淺談釋量論之禮贊
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-27 08:21
【摘要】：禮贊是趣入經(jīng)典三門之一,通過三門或三門之一撰寫文化,不但是古印度和藏族先輩作家們與眾不同的傳統(tǒng)寫作格式,并且是識別作者和其著作歸屬內(nèi)外何道的重要標(biāo)志。釋量論的禮贊作為一種特殊而富有深意的禮贊,具有其他經(jīng)典沒有的三門集一體之特點。筆者擬將禮贊概述和《釋量論》禮贊詳解兩部分來完論述。目前我所見到的關(guān)于禮贊方面的文章只少之又少,而且這些文章不完善和不具深度的弊端。所以本文將分禮贊分為最初形成原因,禮贊名之寓意,禮贊的對象,禮贊的分類及必要性等五部分進(jìn)行詳細(xì)論述。釋量論的禮贊在《釋量論》釋疏中只有少許論述外,沒有進(jìn)行專題研究。而釋文的作者也只以自己的理解字面解釋,而沒有深入探討和詳盡的研究。為了了解主要釋文之間的不同之處,及其釋義是否是否相駁作了探討,提出自己的看法。本文屬駁論文章,駁論文不外乎反駁他人的觀點,樹立自己的觀點。這兩者不管是哪一個,都需要正確的論據(jù)。論據(jù)分理論論據(jù)和類推論據(jù)兩種。這里依靠理論和類推兩種論據(jù)闡述了自己的新觀點。更是通過現(xiàn)代學(xué)術(shù)論文的寫作方法,運用提出問題,分析問題,解決問題的方法,多方角度去解釋和辨析禮贊的寓意。這便是這篇論文的新穎和開創(chuàng)之處。關(guān)于論文創(chuàng)新之處:(1)在論述禮贊產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展問題時提出禮贊最初出現(xiàn)于何種論典。在論述“禮贊”名表示何義和禮贊對象時,提出“禮贊”的不同對象,即何可禮贊、何不可禮贊。(2)禮贊的分類,雖在一般釋文來曾提到,可實際釋文中,可分為三種,一是按文章文體分類、二是按禮贊文體分類、三是按文章與禮贊是否統(tǒng)一方面分類。(3)作禮贊的必要性方面,此非物力比量此認(rèn)識的對象,只有從三量洞察清凈之圣言去認(rèn)識。(4)在分析《釋量論》禮贊時,主要對不同釋文的解說進(jìn)行比較,分析它們之間是否相度還是相違,提出了自己的看法。(5)在探討自宗的詮釋法時,分析了從實際禮贊詮釋、從皈依聲語門詮釋、從文章體裁詮釋、從《釋量論》四品次第詮釋、從講釋經(jīng)論五分支法詮釋等方法,對《釋量論》禮贊作了力所能及的探討,提出來自己的看法。請各位教授專家批評指正。
[Abstract]:Praise is one of the three branches of the classics. Writing culture through one of the three or one of the three is not only the unique traditional writing format of the ancient Indian and Tibetan writers, but also an important symbol to identify the author and his works belonging to the inside and outside. As a kind of special and profound praise, the praise of the interpretation of quantity theory has the characteristics of the integration of the three gates which are not found in other classics. The author intends to complete the discussion in two parts: the outline of Raizhuan and the detailed explanation of Raizan. There are very few articles I have seen about praise, and they are imperfect and flawed. Therefore, this paper divides into five parts: the initial formation reason, the moral of praise name, the object of praise, the classification and necessity of praise. There are only a few expositions in the explanation of quantity theory, and no special research is carried out. However, the author of the interpretation only interprets it literally, without further exploration and detailed study. In order to understand the differences between the main interpretations and whether the interpretation is contradictory, the author puts forward his own views. This article is a refutation of articles, refuting the views of others, to establish their own views. Either of these two needs the right argument. There are two kinds of arguments: theoretical arguments and analogies. Here rely on theory and analogies two kinds of argument to expound own new viewpoint. Through the writing method of modern academic papers, it uses the methods of asking questions, analyzing problems, solving problems, explaining and discriminating the moral of praise from various angles. This is the novelty and creation of this paper. The innovations of the thesis are as follows: (1) when discussing the emergence and development of praise, the author puts forward the initial exposition of praise. In discussing the meaning and object of "praise", it is proposed that the different objects of "praise", that is, what can be praised and what cannot be praised. (2) although the classification of praise has been mentioned in the general interpretation, it can be divided into three types in the actual interpretation. First, according to the style of the article, second, according to the style of praise, third, according to whether the article and praise are unified or not. (3) the necessity of being complimentary, this is not the material resources to measure the object of this understanding, Only from three insights into the pure holy words to understand. (4) in the analysis of the "release of quantity" praise, mainly on the interpretation of different interpretations to compare, to analyze whether they are degree or not, The author puts forward his own views. (5) in discussing the hermeneutics of self-hermeneutics, this paper analyzes the interpretation from the actual praise, from the door of conversion, from the genre of the article, from the interpretation of the four articles, from the interpretation of the Sutra, from the interpretation of the five branches, etc. In this paper, the author discusses how much he can and puts forward his own views. Professors and experts are invited to criticize and correct.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青海民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B948
