本文關(guān)鍵詞：長(zhǎng)江口青草沙水庫(kù)前沿河床動(dòng)力地貌過(guò)程及庫(kù)堤安全預(yù)警分析　出處：《華東師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 河床演變 安全預(yù)警 動(dòng)力地貌過(guò)程 青草沙水庫(kù) 長(zhǎng)江口 分流口

【摘要】：河口位居陸海交匯的狹窄區(qū)域,因其擁有自然和人類(lèi)無(wú)與倫比的資源(如生物多樣性、航道)而對(duì)全球和局部區(qū)域的發(fā)展具有重要價(jià)值。高強(qiáng)度人類(lèi)活動(dòng)作用下的河口動(dòng)力地貌過(guò)程一直是當(dāng)前國(guó)際陸海相互作用計(jì)劃以及未來(lái)海岸計(jì)劃研究的重點(diǎn)內(nèi)容。然而,隨著近年來(lái)水利工程建設(shè)的開(kāi)展,上游來(lái)水來(lái)沙條件發(fā)生改變,進(jìn)入下游河道的能量分配和泥沙輸移量隨之轉(zhuǎn)移,河口區(qū)的地貌自然格局已有較大變化,這已成為科學(xué)和社會(huì)不同層面面臨的共同挑戰(zhàn)。青草沙水庫(kù)作為長(zhǎng)江河口區(qū)近年來(lái)最大的水利工程之一,不僅是上海市最大的城市供水水源地,也是國(guó)內(nèi)迄今為止規(guī)模最大的避咸蓄淡型河口江心水庫(kù)。水庫(kù)位于上接南支河道,下控南北港河勢(shì)的南北港分流口附近,周?chē)瞪沉_列,變動(dòng)頻繁,河勢(shì)復(fù)雜多變,演變趨勢(shì)不明朗,這將影響青草沙水庫(kù)前沿岸堤的穩(wěn)定與上海市飲用水的供給安全。因此開(kāi)展庫(kù)區(qū)前沿河床動(dòng)力地貌過(guò)程對(duì)青草沙水庫(kù)工程響應(yīng)的研究,具有重要的理論和應(yīng)用價(jià)值。本文基于2006-2015年長(zhǎng)江口北港實(shí)測(cè)水文泥沙資料(主要包括流速、流向、含沙量、懸沙底沙級(jí)配等數(shù)據(jù))分析青草沙水庫(kù)前沿河段水動(dòng)力和懸沙分布等特征。利用長(zhǎng)江口南北港分流口區(qū)域采集的2000、2002、2004、2007以及2009-2013等多年實(shí)測(cè)水深資料,診斷青草沙水庫(kù)前沿灘槽形態(tài)的變化和穩(wěn)定性特征,進(jìn)而探討水庫(kù)前沿的河床沖淤變化過(guò)程。主要結(jié)論包括:從水流特性來(lái)看,北港分流口水流運(yùn)動(dòng)形式主要為往復(fù)流,以落潮流占優(yōu)勢(shì)。其中落潮歷時(shí)大于漲潮歷時(shí),落潮流速大于漲潮流速�？菁緷q潮動(dòng)力強(qiáng)于洪季,落潮動(dòng)力弱于洪季。研究區(qū)域水體含沙量分布表現(xiàn)為落潮大于漲潮,枯季全潮含沙量大于洪季。其中水體的含沙量沿垂線(xiàn)分布是由底部向表層遞減;在憩流時(shí)段附近,垂線(xiàn)流速紊亂、含沙量沿垂線(xiàn)分布展現(xiàn)無(wú)明顯變化的分布特征。同時(shí),漲、落急時(shí)段內(nèi)流速大、水流動(dòng)力和挾沙能力強(qiáng)、含沙量大;憩流時(shí)段內(nèi)水流速度小、含沙量相對(duì)較小。新橋通道附近含沙量低于青草沙水庫(kù)尾閭所在位置。從懸沙粒徑沿程分布來(lái)看,北港分流口河段表現(xiàn)為:新橋通道附近顆粒較粗,青草沙水庫(kù)尾閭所處位置顆粒較細(xì)。表層沉積物顆粒組成表現(xiàn)為南北港分流口河段河床表層沉積物較粗,主要有細(xì)砂和砂兩種主要類(lèi)型,分選性較好;北港青草水庫(kù)前沿主槽河段河床表層沉積物顆粒組成較細(xì)、分布有細(xì)砂和粉砂質(zhì)砂兩種類(lèi)型、分選性相對(duì)較好,這在一定程度反映了北港主槽水動(dòng)力略弱于南北港分流口。研究區(qū)河床沖淤表現(xiàn)為:庫(kù)堤前沿河床出現(xiàn)上部先沖再淤,中下部由強(qiáng)到弱的淤積過(guò)程。水庫(kù)庫(kù)堤前沿邊灘以及堡鎮(zhèn)沙尾部位是重點(diǎn)淤積區(qū)域,北港主槽淤積不明顯。青草沙水庫(kù)前沿河床沖淤變化在水庫(kù)建設(shè)前后有明顯差異:建庫(kù)前總體表現(xiàn)為河槽沖刷、沙洲淤積,呈現(xiàn)準(zhǔn)沖-淤振蕩性質(zhì);建庫(kù)后表現(xiàn)為持續(xù)沖刷。水庫(kù)庫(kù)堤前沿河床也由之前的周期性沖-淤變化轉(zhuǎn)為幅度逐漸減弱的持續(xù)沖刷。同時(shí),水庫(kù)前沿河床的沙體沿落潮主流方向移動(dòng),成形沙體先增長(zhǎng)、再減少,最后趨于平衡,隱形沙體主要分布在南北港分流口以及水庫(kù)庫(kù)堤前沿,堡鎮(zhèn)沙附近有少量分布。此外,青草沙水庫(kù)前沿河床河槽形態(tài)由U型向U型和V型河槽疊加的復(fù)式河槽轉(zhuǎn)變。其中上部河床邊灘刷深、中部河床l栍倨膠�、咸斂�?jiǎn)巡U型槽上疊加V型復(fù)式河槽。青草沙水庫(kù)庫(kù)堤前沿不到600 m位置是河床失穩(wěn)的重點(diǎn)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)區(qū)域,尤其是水庫(kù)庫(kù)堤中上部河床處于不穩(wěn)定狀態(tài),如前沿邊坡所在河槽進(jìn)一步逼近水庫(kù)前沿,則河床面臨進(jìn)一步?jīng)_刷的可能。
[Abstract]:The estuary is located in the narrow area where land and sea converge. Because it has natural and human resources, such as biodiversity and waterway, it is of great value to the development of global and local regions. The dynamic geomorphologic process of estuaries under the action of high intensity human activities has been the focus of current international land sea interaction plan and future coastal planning research. However, with the development of water conservancy construction in recent years, the upstream runoff and sediment conditions change, energy distribution and sediment transport into the downstream channel shifted, natural geomorphic patterns have great changes in the estuary, which has become the common challenges facing different levels of science and society. The grass sand reservoir in the Yangtze River Estuary as one of the largest water conservancy project in recent years, not only is the largest city of Shanghai water supply, is by far the country's largest freshwater storage to avoid salty type River Estuary reservoir. The reservoir is located in the South Branch of the river on the ground, under the control of the north and south south and North River distributary shoal near the mouth, around the list changes frequently, terrain complex, the evolution trend of uncertainty, which will affect the stability of drinking water in Shanghai coastal levee Qingcaosha Reservoir before the supply of security. