本文選題：垃圾填埋場　切入點(diǎn)：經(jīng)濟(jì)效益　出處：《重慶工商大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著我國經(jīng)濟(jì)的快速發(fā)展和新型城鎮(zhèn)化進(jìn)程的不斷加深,人民的生活水平不斷提高,生活垃圾的產(chǎn)量也與日俱增,“垃圾圍城”的困境正日益成為當(dāng)下亟待解決的環(huán)保難題。當(dāng)前我國主要采取衛(wèi)生填埋方式處理生活垃圾,當(dāng)垃圾填埋場填埋飽和時(shí)要關(guān)閉停止使用并進(jìn)行封場管理,以此控制環(huán)境污染、抑制疾病傳播、促進(jìn)生態(tài)恢復(fù)和加快土地恢復(fù)利用。對封場項(xiàng)目的投資方案進(jìn)行評價(jià)研究,根據(jù)評價(jià)結(jié)果選取綜合效益最佳的投資方案是科學(xué)合理的進(jìn)行封場的關(guān)鍵。在實(shí)際生活中,垃圾填埋場封場項(xiàng)目基于經(jīng)濟(jì)效益、環(huán)境效益和社會(huì)效益的綜合效益是決定該類項(xiàng)目投資決策的關(guān)鍵因素。為此,論文梳理了國內(nèi)外關(guān)于垃圾填埋場的研究進(jìn)展和項(xiàng)目效益的研究進(jìn)展,介紹了封場的相關(guān)概念、投資方案和投資方案評價(jià)的相關(guān)概念,分析了垃圾填埋場封場項(xiàng)目的投資特點(diǎn)和垃圾填埋場封場項(xiàng)目投資評價(jià)要素,在綜合考慮經(jīng)濟(jì)效益、環(huán)境效益、社會(huì)效益的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合評價(jià)指標(biāo)的選取原則和步驟,建立了3個(gè)層次3個(gè)因素12個(gè)指標(biāo)的垃圾填埋場封場項(xiàng)目投資方案綜合效益評價(jià)指標(biāo)體系;通過比較主觀賦值法和客觀賦值法各自的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)后選定主觀賦值法中的層次分析法作為指標(biāo)權(quán)重的確定方法,并按照層次分析法的步驟確定了指標(biāo)權(quán)重;通過比較投資效益綜合評價(jià)的幾種常用方法的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)后選取模糊層次綜合評價(jià)法作為垃圾填埋場封場項(xiàng)目投資方案綜合效益的評價(jià)方法,并依據(jù)模糊層次綜合評價(jià)法的步驟建立了評價(jià)模型,用評價(jià)模型對垃圾填埋場封場項(xiàng)目投資方案的效益進(jìn)行了綜合評價(jià);最后結(jié)合實(shí)際案例運(yùn)用評價(jià)模型對投資方案進(jìn)行評價(jià)研究得出評價(jià)結(jié)果,驗(yàn)證了該方法的科學(xué)性和實(shí)用性,能為此類項(xiàng)目的投資決策提供參考。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the rapid development of our economy and the deepening of the new urbanization process, the living standards of the people have been continuously improved. The production of domestic waste is also increasing, and the plight of "garbage besieging" is becoming an urgent environmental problem to be solved. Currently, sanitary landfills are mainly used to dispose of domestic waste in China. In order to control environmental pollution, restrain the spread of disease, promote ecological restoration and accelerate land restoration and utilization, the landfill landfill should be closed and closed when landfill is saturated, and the investment scheme of the project should be evaluated and studied, so as to control the environmental pollution, restrain the spread of disease, promote ecological restoration and accelerate the utilization of land. According to the evaluation results, it is the key to select the best comprehensive benefit investment scheme to seal the site scientifically and reasonably. In actual life, the landfill sealing project is based on economic benefits. The comprehensive benefit of environmental and social benefits is the key factor to decide the investment decision of this kind of project. Therefore, this paper reviews the research progress of landfill site at home and abroad and the research progress of project benefit, and introduces the related concepts of sealing site. The related concepts of investment scheme and investment scheme evaluation are analyzed. The investment characteristics and investment evaluation elements of landfill sealing project are analyzed. On the basis of comprehensive consideration of economic benefit, environmental benefit and social benefit, Combined with the selection principles and steps of the evaluation index, the comprehensive benefit evaluation index system of the landfill sealing project investment scheme was established with 3 levels, 3 factors and 12 indexes. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of subjective assignment method and objective assignment method, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in subjective assignment method is selected as the determination method of index weight, and the index weight is determined according to the steps of AHP. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of several common methods of comprehensive evaluation of investment benefit, the fuzzy level comprehensive evaluation method is selected as the comprehensive benefit evaluation method for the investment scheme of landfill sealing project. The evaluation model is established according to the steps of the fuzzy hierarchy comprehensive evaluation method, and the benefit of the investment scheme of the landfill sealing project is comprehensively evaluated by the evaluation model. Finally, the evaluation results are obtained by using the evaluation model in actual cases, which verifies the scientificity and practicability of the method, and can provide a reference for the investment decision of this kind of projects.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：重慶工商大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：X705;F285

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王俊林;譚榮建;;基于AHP-熵權(quán)物元評判模型的土地整理綜合效益評價(jià)[J];浙江農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2017年02期

2 管強(qiáng);王文文;關(guān)濤;宋榮偉;周勇;;配電網(wǎng)項(xiàng)目投資綜合效益評價(jià)體系研究[J];管理觀察;2017年04期

3 國靖;汪貴斌;封超年;曹福亮;;銀杏林下經(jīng)濟(jì)模式分類及模式綜合效益評價(jià)[J];中南林業(yè)科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2017年01期

4 李存弟;;簡易垃圾填埋場綜合治理研究[J];資源節(jié)約與環(huán)保;2016年07期

5 孫向輝;周麗貞;;垃圾填埋場植被恢復(fù)技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2016年09期

6 馬世龍;吳航;翟強(qiáng)強(qiáng);;生活垃圾填埋場封場治理環(huán)境管理對策[J];中國資源綜合利用;2015年12期

7 鄭曉笛;;關(guān)注棕地再生的英文博士論文及規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)類著作綜述[J];中國園林;2013年02期

8 孟夢;邵春福;董春嬌;胡超凡;劉新華;;城市道路建設(shè)序列決策DEA/TOPSIS組合模型[J];交通運(yùn)輸系統(tǒng)工程與信息;2011年03期

9 莊秋松;;蒼南縣狀元內(nèi)生活垃圾填埋場封場工程實(shí)例[J];北方環(huán)境;2011年05期

10 楊銳;王浩;;景觀突圍:城市垃圾填埋場的生態(tài)恢復(fù)與景觀重建[J];城市發(fā)展研究;2010年08期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 周婷;土地綜合整治項(xiàng)目效益評價(jià)研究[D];長沙理工大學(xué);2013年

2 黃蘭華;公路建設(shè)項(xiàng)目效益后評價(jià)研究[D];長安大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1626395