美國利率政策對中國經(jīng)濟的外溢效應研究
本文關(guān)鍵詞:美國利率政策對中國經(jīng)濟的外溢效應研究 出處:《華東師范大學》2017年博士論文 論文類型:學位論文
更多相關(guān)文章: 美國利率政策 外溢效應 動態(tài)隨機一般均衡模型 貨幣政策規(guī)則
【摘要】:近年來,隨著全球經(jīng)濟一體化進程的不斷深化,國際經(jīng)濟與金融形成一個相互聯(lián)系的有機整體。商品與資本的跨境流通加速,使各國貨幣政策相互影響,溢出效應明顯。美國作為世界第一大經(jīng)濟體,在全球經(jīng)濟中居主導地位,其貨幣政策變化除影響本國經(jīng)濟運行外,還會對世界上其他國家的經(jīng)濟產(chǎn)生重要影響。同時,在當前的世界經(jīng)濟格局與全球貨幣體系中,美元無疑是大多數(shù)國家最主要的儲備貨幣,因此美國貨幣政策沖擊會對全球其他經(jīng)濟體產(chǎn)生更為顯著的影響。2015年12月16日,美國聯(lián)邦儲備局宣布上調(diào)聯(lián)邦基金利率25個基點,目標利率將維持在0.25%至0.50%之間,其貨幣政策由寬松轉(zhuǎn)向緊縮。時隔一年,在北京時間2016年12月15日,美聯(lián)儲又宣布加息25個基點,將聯(lián)邦基金目標利率上調(diào)至0.5%-0.75%之間,這是繼美國實行零利率政策以來的第二次加息。在全球經(jīng)濟與金融一體化的大背景下,美聯(lián)儲貨幣政策調(diào)整勢必對世界經(jīng)濟產(chǎn)生深遠影響,對各國央行貨幣政策制定提出挑戰(zhàn)。本文采取實證分析與理論分析相統(tǒng)一的研究框架,來探究美國利率政策調(diào)整對中國經(jīng)濟的外溢效應。通過歷史經(jīng)驗分析與VAR模型的實證分析,得到美國利率政策沖擊之下中國經(jīng)濟的經(jīng)驗特征。然后,根據(jù)實證分析所得特征事實,結(jié)合中國經(jīng)濟和貨幣政策實踐的特點,構(gòu)建了一個新開放經(jīng)濟動態(tài)隨機一般均衡(NOE-DSGE)模型,來研究美聯(lián)儲加息對中國經(jīng)濟的影響及其傳導機制。從1990年1月至2008年12月,美國大致經(jīng)歷了3輪完整的利率周期,分別為:1994年1月至1998年11月利率周期、1999年7月-2003年6月利率周期、2004年4月-2008年11月利率周期。從20世紀90年代至今,美聯(lián)儲經(jīng)歷了4次加息進程。美聯(lián)儲加息進程一般始于經(jīng)濟企穩(wěn)復蘇,就業(yè)狀況逐漸好轉(zhuǎn),就業(yè)率表現(xiàn)良好,通貨膨脹率開始回升并超過目標通脹率(臨界點通常為2%),且伴隨著較強的趨勢性上升。當經(jīng)濟由過熱轉(zhuǎn)冷,通貨膨脹預期趨于合理,通脹率出現(xiàn)下降時,加息周期結(jié)束。隨著中國經(jīng)濟開放度的逐步提升,中美利率政策與宏觀經(jīng)濟的聯(lián)動性不斷加強,美國利率政策調(diào)整對中國經(jīng)濟的影響更趨復雜;谙蛄孔曰貧w(VAR)模型的實證分析顯示,在美國利率一個標準差大小的正向沖擊之下,聯(lián)邦基金利率不斷上升,作用效果較為顯著,持續(xù)時間較長。國內(nèi)利率隨之持續(xù)上升,但相較與聯(lián)邦基金利率,國內(nèi)利率變化幅度較小,持續(xù)時間較短。聯(lián)邦基金利率沖擊對中國產(chǎn)出在短期內(nèi)產(chǎn)生了較強的正向溢出效應,在中期則產(chǎn)生了一定負向溢出效應,而在長期則影響式微。美聯(lián)儲加息將使得中國在短期內(nèi)出現(xiàn)較嚴重的通脹效應,人民幣名義匯率在短期出現(xiàn)大幅貶值趨勢,中后期則出現(xiàn)小幅升值趨勢。官方外匯儲備出現(xiàn)暫時下降趨勢,表明貨幣當局的匯率政策為"逆風而行"的干預政策。國內(nèi)貨幣供應量在短期出現(xiàn)小幅下降,之后開始回升到正向水平,表明央行匯率干預政策為"非沖銷"式,匯率的干預使得外匯占款同時發(fā)生變化。國際石油價格在短期大幅上升,之后逐漸回落;表明美聯(lián)儲加息后,供給成本增加,國內(nèi)通脹壓力加大。基于上述特征事實,結(jié)合中國經(jīng)濟和貨幣政策實踐的特點,本文構(gòu)建了一個新開放經(jīng)濟動態(tài)隨機一般均衡(NOE-DSGE)模型,來研究美聯(lián)儲加息對中國經(jīng)濟的影響及其傳導機制。本文的創(chuàng)新在于,在基準理論模型中包含了跨境資本流動管制,考慮了實體經(jīng)濟與金融部門中存在的金融摩擦,引入了兩類金融加速器。同時,基于央行不斷進入外匯市場對匯率變化進行直接干預,從而造成外匯占款不斷增加的現(xiàn)實,本文將貨幣當局資產(chǎn)負債表嵌入模型動態(tài)系統(tǒng),刻畫這一重要特征;另外,根據(jù)中國當前貨幣政策操作的實際情況,采用數(shù)量型貨幣政策規(guī)則,并包含了匯率目標(或匯率目標區(qū)間),貨幣當局可據(jù)此進行間接干預以保持匯率穩(wěn)定。對以上新開放經(jīng)濟動態(tài)隨機一般均衡(NOE-DSGE)模型進行求解,然后對模型參數(shù)進行校準與貝葉斯估計,最后通過數(shù)值模擬,分析了美聯(lián)儲加息對中國經(jīng)濟的影響及其傳導機制。通過將理論模型與VAR模型進行比較可知,美國利率、中國利率、國內(nèi)生產(chǎn)總值、貨幣供應量、價格水平、外匯儲備、人民幣匯率等變量基于VAR模型的實證分析所得結(jié)論與基于動態(tài)隨機一般均衡(DSGE)模型的理論分析所得結(jié)論一致,表明特征事實與理論模型具有較強的自洽性,從而實現(xiàn)了實證分析與理論分析的高度統(tǒng)一。在一個統(tǒng)一的模型框架內(nèi),綜合評估了各種貨幣政策規(guī)則及其福利績效?傮w來說,若央行實施數(shù)量型貨幣政策,McCallum規(guī)則盯住實際匯率目標最優(yōu),其次為McCallum不盯住匯率目標,而McCallum規(guī)則盯住名義匯率目標區(qū)間表現(xiàn)居末;若央行實施價格型貨幣政策,Taylor規(guī)則盯住實際匯率目標最優(yōu),其次為Taylor不盯住匯率目標,而Taylor規(guī)則盯住名義匯率目標區(qū)間表現(xiàn)居末。在現(xiàn)行意愿性結(jié)售匯制度下,若數(shù)量型貨幣政策與價格型貨幣政策所包含的目標變量相同,則數(shù)量型貨幣政策規(guī)則(McCallum規(guī)則)優(yōu)于價格型貨幣政策規(guī)則(Taylor規(guī)則)。而在"藏匯于民"制度下,若數(shù)量型貨幣政策與價格型貨幣政策所包含的目標變量相同,則價格型貨幣政策規(guī)則(Taylor規(guī)則)優(yōu)于數(shù)量型貨幣政策規(guī)則(McCallum規(guī)則)。為降低美聯(lián)儲加息對中國經(jīng)濟帶來的潛在風險,必須全面深化改革,提升中國經(jīng)濟的內(nèi)生增長動力。同時,央行應靈活運用貨幣政策與匯率政策,提升有效應對國外利率沖擊的能力。