本文選題：天人合一 + 生態(tài)��； 參考：《四川省社會科學(xué)院》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：對于“天人合一”是否具有生態(tài)意義,學(xué)者們始終爭論不休。一些學(xué)者以大量論據(jù)從多個(gè)角度來論證“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義,力圖將“天人合一”詮釋為人與自然的和諧共生�？闪硪恍⿲W(xué)者認(rèn)為“天人合一”的重點(diǎn)不在人與自然的關(guān)系,而在人倫禮教,目的是借“天”的威嚴(yán)構(gòu)建道德體系并維護(hù)封建帝王統(tǒng)治。故此,這些學(xué)者主張對“天人合一”所謂的生態(tài)意義持謹(jǐn)慎、懷疑的態(tài)度。持懷疑態(tài)度的學(xué)者們從語義學(xué)、思想史、研究取向等方面的質(zhì)疑雖然有理有據(jù),但不足以徹底否定“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義。比如,有學(xué)者以生態(tài)災(zāi)難的現(xiàn)實(shí)存在來否定“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義,這就忽略了另外一種可能,即正是因?yàn)椤疤烊撕弦弧彼枷胧轿?生態(tài)破壞才大行其道。持肯定態(tài)度的學(xué)者們以解讀經(jīng)典、引用古代法制等方式捍衛(wèi)“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義。不過,因部分內(nèi)容的邏輯鏈條不夠清晰或缺乏充分的論證,導(dǎo)致很多生態(tài)思想與“天人合一”之間的聯(lián)系不直觀,有過度解讀之嫌。當(dāng)然,有些內(nèi)容也確實(shí)體現(xiàn)出“天人合一”對保護(hù)生態(tài)的潛在貢獻(xiàn),如提升人類對自然的敬畏、樹立哲學(xué)整體觀等等。為避免理論的華而不實(shí),本文還將“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義放在生態(tài)學(xué)理論研究與治理生態(tài)的實(shí)踐環(huán)境下來分析、明確其現(xiàn)實(shí)作用。此外,本文還借“天人合一”其它內(nèi)涵對生態(tài)的積極貢獻(xiàn)來說明“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義有可能在不同層次、不同方面得以體現(xiàn)。最終,本文初步明確了“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義與現(xiàn)實(shí)作用:“天人合一”有可能通過提升人類對自然界的敬畏、樹立哲學(xué)整體觀、以修身來完善人們的精神境界尤其是道德修養(yǎng)等方式來影響與改變現(xiàn)代人的文化、思維方式和價(jià)值觀念,以期從根本上約束、指導(dǎo)人類的行為。最終阻止環(huán)境繼續(xù)遭到破壞,促進(jìn)生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的“自愈”,幫助有可能得以重生的生態(tài)環(huán)境盡量再現(xiàn)原貌,并為人工恢復(fù)與重建生態(tài)環(huán)境奠定基礎(chǔ)。同時(shí),“天人合一”的生態(tài)意義對生態(tài)學(xué)中專門研究人與自然關(guān)系的學(xué)科領(lǐng)域有可能給予理論上的貢獻(xiàn)或啟發(fā),并有可能為人類繼續(xù)探索生態(tài)環(huán)境惡化的深層次原因發(fā)揮作用。
[Abstract]:Scholars have been arguing about the ecological significance of "the unity of nature and man". Some scholars use a lot of arguments to prove the ecological significance of "the unity of man and nature" from many angles, and try to interpret "harmony of man and nature" as the harmony and symbiosis between man and nature. But other scholars think that the emphasis of "the unity of nature and man" is not the relationship between man and nature, but in the ethics of human relations, the purpose is to construct a moral system by virtue of the majesty of "heaven" and to maintain the feudal imperial rule. Therefore, these scholars advocate a cautious and sceptical attitude towards the so-called ecological meaning of the unity of nature and man. Sceptical scholars can not deny the ecological significance of "the unity of nature and man" from the aspects of semantics, ideological history, research orientation and so on. For example, some scholars negate the ecological significance of "harmony of nature and man" with the existence of ecological disaster, which ignores another possibility, that is, ecological destruction is widespread because the thought of "harmony of nature and man" is declining. Positive scholars defend the ecological significance of "harmony of nature and man" by interpreting classics and quoting ancient legal system. However, the logical chain of some contents is not clear enough or lack of sufficient argumentation, which leads to the fact that the connection between ecological thought and "harmony of nature and man" is not intuitionistic, and there is a suspicion of over-interpretation. Of course, some of the contents do reflect the potential contribution of "the unity of nature and man" to the conservation of ecology, such as raising the reverence of human beings to nature, setting up a philosophical view of the whole, and so on. In order to avoid the glittering of the theory, the ecological significance of "the unity of nature and man" is analyzed in the practical environment of ecological theory research and ecological governance, and its practical role is clarified. In addition, the paper also explains that the ecological significance of "the unity of man and nature" may be reflected in different levels and aspects by the positive contribution of other connotations to ecology. Finally, this paper makes clear the ecological significance and realistic function of "the unity of man and nature": "the unity of nature and man" may promote the awe of human beings to nature, and set up the whole view of philosophy. To improve people's spiritual state, especially moral cultivation, to influence and change the modern culture, mode of thinking and values, with a view to fundamentally constraining and guiding human behavior. Finally, it will prevent the environment from being destroyed, promote the "self-healing" of the ecosystem, help the ecological environment that may be reborn to reproduce the original appearance as much as possible, and lay the foundation for the artificial restoration and reconstruction of the ecological environment. At the same time, the ecological significance of "the unity of nature and man" may give theoretical contribution or inspiration to the subject field of ecology that specializes in the relationship between man and nature, and it may also play a role in exploring the deep-seated causes of the deterioration of ecological environment.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川省社會科學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B21;X2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張瓊;王博;王亮;邢丹;張春明;喬亞華;;切爾諾貝利和福島核事故后放射性土壤修復(fù)研究進(jìn)展[J];環(huán)境與可持續(xù)發(fā)展;2016年05期

