本文選題：有機紫外線吸收劑 + 珠江水系��； 參考：《中國科學院大學(中國科學院廣州地球化學研究所)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：紫外線過濾劑(UVFs)被廣泛添加到個人護膚品中以保護人類皮膚頭發(fā)遭受紫外線傷害,紫外線穩(wěn)定劑(UVSs)的則被添加到各種工業(yè)產品中以延緩產品老化。經過使用后的紫外線吸收劑(UVAs)通過淋洗、揮發(fā)等多種方式進入環(huán)境中。目前,有機紫外線吸收劑已經在大氣、水體、沉積物、生物等多種環(huán)境中檢出。然而,UVAs在生物組織中的分布以及影響UVAs在生物中富集的因素尚有待進一步揭示,以便全面客觀地評估UVAs環(huán)境污染對生物和生態(tài)的危害。珠江流域日照時間長,紫外線輻射強,人口密集,經濟和工業(yè)發(fā)達,是研究有機紫外線吸收劑在生物體內富集規(guī)律的理想區(qū)域。本研究以7類13種常見的有機紫外線吸收劑為目標化合物包括:3-(4-甲基芐烯)-樟腦(4-MBC)、對二甲氨基苯甲酸異辛酯(ODPABA)、2-羥基-4-甲氧基二苯甲酮(BP-3)、2-羥基-4-正辛氧基二苯甲酮(UV-531)、阿伏苯宗(AVO);對甲氧基肉桂酸辛酯(EHMC)、奧克立林(OCR)、2-(2-羥基-5-苯甲基)苯并三唑(UVP)、2-(2H-苯并三唑-2-基)-4,6-二(1-甲基-1-苯基乙基)苯酚(UV-234)、2-(5-氯-2H-苯并三唑-2-基)-6-叔丁基-4-甲基苯酚(UV-326)、2,4-二-叔丁基-6-(5-氯-2H-苯并三唑-2-基)苯酚(UV-327)、2-(2H-苯并三唑-2-基)-4,6-二叔戊基苯酚(UV-328)、2-(2H-苯并三唑-2-基)-4-(1,1,3,3-四甲基丁基)苯酚(UV-329),研究這些UVAs在珠江水系典型水生生物的分布,探討其在水生生物體內的富集及放大以及影響因素。主要結果有:(1)13種UVAs在生物背肉中總濃度范圍為141.31-1650.79ng/g脂重(lw),主要為BP-3、UV-531、UV-P和UV-234,其中UV-531濃度最高,均值濃度達401.48ng/g lw。UVAs在硬骨魚綱中(305.99-793.62ng/g lw)濃度高于甲殼綱(154.81-277.35ng/g lw),在肉食性魚類中濃度(均值600.39ng/g lw)高于雜食性(均值515.06ng/g lw)、草食性(均值363.33ng/g lw)和濾食性(均值340.81ng/g lw)生物。EHMC主要存在于肉食性魚類背肉中,蝦體內富集EHMC較為明顯。旱季(10月-次年3月)生物背肉組織富集的UVAs的含量高于雨季。棲息水層并沒有對UVAs的富集產生顯著的差異性,可能跟珠江水系水深不足以使其產生顯著差異性有關。(2)UVAs在生物不同組織最多表現為肝臟腩肉背肉,可能與UVAs的親脂性有關。福壽魚背肉組織中的UVAs呈現出隨體長的增大ΣUVAs濃度先增加后減小的趨勢,雄魚和雌魚背肉組織中的ΣUVAs并沒有呈現出顯著差異性。(3)生物卵中UVAs分布廣泛,脊尾白蝦體內富集的EHMC卵中的含量明顯高于雄性肌肉和母體肌肉,表明UVAs在甲殼綱中可能有向子代轉移的趨勢。(4)UVAs的生物積累因子(BAF)的對數(LogBAF)值均大于3.3,表明UVAs具有一定的生物富集性,但是LogBAF和LogKow并沒有表現出顯著的相關性(p0.05),卻表現出一定的正相關(斜率=0.24,r=0.51)。深層水棲生物計算其生物-沉積物富集因子(BSAF)值,其范圍在0-17.9之間,UV-531的BSAF值最高且大于1,表現出相比于沉積物,其更易在生物體內富集。(5)UVAs的營養(yǎng)級放大因子(TMFs)為0.76-1.79。其中OCR、UV-531和UV-234的TMF值大于1,表示其可能隨著食物鏈的傳播發(fā)生生物放大作用。
[Abstract]:Ultraviolet filter agent (UVFs) is widely added to personal skin care products to protect human skin from UV damage. The ultraviolet stabilizer (UVSs) is added to various industrial products to delay the aging of products. After using the ultraviolet absorbent (UVAs), the UV Absorbents are washed and volatilized into the environment. Ultraviolet absorbents have been detected in a variety of environments, such as atmospheric, water, sediment, and biology. However, the distribution of UVAs in biological tissues and the factors affecting the enrichment of UVAs in organisms have yet to be further revealed in order to assess the biological and ecological hazards of UVAs environmental pollution in an all-round and objective way. The sunshine time of the Pearl River Basin is long, and the ultraviolet radiation is long. It is an ideal area for studying the enrichment of organic ultraviolet absorbents in organisms. This study uses 7 kinds of 13 kinds of common organic ultraviolet absorbents as target compounds: 3- (4- methyl benzenes) camphor (4-MBC), two methylamino benzoate (ODPABA), 2- hydroxyl -4- methoxy two benzene Ketone (BP-3), 2- hydroxy -4- n-octyl two benzophenone (UV-531), amvolene (AVO), methoxy cinnamate octyl (EHMC), Ake Lillian (OCR), 2- (2- hydroxy -5- benzomethyl) benzo three azole (UVP), 2- (tertiary butyl phenyl ethyl) phenol (UV-531), tertiary butyl benzene Phenol (UV-326), 2,4- two - tert Ding Ji -6- (5- chloride -2H- benzo and three azole -2- based) phenol (UV-327), 2- (2H- benzo three azole -2- based) -4,6- ditert phenol phenol (UV-328), investigated the distribution of the typical aquatic organisms in the Pearl River system, and explore its enrichment in aquatic organisms. The main results are as follows: (1) the total concentration range of 13 kinds of UVAs in biological back meat is 141.31-1650.79ng/g fat weight (LW), mainly BP-3, UV-531, UV-P and UV-234, and the concentration of UV-531 is the highest, and the mean concentration of 401.48ng/g lw.UVAs is higher than that of the Crustacea in the hard bone fish class (305.99-793.62ng/g LW). The concentration (mean 600.39ng/g LW) in the carnivorous fishes was higher than the omnivorous (mean 515.06ng/g LW), the herbivorous (mean 363.33ng/g LW) and filter feeding (mean 340.81ng/g LW) biological.EHMC mainly existed in the meat fish back meat, and the enrichment of EHMC was more obvious in the shrimp. The UVAs content of the biological back meat was high in the dry season (October - March). In the rainy season, the inhabiting water layer did not produce significant difference in the enrichment of UVAs, which may not be enough to make a significant difference with the water depth of the Pearl River system. (2) UVAs in the different tissues of the organism is the most manifested as the meat of the liver of the liver, which may be related to the lipophilicity of the UVAs. The UVAs in the fishes' back meat tissue presents an increasing Sigma UVA with the length of the body. The s concentration increased first and then decreased, and the sigma UVAs in the male and female dorsal meat tissues did not show significant difference. (3) the distribution of UVAs in the biological eggs was wide, and the content of the enriched EHMC eggs in the body of the tail white shrimp was obviously higher than that of the male muscles and the mother muscles. It showed that the UVAs may have the tendency to transfer to the progeny in the crustaceans. (4) the birth of UVAs. The logarithmic (LogBAF) value of the substance accumulation factor (BAF) was greater than 3.3, indicating that UVAs had a certain bioaccumulation, but LogBAF and LogKow did not show significant correlation (P0.05), but showed a certain positive correlation (slope =0.24, r=0.51). Deep aquatic organisms calculated their biological sediment enrichment factor (BSAF) value, and their range was between 0-17.9. The BSAF value of UV-531 is the highest and greater than 1, showing that it is more likely to be enriched in the organism than in the sediments. (5) the nutrient grade amplification factor (TMFs) of UVAs is 0.76-1.79. and OCR, UV-531 and UV-234 is more than 1, indicating that it may be amplified by the spread of the food chain.
【學位授予單位】：中國科學院大學(中國科學院廣州地球化學研究所)
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：X52;X171.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 丁怡;;2007年-2015年防曬類化妝品中防曬劑的使用情況變化[J];中國衛(wèi)生檢驗雜志;2016年06期