貨幣當局應提高貨幣政策決策的透明度,穩(wěn)定居民預期,疏通貨幣政策調(diào)控經(jīng)濟的渠道,理順貨幣政策的傳導機制;為避免美聯(lián)儲啟動新的加息周期后在短期出現(xiàn)較劇烈的資本外流,央行應完善對跨境資本流動的管制制度,構(gòu)筑有效的監(jiān)測指標和預警體系。當前,全球重要的經(jīng)濟體之間貨幣政策存在嚴重沖突,加之反全球化、新保護主義與孤立主義勢力在國際上抬頭,可能會給中國經(jīng)濟帶來巨大風險。中國貨幣當局應就貨幣政策選擇與美國聯(lián)邦儲備局保持溝通,提升國內(nèi)資本市場運作效率,提高金融體系的戰(zhàn)略地位,構(gòu)建高效的防火墻來防范境外金融風險,科學合理的制定金融改革的路徑與節(jié)奏。提高匯率彈性,適度擴大人民幣匯率的浮動區(qū)間,完善人民幣匯率的形成機制。中國這樣的大國,從長期戰(zhàn)略來看,自由浮動無疑是最適宜的匯率形成機制。在過度階段,較為適宜的匯率制度應該是人民幣有效匯率在一個較寬的波動區(qū)間內(nèi)浮動,這個制度能夠較好地兼顧人民幣匯率的靈活性與穩(wěn)定性。降低國際儲備規(guī)模與外匯占款數(shù)量,減少央行被動進入外匯市場進行直接干預的頻率,減輕央行資產(chǎn)負債表對其貨幣政策操作的鉗制作用。在當前,數(shù)量型貨幣政策仍有其繼續(xù)存在的理論依據(jù)與現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ);實現(xiàn)從數(shù)量型貨幣政策向價格型貨幣政策的漸進式轉(zhuǎn)型是較可取的選擇。貨幣當局可在實施數(shù)量型貨幣政策的同時,開始著手構(gòu)建價格型調(diào)控的基準利率體系,最終實現(xiàn)從數(shù)量型貨幣政策向價格型貨幣政策的漸進轉(zhuǎn)變。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the deepening of the process of global economic integration, the international economy and finance have formed an organic whole that is interconnected. The cross-border circulation of goods and capital has accelerated, which makes the monetary policy of various countries influence each other, and the spillover effect is obvious. As the world's largest economy, the United States plays a leading role in the global economy. Its monetary policy changes will not only affect its economic operation, but also have an important impact on other countries' economies in the world. At the same time, in the current world economic structure and the global monetary system, the US dollar is undoubtedly the most important reserve currency in most countries. Therefore, the impact of the US monetary policy will have a more significant impact on other economies in the world. In December 16, 2015, the Federal Reserve announced that the federal funds rate will be raised by 25 basis points, the target interest rate will remain between 0.25% and 0.50%, and its monetary policy will shift from loose to tight. A year later, in Beijing time December 15, 2016, the Fed announced another 25 basis points for raising interest rates, raising the target rate of federal funds to 0.5%-0.75%, which is the second increase in interest rate since the US implemented the zero interest rate policy. Under the background of global economic and financial integration, the monetary policy adjustment of the Federal Reserve will have a profound impact on the world economy and challenge the central bank's monetary policy making. This paper adopts a framework of empirical analysis and theoretical analysis to explore the spillover effect of American interest rate policy adjustment on China's economy. Through the analysis of historical experience and the empirical analysis of the VAR model, the empirical characteristics of the Chinese economy under the impact of American interest rate policy are obtained. Then, based on the empirical analysis and the characteristics of China's economic and monetary policy, a dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (NOE-DSGE) model of new open economy is constructed to study the impact of the Fed's interest rate on China's economy and its transmission mechanism. From January 1990 to December 2008, the United States went through 3 rounds of complete interest rate cycles: January 1994 to November 1998, interest rate