本文關(guān)鍵詞：美國介入中國海洋領(lǐng)土爭端研究　出處：《吉林大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 釣魚島爭端 南海爭端 美國介入 中國崛起 美國霸權(quán)

【摘要】：近期,中國與周邊有關(guān)國家的海洋領(lǐng)土爭端呈現(xiàn)激化態(tài)勢。在東海,中日圍繞釣魚島的主權(quán)歸屬展開了爭鋒;在南海,中越和中菲島嶼紛爭不斷。美國奧巴馬政府實(shí)施“亞太再平衡戰(zhàn)略”以來,積極地介入這些爭端。一方面,美國承若美日安保條約適用于釣魚島;另一方面,她還從多個(gè)層次介入南海爭端。面對美國介入中國海洋領(lǐng)土爭端,不由產(chǎn)生以下困惑:首先,美國介入爭端的方式是什么?其次,美國為什么要介入這些問題,它與“亞太再平衡戰(zhàn)略”有什么關(guān)系?再次,美國的介入會產(chǎn)生哪些影響?最后,它的介入前景怎樣,中國應(yīng)該怎樣應(yīng)對?結(jié)合學(xué)界已有研究,本文將試著解析以上問題。除緒論和結(jié)論外,正文分為四部分:第一部分,中國海洋領(lǐng)土爭端與美國的介入。2010年以來,源于國力的相對衰落、國內(nèi)問題重重,日本打破中日在釣魚島擱置爭議的共識,重啟釣魚島之爭。同樣,由于擔(dān)憂中國的迅速崛起,以及借助美國“重返東南亞”戰(zhàn)略,東南亞有關(guān)國家也開始挑戰(zhàn)中國南海有關(guān)島嶼的主權(quán)。美國積極地介入這些爭端,不但應(yīng)用同盟條約協(xié)防釣魚島,介入釣魚島之爭;還從單邊、雙邊和多邊層次介入南海爭端。由于同盟性質(zhì)、爭端性質(zhì)以及時(shí)間進(jìn)程等原因,美國介入兩處爭端的方式存在不同。第二部分,美國介入中國海洋領(lǐng)土爭端的動機(jī)。冷戰(zhàn)后,美國的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)是維護(hù)美國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位,為此她緊盯任何潛在競爭者的出現(xiàn)、占據(jù)良好的地緣位置以及保持強(qiáng)大同盟關(guān)系。中國的快速崛起和最近的海洋領(lǐng)土爭端,作為自變量和干擾變量,給美國的目標(biāo)維護(hù)帶來困難。因此,美國介入爭端,塑造中國崛起過程,維護(hù)自身在亞太的地緣優(yōu)勢和同盟體系,以保持自身的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)地位。第三部分,美國介入中國海洋領(lǐng)土爭端的影響。首先,美國介入爭端會影響中國維護(hù)領(lǐng)土完整的努力,分散中國建設(shè)“海洋強(qiáng)國”和“21世紀(jì)海上絲綢之路”的精力。其次,美國介入中國海洋領(lǐng)土爭端會加重彼此猜忌,影響“中美新型大國關(guān)系”的構(gòu)建。亞太是全世界最有活力、也是充滿挑戰(zhàn)的地區(qū),美國介入爭端會造成局勢不穩(wěn)影響亞太的和平與發(fā)展。第四部分,美國的介入前景與中國的應(yīng)對。雖然,特朗普上臺后不時(shí)指責(zé)中國,但美國不會改變塑造中國崛起的戰(zhàn)略。如果爭端繼續(xù)存在,美國為了自身在亞太的戰(zhàn)略目標(biāo)還會介入爭端,但介入的方式和時(shí)間由形勢決定。對此,中國可以把“穩(wěn)定爭端”與“和平共處”作為近期處理爭端以及對美介入的目標(biāo)。對此,中國可以通過靈活應(yīng)用“一報(bào)還一報(bào)”策略,加強(qiáng)非傳統(tǒng)安全領(lǐng)域合作以及探討中美“大交易”的可能性,來應(yīng)對爭端和美國的介入。
[Abstract]:Recently, the maritime territorial dispute between China and the surrounding countries has been intensified. In the East China Sea, China and Japan have launched a dispute over the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands. In the South China Sea, disputes between China and Vietnam and between China and the Philippines continue. The Obama administration has been actively involved in these disputes since the implementation of the "Asia-Pacific rebalancing Strategy." on the one hand, the United States has agreed that the US-Japan security treaty is applicable to the Diaoyu Islands; On the other hand, she also involved in disputes in the South China Sea from many levels. In the face of the United States' involvement in China's maritime territorial disputes, the following puzzles arise: first, what is the way for the United States to intervene in disputes? Second, why should the United States intervene in these issues? what does it have to do with the Asia-Pacific rebalancing Strategy? Third, what will be the impact of American intervention? Finally, what is the prospect of its intervention, and how should China respond? In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the text is divided into four parts: the first part, China's maritime territorial dispute and the intervention of the United States. Since 2010. Japan has broken the consensus between China and Japan to shelve the dispute over the Diaoyu Islands because of the relative decline of national power and domestic problems. Similarly, it is worried about the rapid rise of China. With the help of the United States' strategy of "returning to Southeast Asia", the countries concerned in Southeast Asia have also begun to challenge the sovereignty of the islands in the South China Sea. The United States has actively intervened in these disputes, not only by using the alliance treaty to assist in the defense of the Diaoyu Islands. Get involved in the Diaoyu Islands; Also from unilateral, bilateral and multilateral levels to intervene in the South China Sea dispute. Because of the nature of the alliance, the nature of the dispute and the time process and other reasons, the United States involved in the two disputes in different ways. Part two. The motive for the United States to intervene in China's maritime territorial dispute. After the Cold War, the strategic goal of the United States was to maintain its leadership position, and for that reason it focused on the emergence of any potential competitors. China's rapid rise and recent maritime territorial disputes, as independent and disruptive variables, make it difficult for the United States to maintain its objectives. The United States intervened in the dispute, molded the process of China's rise, and maintained its geographical superiority and alliance system in the Asia-Pacific region in order to maintain its leading position. The third part, the influence of the United States' intervention in China's maritime territorial dispute. The United States' involvement in the dispute will affect China's efforts to safeguard its territorial integrity and distract China's efforts to build a "maritime power" and a "maritime Silk Road" in 21th century. Us involvement in China's maritime territorial disputes will exacerbate mutual suspicion and affect the construction of a "new type of great power relationship between China and the United States." Asia-Pacific is the most dynamic and challenging region in the world. U.S. involvement in the dispute could cause instability to affect peace and development in the Asia-Pacific region. Part 4th, the prospect of U.S. involvement and China's response, though Trump has criticized China from time to time since taking office. But the United States will not change its strategy to shape China's rise. If the dispute persists, the United States will intervene in the dispute for its own strategic objectives in the Asia-Pacific region, but the manner and timing of intervention will be determined by the situation. China can make "stable disputes" and "peaceful coexistence" the goals of dealing with disputes and intervening in the United States in the near future. In this regard, China can flexibly apply the strategy of "one return for one return." Strengthen cooperation in non-traditional security and explore the possibility of a "big deal" between China and the United States to deal with disputes and U.S. involvement.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D871.2;D823

