本文選題：儒家 + “五倫”　； 參考：《西北民族大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】：在傳統(tǒng)的中國文化中,儒家的倫理道德思想為其打上了深深的烙印,影響著人們的社會道德和倫理生活。同時作為禮儀之邦的文明古國,也以她博大的胸懷接納、吸收和融合了許多外來文化中的優(yōu)秀成分。在眾多外來文化中,中國伊斯蘭文化就是一個典型的代表之一。作為一種外來宗教的意識形態(tài),為了順利的在中國生存和發(fā)展下去,就必然要與中國本土的思想意識相碰撞、融合。明清時期的一些中國穆斯林學(xué)者利用自身所擁有的伊斯蘭文明和中華文明的雙重文化底蘊,他們以漢語言文字為載體,將伊斯蘭教的經(jīng)典和經(jīng)院哲學(xué)作品翻譯成漢語,然后進一步結(jié)合儒家思想并在此基礎(chǔ)上著書立說,以實際行動開啟了歷史上的“回儒對話”。歷史上的“回儒對話”,推動了伊斯蘭教的中國化和本土化進程,進一步鞏固了置身于漢文化汪洋大海中的回族穆斯林移民群體對中華文化的適應(yīng)。 本文從“人倫”入手,通過對儒家的“五倫”思想與中國伊斯蘭“五典”思想的比較,試圖找出它們之間的異同,希望對現(xiàn)今所探討的宗教信仰與國家認(rèn)同的關(guān)系問題起到一定的借鑒意義。 本文以史料分析和比較研究為方法,以唯物史觀為指導(dǎo),對前人的觀點進行梳理、歸納和總結(jié),本文分為以下幾部分：第一章是緒論部分；第二章介紹儒家“五倫”思想的提出、形成和發(fā)展；第三章介紹中國伊斯蘭“五典”思想形成的歷史背景及其重要內(nèi)容；第四章較為詳細(xì)的對比研究儒家“五倫”思想與中國伊斯蘭“五典”思想的異同性。
[Abstract]:In the traditional Chinese culture, the Confucian ethics and moral thought has deeply branded it and affected people's social morality and ethical life. At the same time, the ancient civilization, as a state of etiquette, was also accepted with her broad mind, absorbing and integrating the excellent elements of many foreign cultures. Among many foreign cultures, Chinese Islamic culture is one of the typical representatives. As a kind of foreign religious ideology, in order to survive and develop smoothly in China, it is necessary to collide and merge with Chinese native ideology. Some Chinese Muslim scholars in the Ming and Qing dynasties took advantage of their own dual cultural heritage of Islamic civilization and Chinese civilization. They translated the classics and philosophic works of Islam into Chinese with the Chinese language as their carrier. Then combined with Confucianism and on the basis of the author of the book, with practical action to open the history of "dialogue between Confucianism." The dialogue between Hui and Confucianism in history has promoted the process of the localization and localization of Islam, and further consolidated the adaptation of Muslim immigrant groups of Hui nationality to Chinese culture in the vast sea of Han culture. This paper begins with "human relations" and tries to find out the similarities and differences between them through the comparison between the Confucian "five Lun" thought and the Chinese Islamic "five Dian" thought. It is hoped that the relationship between religious belief and national identity can be used for reference. Based on historical data analysis and comparative study and guided by historical materialism, this article is divided into the following parts: the first chapter is the introduction part; The second chapter introduces the formation, formation and development of the Confucian thought of "five Lun", the third chapter introduces the historical background and important contents of the formation of the "five codes" of Islam in China. The fourth chapter makes a comparative study of the similarities and differences between the Confucian thought of "five Lun" and the thought of "five Classics" of Islam in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：B968

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 費孝通;簡述我的民族研究經(jīng)歷和思考[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1997年02期

2 朱小軍;;清初回族學(xué)者劉智“五典”說探微[J];重慶科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2008年09期

3 黃人杰;中國傳統(tǒng)人倫思想與五倫的道德觀[J];河北學(xué)刊;2005年02期

4 楊錚錚;;傳統(tǒng)“五倫”的現(xiàn)代建構(gòu)[J];湖南師范大學(xué)社會科學(xué)學(xué)報;2009年03期

5 宋瑞芝,唐云波,黎海波;上下協(xié)調(diào) 良性互動——“五倫”及其現(xiàn)代意義述評[J];韓山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2004年01期

6 敏文杰;;儒家“五倫”思想和劉智“五典”思想之比較[J];回族研究;2007年01期

7 金剛;“伊儒相通”對伊斯蘭教適應(yīng)中國社會的促進作用[J];中共濟南市委黨校濟南市行政學(xué)院濟南市社會主義學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

8 梁向明;“回之與儒,教異而理同”——兼談回族學(xué)者馬注的伊斯蘭教倫理道德觀[J];寧夏社會科學(xué);2005年02期

9 陳海紅,李長泰;儒家人倫思想的建構(gòu)與展開[J];人文雜志;2003年03期

10 梁韋弦;孟子“五倫”說考議[J];松遼學(xué)刊(社會科學(xué)版);1993年02期

，

本文編號：2057010