cycle, July 1999 -2003 June interest rate cycle and -2008 annual interest rate cycle. Since 1990s, the Fed has experienced 4 interest rate hikes. The Fed's interest rate raising process usually starts with the stabilization and recovery of the economy, and the employment situation gradually improves. The employment rate performs well. The inflation rate starts to rise and exceed the target inflation rate (critical point is always 2%), and it is accompanied by a strong trend. When the economy is from overheating to cold, the inflation expectation tends to be reasonable and the inflation rate falls, the interest rate increase cycle ends. With the gradual improvement of China's economic openness, Sino US interest rate policy and macro-economic linkage have been strengthened. The impact of US interest rate policy adjustment on China's economy is more complex. The empirical analysis based on vector autoregression (VAR) model shows that under the impact of the US standard deviation of interest rate, the interest rate of federal funds is rising, the effect is more significant, and the duration is longer. Domestic interest rates have continued to rise, but compared with the federal funds rate, domestic interest rates have changed slightly, and the duration is shorter. The impact of the federal funds interest rate on China's output has a strong positive spillover effect in the short run, and it has a negative spillover effect in the middle period, while in the long run, it has a negative impact. The Fed's interest rate increase will lead to a more severe inflation effect in China in the short term. The nominal exchange rate of RMB will have a significant depreciation trend in the near future, and a slight appreciation trend will appear in the middle and later stage. A temporary decline in official foreign exchange reserves shows that the monetary authority's exchange rate policy is a policy of "against the wind". The domestic money supply decreased slightly in the short run, and then began to rise to a positive level, indicating that the central bank's exchange rate intervention policy is "non sterilized", and the intervention of exchange rate makes foreign exchange changes at the same time. The international oil price rose sharply in the short term, after gradually decline; the Fed interest rate hike, the supply cost increase, domestic inflation pressure. Based on the above characteristics, combined with the characteristics of China's economic and monetary policy practice, this paper constructs a new dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (NOE-DSGE) model of new open economy to study the impact of the Fed's interest rate on China's economy and its transmission mechanism. The innovation of this paper is that the cross border capital flow control is included in the benchmark theory model, considering the financial frictions existing in the real economy and the financial sector, and two financial accelerators are introduced. At the same time, the central bank continued to enter the foreign exchange market for direct intervention on the exchange rate based on the change, resulting in increased foreign exchange reality, the monetary authorities in the balance sheet dynamic system model is