2 李立平;魏東斌李;敏肖;銘陰;俊霞;杜宇國;;有機紫外防曬劑內分泌干擾效應研究進展[J];環(huán)境化學;2012年02期

3 黃方千;李強林;楊東潔;馮西寧;鄭雄;;有機紫外線吸收劑研究進展[J];印染;2011年20期

4 蔡彩仁;;珠三角地區(qū)水環(huán)境現狀和飲用水源地保護策略[J];三峽環(huán)境與生態(tài);2011年02期

5 楊紅蓮;襲著革;閆峻;張偉;;新型污染物及其生態(tài)和環(huán)境健康效應[J];生態(tài)毒理學報;2009年01期

6 沈言潔;;光穩(wěn)定劑在彩色影像保存中的應用[J];影像技術;2008年05期

7 狄效斌;孫繼朝;荊繼紅;黃冠星;陳璽;;珠江三角洲地區(qū)水環(huán)境污染特點及其相關因素探討[J];南水北調與水利科技;2008年04期

8 寧培森;王克昌;丁著明;;二苯甲酮類紫外線吸收劑的發(fā)展趨勢[J];塑料助劑;2008年02期

9 陳有雙;;光穩(wěn)定劑的生產現狀與發(fā)展趨勢[J];化工之友;2007年15期

10 安秋鳳;王雁;路德待;黃良仙;王前進;;織物用抗紫外線整理劑的研究進展[J];化工進展;2007年06期

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 金佳濱;珠江河口海洋水生生物中有機紫外線吸收劑的富集研究[D];中國科學院研究生院(廣州地球化學研究所);2016年

2 周如江;二苯甲酮類紫外線吸收劑的合成及提純工藝的研究[D];華中科技大學;2007年

，

本文編號：2055708