本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)人格權(quán)立法模式的選擇　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 人格 人格權(quán) 立法模式 人格權(quán)獨(dú)立成編

【摘要】：人格權(quán)是當(dāng)代民法極為重要的組成部分。民法是一部權(quán)利法,在所有的民事權(quán)利中,最為重要的就是以人格利益為客體的人格權(quán)。隨著一體化進(jìn)程的加快,經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、科技進(jìn)一步的發(fā)展,人格利益的內(nèi)容、形式日益增多,也更趨向復(fù)雜化。日前,《中華人民共和國(guó)民法總則(草案)(三次審議稿)》已在中國(guó)人大網(wǎng)上公布,面向社會(huì)征集修訂意見(jiàn)。其中,有關(guān)人格權(quán)法的制定將關(guān)系到《民法總則》的編排順序,關(guān)系到人格權(quán)法在民法典中的體例安排,關(guān)系到國(guó)家法律對(duì)人格權(quán)的保護(hù)程度,更關(guān)系到人們的切身利益。本文第一章為我國(guó)人格權(quán)立法的考察,本章共分為兩節(jié)。第一節(jié)對(duì)人格、人格權(quán)的基本理論進(jìn)行研究,考察人格的內(nèi)涵從羅馬法到近代民法再到現(xiàn)代民法的發(fā)展歷程以及人格權(quán)的概念和特征。第二節(jié)對(duì)人格權(quán)立法在中國(guó)的發(fā)展歷程進(jìn)行研究,主要介紹1911年編纂完成的《大清民律草案》、1930年公布的《中華民國(guó)民法典》、1986年制定的《民法通則》、2002年頒布的《中華人民共和國(guó)民法(草案)》,由梁慧星教授、王利明教授、徐國(guó)棟教授三位學(xué)者主持編寫的《中國(guó)民法典草案學(xué)者建議稿》和2016年12月新公布的《中華人民共和國(guó)民法典·民法總則(草案)(三次審議稿)》�？v覽人格權(quán)立法體例在我國(guó)的發(fā)展,人格權(quán)逐漸獲得重視,并很可能作為未來(lái)民法典中重要的一部分進(jìn)行較為全面、系統(tǒng)的立法。第二章為域外人格權(quán)立法體例考察,本章共分為三節(jié)。第一節(jié)為大陸法系人格權(quán)立法例,對(duì)法國(guó)、德國(guó)、瑞士、烏克蘭、中國(guó)臺(tái)灣地區(qū)民法典中有關(guān)人格權(quán)的立法體例進(jìn)行研究。第二節(jié)為英美法系人格權(quán)立法例,對(duì)英國(guó)、美國(guó)法律以及判例中有代表性的人格權(quán)進(jìn)行研究。第三節(jié)為本章小結(jié),世界各國(guó)（地區(qū)）關(guān)于人格權(quán)的立法對(duì)我國(guó)人格權(quán)立法具有重要的借鑒意義,我國(guó)應(yīng)制定符合中國(guó)國(guó)情的人格權(quán)法。第三章為我國(guó)民法典中人格權(quán)法立法模式論爭(zhēng),本章共分為三節(jié)。第一節(jié)針對(duì)以梁慧星、尹田教授為代表的學(xué)者關(guān)于人格權(quán)法獨(dú)立成編這一理論持否定觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行介紹。第二節(jié)針對(duì)以王利明教授、楊立新教授為代表的學(xué)者關(guān)于人格權(quán)法獨(dú)立成編這一理論持肯定觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行研究,同時(shí)簡(jiǎn)單介紹部分學(xué)者對(duì)人格權(quán)在民法典中的制度安排所持的不同見(jiàn)解。第三節(jié)為我國(guó)民法典中人格權(quán)立法模式的確立,筆者對(duì)人格權(quán)法獨(dú)立成編持贊同觀點(diǎn),并對(duì)楊立新教授編寫的《人格權(quán)法》(第四版)進(jìn)行評(píng)析,闡述自己的觀點(diǎn)及理由。
[Abstract]:Personality right is an extremely important part of contemporary civil law. Civil law is a law of rights, in all civil rights, the most important thing is the personality right with personality interests as the object. With the acceleration of the process of integration. The further development of economy, culture, science and technology, the content of personality interests, the form of increasing, but also more complex. The General principles of the Civil Law of the people's Republic of China (draft) (third draft for deliberation) have been published on the website of the Chinese people's Congress to solicit amendments to the public. The formulation of the personality right law will relate to the arrangement order of the General principles of Civil Law, the style arrangement of the personality right law in the civil code, and the degree of protection of the personality right in the national law. The first chapter is the investigation of personality right legislation in our country, this chapter is divided into two sections. The first section studies the basic theory of personality and personality right. The connotation of personality from Roman law to modern civil law to modern civil law to the development of modern civil law, as well as the concept and characteristics of personality rights. It mainly introduces the draft of the people's Law of the Qing Dynasty which was compiled in 1911, the Civil Code of the Republic of China published in 1930, and the General principles of Civil Law made on 1986. In 2002, the Civil Law of the people's Republic of China (draft) was promulgated by Professor Liang Huixing and Professor Wang Liming. The proposed draft Chinese Civil Code prepared by Professor Xu Guodong and the newly published draft Civil Code of the people's Republic of China 路General principles of Civil Law in December 2016. Review the development of personality right legislation in China. Personality rights have gradually been attached importance to, and probably as an important part of the future civil code to carry out a more comprehensive, systematic legislation. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section is the civil law system of personal rights legislation, France, Germany, Switzerland, Ukraine. In the civil code of Taiwan area of China, the legislative style of personality right is studied. The second section is the legislation of personality right in Anglo-American law system. The third section is the summary of this chapter. The legislation of personality rights in various countries (regions) in the world has important reference significance to the legislation of personality right in our country. The third chapter is the debate on the legislative model of personality right law in the Civil Code of our country. This chapter is divided into three sections. The first section is aimed at Liang Huixing. Professor Yin Tian as the representative of the scholars on the personality rights of the independent compilation of the theory of a negative point of view. The second section is directed to Professor Wang Liming. The scholars represented by Professor Yang Lixin hold a positive view on the theory of the independence of personality right law. At the same time a brief introduction of some scholars in the civil code of personality rights in the institutional arrangements held by different views. Section three is the establishment of the legal model of personality rights in the Civil Code, the author of the personality rights law independent editing views. The author comments on the personal right Law (4th edition) written by Professor Yang Lixin, and expounds his own views and reasons.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張平華;民法中的四種行為范疇關(guān)系探析——以侵權(quán)行為法在民法典中獨(dú)立成編為中心[J];長(zhǎng)江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 王利明;;再論人格權(quán)的獨(dú)立成編[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2012年07期

