本文關(guān)鍵詞：中國(guó)工業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的行業(yè)差異及收斂性研究　出處：《中國(guó)人口·資源與環(huán)境》2017年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度 泰爾指數(shù) σ收斂 β收斂

【摘要】：針對(duì)不同行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的差異性,本文運(yùn)用收斂理論研究了行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的斂散性。傳統(tǒng)上利用單位成本或產(chǎn)出的污染治理費(fèi)用表示的行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度可能存在有偏性,本文基于單位污染排放的污染治理費(fèi)用測(cè)算行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度,利用Theil指數(shù)和收斂檢驗(yàn)?zāi)Ｐ?分析了2001—2015年中國(guó)35個(gè)工業(yè)行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度差異、收斂性質(zhì)及收斂機(jī)制。研究發(fā)現(xiàn):(1)一些行業(yè)的環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度與其污染強(qiáng)度未表現(xiàn)出相應(yīng)的強(qiáng)關(guān)聯(lián)性。(2)中國(guó)工業(yè)行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度差異呈現(xiàn)"M"型變化趨勢(shì),污染行業(yè)與清潔行業(yè)之間的環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度差異呈現(xiàn)先發(fā)散后收斂的倒"U"型趨勢(shì)。(3)泰爾指數(shù)及其分解還表明,污染行業(yè)內(nèi)部的子行業(yè)間環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度差異很大,且是造成工業(yè)行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度差異的最主要來源。(4)工業(yè)行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度存在較長(zhǎng)時(shí)段的σ收斂和較短時(shí)長(zhǎng)的俱樂部收斂的同時(shí),還存在絕對(duì)β收斂和條件β收斂,即低規(guī)制行業(yè)向高規(guī)制行業(yè)看齊,不同行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度向各自的穩(wěn)態(tài)水平靠近,此外,污染行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度收斂速度慢于清潔行業(yè)。(5)企業(yè)規(guī)模成長(zhǎng)和市場(chǎng)化水平提升有利于促進(jìn)企業(yè)提高環(huán)境規(guī)制水平。(6)對(duì)收斂機(jī)制的進(jìn)一步研究表明,出口學(xué)習(xí)效應(yīng)和進(jìn)口技術(shù)溢出對(duì)行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度變化的提升效應(yīng)隨著環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度的提高而擴(kuò)大,即兩者對(duì)行業(yè)環(huán)境規(guī)制強(qiáng)度變化具有提升效應(yīng),但無促進(jìn)其收斂的作用。擴(kuò)大企業(yè)規(guī)模、提升市場(chǎng)化和對(duì)外開放水平,有利于提升企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)環(huán)境規(guī)制的能力,并為下一階段實(shí)施更為合理有效的環(huán)境規(guī)制政策提供支撐。
[Abstract]:Aiming at the difference of environmental regulation intensity in different industries. In this paper, convergence theory is used to study the convergence and divergence of industry environmental regulation intensity. Traditionally, the industry environmental regulation intensity expressed by unit cost or output pollution treatment cost may be biased. This paper uses Theil index and convergence test model to calculate the intensity of environmental regulation based on the pollution control cost per unit of pollution emissions. This paper analyzes the difference of environmental regulation intensity in 35 industrial industries in China from 2001 to 2015. Convergence property and Convergence Mechanism. The study found that the environmental regulation intensity and pollution intensity of some industries did not show the corresponding strong correlation. The difference of environmental regulation intensity of China's industrial industry shows the trend of "M" type change. The difference of environmental regulation intensity between pollution industry and clean industry showed an inverted "U" type trend of first divergence and then convergence.) Tyr index and its decomposition also showed that. There is a great difference in the intensity of environmental regulation among the sub-industries within the pollution industry. And it is the most important source of the difference of environmental regulation intensity of industrial industry. 4) the environmental regulation intensity of industrial industry has a long period of 蟽 convergence and a short time of club convergence at the same time. There is also absolute 尾 convergence and conditional 尾 convergence, that is, the low regulation industry is in line with the high regulation industry, and the environmental regulation intensity of different industries is close to their respective steady state level, in addition. The convergence rate of environmental regulation intensity in pollution industry is slower than that in clean industry. (5) the growth of enterprise scale and the promotion of market-oriented level will promote the improvement of environmental regulation level. Further research on the convergence mechanism shows that. The effects of export learning and import technology spillover on the trade environmental regulation intensity increase with the increase of the environmental regulation intensity, that is to say, both of them have the enhancement effect on the industry environmental regulation intensity change. But it has no effect of promoting its convergence. Expanding the scale of enterprises, improving the level of marketization and opening to the outside world will help to enhance the ability of enterprises to deal with environmental regulation. And provide support for the implementation of more reasonable and effective environmental regulation policy in the next stage.
【作者單位】： 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“供給側(cè)結(jié)構(gòu)性改革背景下制造業(yè)出口質(zhì)量提升對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)波動(dòng)的影響”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):17BJL013),“碳生產(chǎn)率變動(dòng)對(duì)制造業(yè)出口質(zhì)量演進(jìn)的影響研究”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):14BJL058) 中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)研究生教育創(chuàng)新基金專項(xiàng)資助項(xiàng)目“創(chuàng)業(yè)、創(chuàng)新與出口增長(zhǎng)”(批準(zhǔn)號(hào):2015BZ0301)
【分類號(hào)】：F424;X322
【正文快照】： “波特假說”和“污染避難所假說”提出以來,學(xué)術(shù)界著重關(guān)注環(huán)境規(guī)制政策和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)引致的經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)效應(yīng),包括技術(shù)進(jìn)步效應(yīng)[1-2]、全要素生產(chǎn)率效應(yīng)[3-4]、貿(mào)易效應(yīng)[5-7]、產(chǎn)業(yè)結(jié)構(gòu)效應(yīng)[8]、就業(yè)效應(yīng)[9],從各角度檢驗(yàn)環(huán)境規(guī)制產(chǎn)生的正負(fù)影響及其機(jī)制。但隨著我國(guó)向工業(yè)化中后期階段