2 張東軼;;反思天人合一的生態(tài)意義[J];中華文化論壇;2016年04期

3 胡萌萌;張雷剛;呂軍利;;從生態(tài)學(xué)到人類生態(tài)學(xué):人類生態(tài)覺醒的歷史考察[J];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2014年04期

4 金富平;;“天人合一”確切內(nèi)涵之界定——解析“天人合一”生態(tài)意義認(rèn)識分歧的癥結(jié)[J];河北學(xué)刊;2014年03期

5 楊拓;張德輝;;英國倫敦霧霾治理經(jīng)驗(yàn)及啟示[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2014年04期

6 張兵兵;徐康寧;陳庭強(qiáng);;技術(shù)進(jìn)步對二氧化碳排放強(qiáng)度的影響研究[J];資源科學(xué);2014年03期

7 林祥磊;;梭羅、�？藸柵c“生態(tài)學(xué)”一詞的提出[J];科學(xué)文化評論;2013年02期

8 李宗桂;;生態(tài)文明與中國文化的天人合一思想[J];哲學(xué)動態(tài);2012年06期

9 郝海燕;;儒家的“天人合一”與人和自然的和諧[J];哲學(xué)研究;2012年05期

10 劉笑敢;;天人合一:學(xué)術(shù)、學(xué)說和信仰——再論中國哲學(xué)之身份及研究取向的不同[J];南京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué).人文科學(xué).社會科學(xué)版);2011年06期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 徐羽宏;張曄;;貴州甕安：一座礦山挖掉地球6億年歷史[N];科技日報(bào);2017年

2 曹義孫;;誠：實(shí)與信[N];光明日報(bào);2013年

3 李申;;“天人合一”不是人與自然合一[N];中國社會科學(xué)院院報(bào);2005年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蒲創(chuàng)國;“天人合一”正義[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：1887736