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬德義;淺議俄聯(lián)邦內(nèi)若干民族間的領(lǐng)土爭端[J];西伯利亞研究;2004年02期

2 金愛明;當(dāng)今國際領(lǐng)土爭端的焦點(diǎn)──島嶼[J];中學(xué)地理教學(xué)參考;1996年11期

3 劉清才,孔慶茵;亞太地區(qū)領(lǐng)土爭端的成因及其解決方法[J];東北亞論壇;2003年02期

4 ;日韓領(lǐng)土爭端[J];地圖;2005年03期

5 陳勝武;;國家戰(zhàn)略偏好對領(lǐng)土爭端解決意愿的影響[J];國際論壇;2007年04期

6 聶宏毅;;國際法在解決領(lǐng)土爭端中的作用及困境評析[J];黑龍江史志;2009年02期

7 邵建平;;柬泰柏威夏寺及其附近領(lǐng)土爭端透析[J];學(xué)術(shù)探索;2009年04期

8 李開盛;;領(lǐng)土爭端要善于打“組合牌”[J];學(xué)習(xí)月刊;2010年25期

9 張昊;李帆;;日俄領(lǐng)土爭端:國際國內(nèi)的雙重博弈[J];改革與開放;2011年08期

10 邵建平;;緬甸和泰國領(lǐng)土爭端的由來及解決前景[J];東南亞南亞研究;2011年04期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 李玉玲;趙菊芬;;國際法下釣魚島主權(quán)爭端的評估[A];《中國海洋法學(xué)評論》2013年卷第2期[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 潘曉英;領(lǐng)土爭端懸而未決 日俄和約締結(jié)無盟[N];檢察日報(bào);2000年

2 日本國立新o_大學(xué)副教授 張?jiān)?解決東亞領(lǐng)土爭端需有大智慧[N];人民日報(bào)海外版;2013年

3 張志鵬;新教宗或可在調(diào)停英阿領(lǐng)土爭端上發(fā)揮獨(dú)特作用[N];中國民族報(bào);2013年

4 孫西輝 編譯;《外交學(xué)人》:日俄解決領(lǐng)土爭端存在有利條件[N];社會科學(xué)報(bào);2013年

5 邢立騰;領(lǐng)土爭端：日俄表現(xiàn)“兩重天”[N];人民日報(bào)海外版;2011年

6 王凱;俄日領(lǐng)土爭端出現(xiàn)轉(zhuǎn)機(jī)？[N];人民日報(bào)海外版;2012年

7 駐京記者 王少U，

本文編號：1375329