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王萬(wàn)山;對(duì)我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制主體制度優(yōu)化的建議[J];中國(guó)環(huán)保產(chǎn)業(yè);2004年04期

2 陳宇學(xué);;環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)企業(yè)創(chuàng)新的影響[J];資源再生;2008年11期

3 尹顯萍;;環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)貿(mào)易的影響——以中國(guó)與歐盟商品貿(mào)易為例[J];世界經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2008年07期

4 王愛蘭;;論政府環(huán)境規(guī)制與企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的提升——基于“波特假設(shè)”理論驗(yàn)證的影響因素分析[J];天津大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年05期

5 郭慶;;環(huán)境規(guī)制中的規(guī)制俘獲與對(duì)策研究[J];山東經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年02期

6 郭慶;;世界各國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制的演進(jìn)與啟示[J];東岳論叢;2009年06期

7 劉研華;王宏志;;我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制效率的變化趨勢(shì)及對(duì)策研究[J];生態(tài)經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年11期

8 趙玉民;朱方明;賀立龍;;環(huán)境規(guī)制的界定、分類與演進(jìn)研究[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2009年06期

9 薛偉賢;劉靜;;環(huán)境規(guī)制及其在中國(guó)的評(píng)估[J];中國(guó)人口.資源與環(huán)境;2010年09期

10 葉祥松;彭良燕;;我國(guó)環(huán)境規(guī)制的規(guī)制效率研究——基于1999—2008年我國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家;2011年06期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前8條

1 奧野利文;;日本の環(huán)境規(guī)制[A];中國(guó)聚氨酯工業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)第十三次年會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

2 孫林霞;吳獻(xiàn)金;;湖南省環(huán)境規(guī)制與外商直接投資的協(xié)整分析[A];2006年中國(guó)可持續(xù)發(fā)展論壇——中國(guó)可持續(xù)發(fā)展研究會(huì)2006學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展與人文關(guān)懷專輯[C];2006年

3 葉祥松;;不同環(huán)境規(guī)制下的規(guī)制效率與全要素生產(chǎn)率研究——基于我國(guó)東、中、西部地區(qū)1999-2008年的實(shí)證分析[A];市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)與增長(zhǎng)質(zhì)量——2013年嶺南經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇暨廣東經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)會(huì)年會(huì)論文集[C];2013年

4 王嶺;;環(huán)境規(guī)制、公眾參與和環(huán)境污染治理——基于中國(guó)省際面板數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證分析[A];2010年中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)組織前沿論壇會(huì)議文集[C];2010年

5 曾文慧;;流域越界污染規(guī)制:對(duì)中國(guó)跨省水污染的實(shí)證研究[A];經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)（季刊）第7卷第2期[C];2008年

6 肖鵬;胡許萍;;環(huán)境規(guī)制差異對(duì)我國(guó)跨國(guó)企業(yè)技術(shù)創(chuàng)新的影響:基于海爾的探索性案例研究[A];第八屆（2013）中國(guó)管理學(xué)年會(huì)——管理案例研究分會(huì)場(chǎng)論文集[C];2013年

7 葉元煦;汪濤;韓威;;大國(guó)區(qū)域間經(jīng)濟(jì)與環(huán)境可持續(xù)發(fā)展對(duì)策分析[A];系統(tǒng)工程與可持續(xù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略——中國(guó)系統(tǒng)工程學(xué)會(huì)第十屆年會(huì)論文集[C];1998年

8 傅京燕;李麗莎;江榕;;環(huán)境規(guī)制對(duì)企業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的影響:對(duì)波特假說的檢驗(yàn)——以東風(fēng)日產(chǎn)乘用車公司開展節(jié)能減排為例[A];發(fā)展現(xiàn)代產(chǎn)業(yè)體系 提高產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力——中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)論（第三輯）[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 張Z，

本文編號(hào)：1421259