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical value to carry out the research on the response of the river bed dynamic geomorphology to the engineering response of the green grass and sand reservoir. In this paper, 2006-2015 north channel of Changjiang Estuary hydrology based on sediment data (including velocity and sediment concentration, suspended sediment gradation data such as Sha DI) of Qingcaosha Reservoir before the water along the river hydrodynamic and sediment distribution characteristics. The port in the South and North diversion regional collection of 2000, 2002, 2004, 2007 and 2009-2013 years of measured bathymetric data, diagnosis of Qingcaosha Reservoir variation before the groove shape and stability characteristics of Yantan reservoir, and then discusses the frontier of riverbed erosion process. The main conclusions are as follows: from the flow characteristics, North diversion flow slobber is mainly in the form of reciprocating flow, with the ebb dominant. The ebb duration is longer than that of the flood and ebb tide flow rate is greater than. The dry season power Yuhong season, tide power weak Yu season. Study on regional water sediment concentration distribution is greater than the ebb tide, the dry season Quanchao sediment concentration is greater than the flood season. The sediment water distribution along the vertical direction is decreasing from the bottom to the surface; in the slack period near the vertical velocity, sediment concentration distribution along the disorder showed no significant changes in the vertical distribution. At the same time, the rise and fall of acute period of high velocity, hydrodynamic and sediment carrying capacity, large sediment; slack period flow velocity and sediment concentration relatively small. Xinqiao channel near the sediment below the grass sand reservoir at the location. The grain size distribution, the North River diversion performance: the bridge channel near the coarse particles, Qingcaosha Reservoir located in fine particle at. The surface sediment particle composition showed the north port diversion of river bed surface sediment is thick, there are two types of fine sand and sand, good sorting; North grass reservoir riverbed sediments front main component is small, the distribution of fine sand and silty sand, two types of sorting is relatively good, this to a certain extent reflects the main channel of the north channel hydrodynamic slightly weaker than the South and North diversion. The scouring and silting of riverbed in the study area shows that the upper part of the riverbed is first washed and re silted in the upper part of the bank, and the middle and lower part of the river bed is from strong to weak. The reservoir dike beach front and tail parts is the focus of Bao Zhen Sha siltation area, sediment deposition is not obvious. Qingcaosha Reservoir frontier of riverbed erosion have obvious differences in the reservoir before and after the construction: before the construction of the overall performance of channel erosion and sand deposition, a quasi - and impulse oscillation properties; after the reservoir showed continued erosion. The river bed in front of the reservoir bank also changed from the previous periodic flushing and silting to the gradual weakening of the scour. At the same time, the mobile sand reservoir before the river bed along the mainstream direction, forming the first sand body growth, then decreases, finally tends to balance the distribution of sand body in the South and north main contact and reservoir diversion dike frontier, a small amount of the distribution of sand near the town. In addition, the grass sand reservoir before stacking along the bed channel morphology from U type to U type and V type channel double channel transformation. The upper river beach, Central River l deep brush glue, Lu Kang Suan from Xuan yo groove superimposed on the V type compound channel. Qingcaosha Reservoir dike frontier less than 600 m position is the focus of risk loss of riverbed area stability, especially the reservoir in the upper river embankment is in an unstable state, such as the slope where the channel further approaching the reservoir frontier, is facing further erosion of riverbed may.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TV143;TV698