本文編號：2206666
[Abstract]:Praise is one of the three branches of the classics. Writing culture through one of the three or one of the three is not only the unique traditional writing format of the ancient Indian and Tibetan writers, but also an important symbol to identify the author and his works belonging to the inside and outside. As a kind of special and profound praise, the praise of the interpretation of quantity theory has the characteristics of the integration of the three gates which are not found in other classics. The author intends to complete the discussion in two parts: the outline of Raizhuan and the detailed explanation of Raizan. There are very few articles I have seen about praise, and they are imperfect and flawed. Therefore, this paper divides into five parts: the initial formation reason, the moral of praise name, the object of praise, the classification and necessity of praise. There are only a few expositions in the explanation of quantity theory, and no special research is carried out. However, the author of the interpretation only interprets it literally, without further exploration and detailed study. In order to understand the differences between the main interpretations and whether the interpretation is contradictory, the author puts forward his own views. This article is a refutation of articles, refuting the views of others, to establish their own views. Either of these two needs the right argument. There are two kinds of arguments: theoretical arguments and analogies. Here rely on theory and analogies two kinds of argument to expound own new viewpoint. Through the writing method of modern academic papers, it uses the methods of asking questions, analyzing problems, solving problems, explaining and discriminating the moral of praise from various angles. This is the novelty and creation of this paper. The innovations of the thesis are as follows: (1) when discussing the emergence and development of praise, the author puts forward the initial exposition of praise. In discussing the meaning and object of "praise", it is proposed that the different objects of "praise", that is, what can be praised and what cannot be praised. (2) although the classification of praise has been mentioned in the general interpretation, it can be divided into three types in the actual interpretation. First, according to the style of the article, second, according to the style of praise, third, according to whether the article and praise are unified or not. (3) the necessity of being complimentary, this is not the material resources to measure the object of this understanding, Only from three insights into the pure holy words to understand. (4) in the analysis of the "release of quantity" praise, mainly on the interpretation of different interpretations to compare, to analyze whether they are degree or not, The author puts forward his own views. (5) in discussing the hermeneutics of self-hermeneutics, this paper analyzes the interpretation from the actual praise, from the door of conversion, from the genre of the article, from the interpretation of the four articles, from the interpretation of the Sutra, from the interpretation of the five branches, etc. In this paper, the author discusses how much he can and puts forward his own views. Professors and experts are invited to criticize and correct.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：青海民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：B948
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 日進(jìn);;《釋量論》已經(jīng)出版[J];法音;1982年03期
2 胡繼歐;;緬懷恩師尊公上人[J];法音;1991年02期
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前2條
1 西藏自治區(qū)古籍保護(hù)中心 白張 薩仁高娃;西藏博物館藏《釋量論》元至元間第三帝師達(dá)瑪巴拉大都刻本[N];光明日報;2013年
2 柯志雄;林清渠：飲水思佛源[N];21世紀(jì)經(jīng)濟報道;2008年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 才讓當(dāng)知;淺談釋量論之禮贊[D];青海民族大學(xué);2017年
2 彭毛卡先;“量識”是否必為“新知”探析[D];青海民族大學(xué);2012年
，本文編號：2206666
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zjlw/2206666.html
