冷戰(zhàn)的宗教起源與宗教批評——由教宗庇護十二世到修士默頓的天主教思想傳統(tǒng)
發(fā)布時間:2018-06-25 23:30
本文選題:冷戰(zhàn) + 天主教。 參考:《南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報》2017年01期
【摘要】:冷戰(zhàn)的意識形態(tài)起源遠比人們通常想象的要復(fù)雜。由于社會主義運動廣泛的國際影響,兩大陣營的意識形態(tài)分歧之中其實存在著對話與溝通的潛在空間?上У氖,這一理論上存在的和平互動可能性并沒有能夠在國際政治中較快地轉(zhuǎn)化為現(xiàn)實。在二戰(zhàn)以后東西方關(guān)系迅速惡化的進程中,羅馬天主教會與蘇聯(lián)的困難關(guān)系既出自"主義"之分歧,也有具體的政治和政策的因素。在蘇聯(lián)與教廷之間,基于意識形態(tài)對立形成的緊張對峙原本可以通過對話協(xié)調(diào),但是卻因為政治和政策的因素自20世紀20年代后期開始不斷惡化,在庇護十二世在職期間達到十分嚴重的地步。而在約翰二十三世1958年就職以后,這一態(tài)勢開始逐漸改變。以美國修士托馬斯·默頓為代表的天主教反戰(zhàn)和平人士尖銳地批評冷戰(zhàn)和越南戰(zhàn)爭,并且質(zhì)疑資本主義社會的一些本質(zhì)屬性。他們堅持認為,牢固的世界和平必須建立在正義的社會和國際秩序之上。
[Abstract]:The ideological origins of the cold war are much more complex than is commonly thought. Due to the extensive international influence of the socialist movement, there is in fact a potential space for dialogue and communication in the ideological differences between the two camps. Unfortunately, this theoretical possibility of peaceful interaction has not been translated more quickly into reality in international politics. In the course of the rapid deterioration of East-West relations after World War II, the difficult relationship between the Roman Catholic Church and the Soviet Union came from the differences of "doctrine" and specific political and policy factors. The tense confrontation between the Soviet Union and the Holy see, based on ideological antagonism, could have been reconciled through dialogue, but it has worsened since the late 1920s because of political and policy factors. It reached a very serious point during the tenure of asylum XII. But after John 23 took office in 1958, this situation began to change gradually. Catholic anti-war peacemakers represented by American monk Thomas Merton sharply criticized the Cold War and the Vietnam War and questioned some essential attributes of capitalist society. They insisted that a firm world peace must be based on a just social and international order.
【作者單位】: 北京大學(xué)歷史學(xué)系;
【分類號】:B976.1
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 夏洞奇;天主的“沉默”[N];東方早報;2011年
,本文編號:2068004
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zjlw/2068004.html