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 本刊編輯部;;上海570多萬(wàn)市民率先喝上來(lái)自青草沙水庫(kù)優(yōu)質(zhì)長(zhǎng)江水[J];水資源保護(hù);2011年01期

2 王銘瑋;張宏偉;王曉鵬;樂(lè)勤;盧士強(qiáng);;青草沙水域水質(zhì)變化特征及對(duì)上海供水安全的影響[J];中國(guó)給水排水;2011年13期

3 俞清;;《青草沙水庫(kù)水域水環(huán)境研究》通過(guò)評(píng)審[J];上海水利;2000年02期

4 ;青草沙水庫(kù)設(shè)計(jì)上創(chuàng)新[J];凈水技術(shù);2006年04期

5 劉坤;;運(yùn)用世行業(yè)務(wù)政策對(duì)青草沙水源地供水安全的評(píng)估[J];給水排水;2010年06期

6 蔣增輝;;青草沙水庫(kù)浮游藻類(lèi)的調(diào)查及控制[J];凈水技術(shù);2012年05期

7 ;青草沙水庫(kù)及取輸水泵閘工程簡(jiǎn)介[J];上海水務(wù);2007年S1期

8 王傳江;;青草沙水庫(kù)及取水泵閘工程砂源選擇及開(kāi)采設(shè)計(jì)[J];城市道橋與防洪;2010年06期

9 ;上海長(zhǎng)江口青草沙水源地項(xiàng)目建設(shè)正式啟動(dòng)[J];城市道橋與防洪;2007年06期

10 李穎;;青草沙工程嚴(yán)橋支線(xiàn)輸水鋼管的化學(xué)檢驗(yàn)技術(shù)[J];科技創(chuàng)新導(dǎo)報(bào);2010年16期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 李杰;袁建忠;;青草沙水庫(kù)流場(chǎng)和水質(zhì)點(diǎn)數(shù)學(xué)模型計(jì)算分析[A];中國(guó)水利學(xué)會(huì)2007學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)人類(lèi)活動(dòng)與河口分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2007年

2 莫敖全;陳海英;;青草沙水源地開(kāi)發(fā)和發(fā)展趨勢(shì)研究[A];上海市飲用水水源地戰(zhàn)略研討會(huì)論文集[C];2004年

