陜西秦嶺地區(qū)生態(tài)安全測度研究
[Abstract]:The Qinling Mountains is a conceptual dividing line between north and south of China. It has a variety of biological resources and abundant water resources. It is an important ecological functional area in Shaanxi and even the whole country. However, in recent years, with the rapid development of society and economy in Qinling, Shaanxi, the demand for natural resources is increasing, and the ecological environment of Qinling has been seriously damaged by, haze, debris flow. Environmental problems such as soil erosion are also a serious threat to people's health and development. Therefore, it is very important to improve the ecological security of Qinling region. Under the condition of research background and significance, this paper combs the relevant theories of ecological security research and literature review at home and abroad, and analyzes the general situation, ecological status and ecological security status of Qinling region of Shaanxi Province. Secondly, the common ecological security measurement methods are analyzed and compared, and the ecological L-V symbiotic model is established and constructed by using the theory of symbiosis, and the index system of ecological security is improved and tested by cluster analysis and variation coefficient method. The index weight is determined by the method of AHP and entropy weight combining qualitative and quantitative analysis. Thirdly, the stable equilibrium point of ecological L-V symbiotic model is solved, and the stability of the model is analyzed dynamically, and the criterion of ecological security is obtained. Based on the above model, the ecological status of 38 districts and counties in Qinling region of Shaanxi Province was measured, and the results of ecological security measurement were obtained. Finally, the paper analyzes the causes of the unfavorable ecological security in the districts and counties, and puts forward some suggestions for improving the characteristics of the Qinling region of Shaanxi Province. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) combining L-V model, analytic hierarchy process, entropy weight method, cluster analysis method and coefficient of variation method, the whole measurement process mentioned above is quantified and subjective randomness is reduced to the maximum extent. The results obtained are more scientific and reasonable. (2) at present, the ecological security situation in Qinling area of Shaanxi Province is the worst in Hanzhong City, followed by Shangluo City, Baoji City and Weinan City. From the longitudinal analysis, we can see that the ecological security situation of 9 districts and counties such as Baqiao District has been improved correspondingly, while the ecological security situation of 10 districts and counties such as Hanyin County is in a downward trend, especially Xunyang County, which has the biggest decline. Improvement measures should be taken as soon as possible. (3) the rapid growth of population, poor development of secondary industry, tourism, forest and pharmaceutical industry and illegal mining of minerals are the main reasons for the deterioration of ecological security in Qinling region of Shaanxi Province. In view of this, this paper puts forward some suggestions on controlling the population quantity and improving the population quality, optimizing the industrial structure and improving the production efficiency, strengthening the supervision and management of the exploitation of mineral resources, utilizing and accelerating the construction of Qinling Park.
【學位授予單位】:西安理工大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:X826
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 王磊;郭燦;李慧明;;基于PSR-TOPSIS模型的寧夏回族自治區(qū)土地生態(tài)安全評價[J];水土保持研究;2016年06期
2 邵佳;冷志明;;武陵山片區(qū)區(qū)域生態(tài)安全測度與評價[J];經(jīng)濟地理;2016年10期
3 馮彥;祝凌云;鄭潔;辛姝玉;張大紅;;基于PSR模型和GIS的吉林省縣域森林生態(tài)安全評價及時空分布[J];農(nóng)林經(jīng)濟管理學報;2016年05期
4 邊得會;曹勇宏;何春光;高昆;;生態(tài)健康、生態(tài)風險、生態(tài)安全概念辨析[J];環(huán)境保護科學;2016年05期
5 張鳳太;蘇維詞;;基于均方差-TOPSIS模型的貴州水生態(tài)安全評價研究[J];灌溉排水學報;2016年09期
6 湯鵬;王浩;;基于“P-S-R”模型的紫金山國家森林公園生態(tài)安全評價[J];江蘇農(nóng)業(yè)科學;2016年08期
7 肖成明;王真;郭懷成;;蒙特卡洛模擬在湖泊生態(tài)安全評價指標權重確定中的應用[J];安全與環(huán)境工程;2016年04期
8 吳柏海;余琦殷;林浩然;;生態(tài)安全的基本概念和理論體系[J];林業(yè)經(jīng)濟;2016年07期
9 高鳳杰;侯大偉;馬泉來;黃善林;孫華;;退耕還林背景下寒地山區(qū)土地生態(tài)安全演變研究[J];干旱區(qū)地理;2016年04期
10 陳勇;洪強;劉艷中;曾向陽;甘勇;;地下鐵礦山土地生態(tài)安全評價——理論方法與實證檢驗[J];安全與環(huán)境學報;2016年03期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 馬明德;寧夏東部風沙區(qū)生態(tài)安全評價研究[D];寧夏大學;2014年
相關碩士學位論文 前3條
1 朱震;甘肅省生態(tài)安全影響因素貢獻度的實證分析[D];蘭州大學;2016年
2 王琪;美麗中國建設中的生態(tài)安全問題研究[D];遼寧工業(yè)大學;2016年
3 郎珍軍;貴陽市巖溶山區(qū)生態(tài)安全評價研究[D];貴州師范大學;2009年
,本文編號:2190761
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shengtaihuanjingbaohulunwen/2190761.html