本文選題：共時性原型 + 歷時性原型��； 參考：《文藝?yán)碚撗芯俊?013年01期

【摘要】：中國上古神話與其它文明不同之處,在于它的破碎性,而這破碎是源于先秦諸侯對歷史文獻(xiàn)的集體燔毀,而不僅是秦始皇的"焚書坑儒"。這場沉默的"文革",導(dǎo)致了第一代中國神話的毀滅。而后,在亞洲大移民的背景中,印度、伊朗和西亞的神話片段,組成了以《山海經(jīng)》為代表的第二代神話。這個新神系的建構(gòu),主要基于歷時性的文化傳播,而非共時性的"集體無意識",它跟非洲智人向全球殖民的模式密切呼應(yīng)。但是,新神話的建構(gòu)遭到了軸心時代實(shí)用理性主義的阻攔。秦漢兩代的帝王和文人,試圖以祖先崇拜代替神yG崇拜,以歷史敘事代替神話敘事,由此導(dǎo)致第二代中國神話的湮滅。
[Abstract]:The difference between ancient Chinese mythology and other civilizations lies in its fragmentation, which originates from the collective burnt destruction of historical documents by the vassals of the Pre-Qin Dynasty, and not only by Qin Shihuang's "burning of books and Confucianism".This silent Cultural Revolution led to the destruction of the first generation of Chinese mythology.Then, in the background of Asian immigrants, the mythical fragments of India, Iran and Western Asia formed the second generation mythology represented by the Book of Mountains and Seas.The construction of this new deity system is mainly based on the diachronic cultural communication rather than the synchronic "collective unconscious", which closely echoes the African Homo sapiens' model of global colonization.However, the construction of the new myth was blocked by practical rationalism in the axis era.The emperors and literati of the Qin and Han dynasties tried to replace the worship of God YG with the worship of ancestors, and replaced the mythical narration with historical narration, which led to the annihilation of the second generation of Chinese mythology.
【作者單位】： 同濟(jì)大學(xué)人文學(xué)院中文系;
【分類號】：B932
，

本文編號：1737312