本文關(guān)鍵詞： 環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織 重慶生態(tài)治理 能力建設(shè)　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來,隨著我國(guó)不斷的改革開放,各個(gè)領(lǐng)域都進(jìn)入了轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期。生態(tài)文明建設(shè)從頂層設(shè)計(jì)階段逐步轉(zhuǎn)入方案的具體落實(shí)時(shí)期,一系列政策不斷落地。社會(huì)組織的發(fā)展壯大,使得重慶生態(tài)文明建設(shè)走上了新的征程。改革開放30年,中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)不斷的以較高速度在增長(zhǎng),但同時(shí)生態(tài)問題也越來越嚴(yán)重,生態(tài)環(huán)境再也承擔(dān)不起這種消耗式的發(fā)展道路。中國(guó)迫切呼喚用生態(tài)治理的方式來化解這場(chǎng)風(fēng)波。十八大報(bào)告更是將生態(tài)建設(shè)納入發(fā)展的總體布局,形成政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化、社會(huì)、生態(tài)建設(shè)五位一體并列發(fā)展的新格局。在此背景之下,環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織的參與,勢(shì)必會(huì)改變生態(tài)治理的局面,形成多元共治的新格局,給現(xiàn)階段的重慶生態(tài)治理注入新的活力。本研究首先在分析生態(tài)治理背景和重慶生態(tài)治理的客觀現(xiàn)狀,分析現(xiàn)行政府的政策指引的方向,為本研究找到政策依據(jù),在此基礎(chǔ)上展開文獻(xiàn)研究,在理論上為本研究找到依據(jù)和支撐。為什么要進(jìn)行能力的建設(shè),以及要建設(shè)怎樣的能力,是本研究所要解決的核心問題,在第三章,本研究首先從重慶生態(tài)治理和環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織參與的現(xiàn)狀入手分析了現(xiàn)狀,明確了環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織參與重慶生態(tài)治理的客觀現(xiàn)實(shí),建設(shè)緣由以及能力建設(shè)的價(jià)值和重要性。在解決能力建設(shè)緣由的基礎(chǔ)上,本研究積極探索環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織要建設(shè)怎樣的能力才能更好的開展生態(tài)治理。通過訪談和文獻(xiàn)研究,得出亟需建設(shè)的三種能力:專業(yè)能力、共治能力和發(fā)展能力。明確了這三種能力,那么如何建設(shè)能力又是本研究接下來要解決的問題。本研究找到影響能力建設(shè)的四種因素,構(gòu)建模型,提出假設(shè),用實(shí)證研究的方法找到制約環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織能力建設(shè)的因素,并在此基礎(chǔ)上探究解決方案,最終形成對(duì)于環(huán)保類社會(huì)組織參與重慶生態(tài)治理的能力假設(shè)的政策建議與保障其能力建設(shè)的保障機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the continuous reform and opening up in China, all fields have entered a critical period of transition and development. The construction of ecological civilization has gradually shifted from the top design stage to the concrete implementation period of the plan. A series of policies continue to fall to the ground. The development of social organizations makes the construction of ecological civilization in Chongqing embark on a new journey. 30 years of reform and opening up, China's economy continues to grow at a higher speed. But at the same time, ecological problems are becoming more and more serious. The ecological environment can no longer afford this kind of consumptive way of development. China urgently calls for the way of ecological governance to resolve the storm. 18 report will bring ecological construction into the overall layout of development and form politics. Under this background, the participation of environmental protection social organizations will inevitably change the situation of ecological governance and form a new pattern of pluralistic and co-governance. This study first analyzes the background of ecological governance and the objective situation of ecological governance in Chongqing, and analyzes the direction of the current government policy guidance. To find the policy basis for this study, on the basis of literature research, in theory for this study to find the basis and support. Why to build capacity, and what kind of capacity to build. It is the core problem to be solved in this research. In the third chapter, this study first analyzes the status quo of the participation of ecological governance and environmental protection social organizations in Chongqing. It clarifies the objective reality, the cause of construction and the value and importance of capacity building of environmental protection social organizations participating in ecological governance in Chongqing. On the basis of solving the causes of capacity building. This study actively explores what kind of capacity environmental protection social organizations should build in order to better develop ecological governance. Through interviews and literature research, we can get three kinds of abilities that need to be built: professional ability. The co-treatment ability and development ability. Identified these three capabilities, then how to build capacity is the next problem to be solved in this study. This study found four factors that affect capacity building, build the model, put forward the hypothesis. Using the method of empirical research to find the constraints of environmental protection social organization capacity building factors, and on this basis to explore solutions. Finally, the policy recommendations on the assumption of the ability of environmental protection social organizations to participate in the ecological governance of Chongqing and the guarantee mechanism of ensuring their capacity construction are formed.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：X321;D632.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李祥祥;;我國(guó)環(huán)保社會(huì)組織的生態(tài)治理功能定位[J];華北電力大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年05期

2 朱宗友;張繼龍;;國(guó)內(nèi)關(guān)于“五大發(fā)展理念”研究述評(píng)[J];社會(huì)主義研究;2016年03期

3 黃曉春;;當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)組織的制度環(huán)境與發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2015年09期

4 馬慶鈺;賈西津;;中國(guó)社會(huì)組織的發(fā)展方向與未來趨勢(shì)[J];國(guó)家行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

5 吳結(jié)兵;沈臺(tái)鳳;;社會(huì)組織促進(jìn)居民主動(dòng)參與社會(huì)治理研究[J];管理世界;2015年08期

6 王詩宗;宋程成;許鹿;;中國(guó)社會(huì)組織多重特征的機(jī)制性分析[J];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué);2014年12期

7 黃曉春;嵇欣;;非協(xié)同治理與策略性應(yīng)對(duì)——社會(huì)組織自主性研究的一個(gè)理論框架[J];社會(huì)學(xué)研究;2014年06期

8 馬立;曹錦清;;基層社會(huì)組織生長(zhǎng)的政策支持:基于資源依賴的視角[J];上海行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年06期

9 汪錦軍;張長(zhǎng)東;;縱向橫向網(wǎng)絡(luò)中的社會(huì)組織與政府互動(dòng)機(jī)制——基于行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)行為策略的多案例比較研究[J];公共行政評(píng)論;2014年05期

10 王向民;;分類治理與體制擴(kuò)容:當(dāng)前中國(guó)的社會(huì)組織治理[J];華東師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 湯瑜;;王名：加強(qiáng)慈善信息平臺(tái)建設(shè)和監(jiān)管[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2017年

2 王會(huì)賢;皮磊;;王名：加快社會(huì)組織基本法立法[N];公益時(shí)報(bào);2017年

3 顧磊;趙瑩瑩;舒迪;;“社會(huì)組織是扶貧開發(fā)中不可忽視的力量”[N];人民政協(xié)報(bào);2015年

4 鄭英 ;王珊珊;;社會(huì)組織應(yīng)成為社會(huì)改革的領(lǐng)路羊[N];深圳商報(bào);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1452101