3 李嘉海;王紹祥;朱宜平;顧靜;;2012年青草沙水庫(kù)下游閘口內(nèi)浮游藻類(lèi)群落變化的調(diào)查[A];飲用水安全控制技術(shù)會(huì)議暨中國(guó)土木工程學(xué)會(huì)水工業(yè)分會(huì)給水委員會(huì)第13屆年會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

4 吳衛(wèi);林順才;劉樺;;青草沙水源地庫(kù)址方案數(shù)值比選[A];自然、工業(yè)與流動(dòng)——第六屆全國(guó)流體力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2001年

5 都國(guó)梅;袁建忠;李杰;;青草沙水庫(kù)龍口設(shè)置與進(jìn)占水力特性探討之一[A];中國(guó)水利學(xué)會(huì)2007學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)人類(lèi)活動(dòng)與河口分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2007年

6 吳彩娥;袁建忠;;青草沙水庫(kù)保灘丁壩設(shè)計(jì)關(guān)鍵要素分析研究[A];中國(guó)水利學(xué)會(huì)2013學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集——S5河口治理與保護(hù)[C];2013年

7 韓玉芳;錢(qián)明霞;王學(xué)蘭;于守兵;;青草沙水庫(kù)龍口保護(hù)期局部沖刷試驗(yàn)研究[A];第十四屆中國(guó)海洋（岸）工程學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2009年

8 陸忠民;吳彩娥;;青草沙水庫(kù)堤壩工程設(shè)計(jì)關(guān)鍵技術(shù)研究與實(shí)踐[A];中國(guó)水利學(xué)會(huì)2013學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集——S5河口治理與保護(hù)[C];2013年

9 劉漢中;;潮汐河口青草沙水庫(kù)保灘護(hù)底工程設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)踐[A];中國(guó)水利學(xué)會(huì)2013學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集——S5河口治理與保護(hù)[C];2013年

10 談祥;謝東;謝慧嬌;;青草沙水庫(kù)下游水閘加大排水能力工程措施研究和理論分析[A];中國(guó)水利學(xué)會(huì)2013學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集——S5河口治理與保護(hù)[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 記者 趙維光;青草沙水庫(kù)明年三月全線(xiàn)合龍[N];文匯報(bào);2008年

2 記者顧定海;青草沙工程更要具有抗風(fēng)險(xiǎn)能力[N];聯(lián)合時(shí)報(bào);2011年

3 趙維光;青草沙將成上海主導(dǎo)水源地[N];文匯報(bào);2008年

4 趙維光;引青草沙凈水過(guò)江供市民[N];文匯報(bào);2008年

5 記者 宋鵬霞;避咸蓄淡：青草沙能持續(xù)供水[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

6 記者 趙維光;青草沙水源地年內(nèi)開(kāi)始供水[N];文匯報(bào);2010年

7 通訊員 田軍　記者 康曉芳;浦東四鎮(zhèn)居民首批飲用青草沙水源[N];東方城鄉(xiāng)報(bào);2010年

8 早報(bào)記者 李繼成;青草沙開(kāi)始送水 明年6月一半市民喝上最清上海水[N];東方早報(bào);2010年

9 早報(bào)記者 李繼成;滬最優(yōu)水體青草沙水庫(kù)建成[N];東方早報(bào);2010年

10 本報(bào)記者 張奕　梁建剛 黃勇娣;青草沙水,那些你我最關(guān)心的事[N];解放日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 盛皓;長(zhǎng)江口青草沙水庫(kù)前沿河床動(dòng)力地貌過(guò)程及庫(kù)堤安全預(yù)警分析[D];華東師范大學(xué);2017年

2 陳青毅;青草沙水庫(kù)庫(kù)內(nèi)流動(dòng)特征[D];上海交通大學(xué);2009年

3 陳涇;青草沙水庫(kù)流場(chǎng)、滯留時(shí)間及鹽水入侵來(lái)源[D];華東師范大學(xué);2014年

4 宋少紅;長(zhǎng)江口青草沙水源地原水工程可行性研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2008年

5 何易;青草沙水庫(kù)藻類(lèi)及其毒素污染狀況和微囊藻提取物的遺傳毒性試驗(yàn)[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2013年

6 張紅梅;青草沙水庫(kù)藻類(lèi)增殖及其毒素形成研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1344001