring system, but these mechanisms also have some limitations. It hinders the objective demand of the difficult enterprises with complex diversity, and the emergence of the pre-reorganization system provides alternative options for the troubled enterprises and becomes a new type of rescue mechanism. The pre-reorganization system not only combines the advantages of the traditional restructuring system and the out-of-court debt restructuring system, but also avoids the drawbacks of the two systems. Gradually become a new way to rescue troubled enterprises, but also more and more attracted the attention and research of the legal academic and judicial practice of various countries. Compared with the difficulties faced by Chinese enterprises in the process of bankruptcy reorganization. It is necessary to introduce the pre-reorganization system and establish a new bankruptcy reorganization system in order to solve the difficult problem of self-rescue of the troubled enterprises in China. Around this topic, the text of this paper will be discussed from the following four aspects: chapter one. First of all, introduce the case of St Xiancheng case, analyze the reasons for its predicament. Secondly, from the St Xian Cheng case analysis. Finally, through the analysis of the first two sections, the introduction of the pre-reorganization system, and the current situation of the system in China is expounded. This paper analyzes the problems of the system in the judicial practice of our country, and provides the necessary practical basis for the later research on the pre-reorganization system. Chapter two, the basic theory of the pre-reorganization system. By analyzing the legal economics, sociology of law and the theory of contract of law, it is shown that the establishment of pre-reorganization system has certain theoretical basis. Secondly, through the settlement system of bankruptcy. The comparative analysis of the traditional reorganization system and the out-of-court reorganization system shows the unique advantages of the pre-reorganization system, and highlights the necessity of pre-reorganization as a new mechanism to rescue the troubled enterprises. Through the objective analysis of the limitations of the pre-reorganization system, for the construction of the pre-reorganization system suitable for China to provide a reference. Chapter three, the comparative analysis of the pre-reorganization system. First. Through the comparison of the pre-reorganization system in Anglo-American law system countries, especially the United States as the earliest birthplace of the pre-reorganization system, it has a relatively perfect institutional framework. This paper analyzes the basic structure and procedure of the pre-reorganization system under the American model, and provides a reference for the construction of the specific rules of the pre-reorganization system in China. Then, through the comparative analysis of the pre-reorganization system in the countries of civil law system. For example, the Japanese rebirth law, Thailand's "Bangkok Model" and other relevant institutional provisions, all provide reference for the program design of China's pre-reorganization system. 4th chapter, the concept of China's pre-reorganization system. First, from the legislative point of view. This paper gives a general design of the construction of pre-reforming system in China, and puts forward the author's own viewpoint. Secondly, from the point of view of program design, the author conceives the application of pre-reforming system. The author puts forward the author's ideas. Thirdly, the author's suggestions are put forward in the light of the special problems in the system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D922.291.92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 魏艷紅;;龐德的法社會(huì)學(xué)理論[J];法制博覽;2016年11期

2 林燕;;困境企業(yè)拯救的預(yù)重整機(jī)制初探[J];法制與社會(huì);2016年06期

3 張海征;金曉文;;淺析英國(guó)破產(chǎn)法上的預(yù)重整制度[J];全國(guó)商情(理論研究);2012年07期

4 董惠江;;我國(guó)企業(yè)重整制度的改良與預(yù)先包裹式重整[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2009年05期

5 胡利玲;;論困境企業(yè)拯救的預(yù)先重整機(jī)制[J];科技與法律;2009年03期

6 楊柳;;法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)及法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的思維方式研究[J];大陸橋視野;2009年05期

7 王佐發(fā);;預(yù)重整制度的法律經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];政法論壇;2009年02期

8 楊柳;;從“浙江海納”看我國(guó)的破產(chǎn)重整制度[J];企業(yè)活力;2008年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 安海濤;;廈門(mén) “預(yù)重整”拯救瀕危企業(yè)[N];人民法院報(bào);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1411474