3 王利明;論侵權(quán)行為法的獨(dú)立成編[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年04期

4 王利明;;再論人格權(quán)的獨(dú)立成編[J];法商研究;2012年01期

5 修真;;論人格權(quán)能獨(dú)立成編的理由[J];法制與社會(huì);2012年10期

6 肖新喜;裴金盛;;我國(guó)人格權(quán)法編撰體例理論之科學(xué)評(píng)析[J];新疆社會(huì)科學(xué);2013年05期

7 鐘瑞棟;;人格權(quán)法不能獨(dú)立成編的五點(diǎn)理由[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2008年02期

8 陳慧楓;徐玲玲;;試論人格權(quán)的獨(dú)立成編[J];湖北第二師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年05期

9 王喜軍,姬翠梅;論人格權(quán)法獨(dú)立成編[J];大同醫(yī)學(xué)�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2004年04期

10 李麗慧;淺議人格權(quán)在民法典中能否獨(dú)立成編[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前5條

1 □中國(guó)政法大學(xué)教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 米 健 □沈建峰;對(duì)人格權(quán)獨(dú)立成編理由的三個(gè)追問(wèn)[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

2 ■全國(guó)人大常委會(huì)法工委民法室主任　王勝明　□本報(bào)記者　洪文軍;民法典編纂六大熱點(diǎn)[N];解放軍報(bào);2003年

3 本報(bào)記者 吳曉鋒 本報(bào)通訊員 徐文;人格權(quán)法應(yīng)在民法中獨(dú)立成編[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

4 中國(guó)人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院博士研究生 袁雪石;人格權(quán)不宜獨(dú)立成編?[N];人民法院報(bào);2004年

5 本報(bào)記者陳麗平;人格權(quán)法獨(dú)立成編 保障人權(quán)原則凸顯[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2003年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 禹旭輝;論人格權(quán)的概念及在民法中的地位[D];華中科技大學(xué);2015年

2 王美;我國(guó)人格權(quán)立法模式的選擇[D];山東大學(xué);2017年

3 孫易洪;民法典中人格權(quán)法獨(dú)立成編問(wèn)題研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1411139