本文關(guān)鍵詞： 環(huán)評審批 司法審查 建設(shè)項目環(huán)評 行政訴訟　出處：《政治與法律》2017年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：環(huán)評審批是環(huán)保部門依職權(quán)作出的具有高度科技專業(yè)性的行政行為,法院如何審查高度科技專業(yè)性行政行為值得關(guān)注。通過分析我國的62起環(huán)評行政訴訟案件可以發(fā)現(xiàn):在實體審查方面,法院往往以欠缺相關(guān)的知識與技術(shù)為由,采取尊重行政機關(guān)的專業(yè)性判斷的態(tài)度;在程序?qū)彶榉矫?法院僅審查程序是否形式合法,而不過問程序是否實質(zhì)合法或是否正當。司法審查的退讓使得針對環(huán)評審批的司法監(jiān)督名存實亡,環(huán)評審批權(quán)在"科技專業(yè)性"的遮掩下不斷被濫用。為制約行政權(quán),確保環(huán)評預防環(huán)境污染與生態(tài)破壞功能的發(fā)揮,法院應(yīng)將審查的重點放在程序上,在程序?qū)彶橹凶裱斝姓绦驑藴?同時,亦應(yīng)在實體審查中確立合理性審查標準。
[Abstract]:EIA examination and approval is a highly scientific and professional administrative act made by the environmental protection department in accordance with its authority. By analyzing 62 administrative litigation cases of environmental impact assessment in China, it can be found that: in the aspect of entity review. Courts often take the attitude of respecting the professional judgment of administrative organs on the basis of lack of relevant knowledge and technology; In the aspect of procedural review, the court only reviews whether the procedure is legal, but not whether the procedure is actually legal or legitimate. The concession of judicial review makes the judicial supervision of EIA examination and approval exist in name. In order to restrict the administrative power and ensure the function of environmental impact assessment to prevent environmental pollution and ecological destruction, the court should focus on the procedure. The standard of due administrative procedure should be followed in the examination of procedure, and the standard of reasonableness should also be established in the examination of entity.
【作者單位】： 常州大學史良法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金項目“環(huán)境影響評價的司法審查研究”(項目編號:13XFX010)的研究成果之一
【分類號】：D922.68;D925.3
【正文快照】： 環(huán)境損害一旦發(fā)生,往往難以消除和恢復或者雖能消除和恢復但耗資巨大。環(huán)境影響評價(以下簡稱:環(huán)評)作為從源頭預防和減輕環(huán)境污染的“閥門”,是環(huán)境保護法的重要制度。(1)在大部分國家和地區(qū)環(huán)評文件是由建設(shè)單位編制的情形下,勢必需要一道對環(huán)評文件進行行政審批的控制程序，

本文編號：1451277