embedded, depict the important characteristics; in addition, according to the actual situation of the current Chinese monetary policy operation, the number of monetary policy rules, and includes the exchange rate target (or target interval), the monetary authorities will therefore perform indirect intervention to keep the exchange rate stable. The above new open economic dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (NOE-DSGE) model is solved. Then, the calibration and Bayesian estimation of the model parameters are carried out. Finally, through numerical simulation, the influence of the Fed's interest rate on China's economy and its transmission mechanism are analyzed. Through the theoretical model and the VAR model were compared, China US interest rate, interest rate, GDP, money supply, price level, foreign exchange reserves, the RMB exchange rate and other variables based on VAR analysis and the conclusion based on the dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model to analyze the conclusion, that the facts and features the theoretical model has strong self consistency, so as to realize the unification of empirical analysis and theoretical analysis. In the framework of a unified model, various monetary policy rules and their welfare performance are evaluated comprehensively. On the whole, if the central bank implements the quantitative monetary policy
【學位授予單位】:華東師范大學
【學位級別】:博士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:F827.12;F124
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蔡述理;美國利率攀高的影響及其前景[J];世界經(jīng)濟;1984年11期
2 ;東亞貨幣與日元之間的相關(guān)度減弱[J];國際市場;2005年05期
3 布拉德福德·德隆,許彬彬;美國利率之謎[J];商務周刊;2005年11期
4 耿群;美國利率走勢之謎解析[J];國際金融研究;2005年09期
5 布拉德福德·德隆;;美國利率之謎[J];招商周刊;2005年25期
6 謝芳敏;;談美國利率變動對發(fā)展中國家經(jīng)濟的影響[J];商業(yè)時代;2009年20期
7 蔡子正;王功娥;;淺議美國利率市場化及其對我國的啟示[J];商場現(xiàn)代化;2010年31期
8 程實;;他山之石:美國利率市場化[J];國際融資;2013年09期
9 劉仲直;;淺談戰(zhàn)后美國利率的變化[J];天津金融研究;1983年Z1期
10 劉仲直;李虹;;今年內(nèi)美國利率將居高難下[J];天津金融研究;1984年09期
相關(guān)會議論文 前2條
1 章嘉琳;;美國利率、經(jīng)濟走勢及對華經(jīng)貿(mào)政策[A];“美國經(jīng)濟中長期趨勢及其對中美經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系的影響”研討會論文集[C];2006年
2 劉義圣;;美國利率政策調(diào)整的國際傳導——基于亞洲國家利率的面板數(shù)據(jù)分析[A];“外國經(jīng)濟學說與當代世界經(jīng)濟”學術(shù)研討會暨中華外國經(jīng)濟學說研究會第20次學術(shù)年會論文集[C];2012年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條
1 陳思進 加拿大皇家銀行資深顧問;美國利率上揚或?qū)⒑硠尤蚪?jīng)濟發(fā)展步伐[N];中國黃金報;2013年
2 證券時報記者 李明珠;美國利率轉(zhuǎn)正; 香港或臨三重打擊[N];證券時報;2014年
3 田舍;美國利率趨升 美歐股市走軟[N];國際商報;2004年
4 記者 高改芳;香港利率將跟隨美國利率上升[N];中國證券報;2005年
5 記者 唐勇;美國利率創(chuàng)5年來最高點[N];人民日報;2006年
6 王振華;美經(jīng)濟學家預測美國利率走勢[N];中國審計報;2002年
7 史靜媛;市場對美國利率上升預期降溫[N];經(jīng)濟參考報;2006年
8 胡芳;經(jīng)濟和通脹形勢決定未來美國利率走向[N];中國信息報;2007年
9 《中國黃金報》首席研究員 覃維桓;“股神”巴菲特說的對嗎?[N];中國黃金報;2013年
10 殷小茵;美國利率趨升 美元大幅走高[N];國際商報;2004年
相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條
1 何彥清;美國利率政策對中國經(jīng)濟的外溢效應研究[D];華東師范大學;2017年
2 施真強;戰(zhàn)后美國利率政策研究[D];武漢大學;2010年
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條
1 周雁潔;《即將到來的美國利率收緊周期—一帆風順或波瀾不斷》(節(jié)選)翻譯項目報告[D];四川外國語大學;2016年
2 馬麗娜;美國利率政策對經(jīng)濟周期波動的影響研究[D];華中科技大學;2011年
3 管昱矗;人民幣兌美元匯率與美國利率交互影響關(guān)系研究[D];西南財經(jīng)大學;2014年
4 龔富琴;美國利率政策實踐及基于宏觀視角的效應分析[D];浙江大學;2010年
,本文編號:1338427
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/jjglbs/1338427.html