淺談薩迦派和格魯派對(duì)現(xiàn)量和已決智的不同論述
本文選題:量學(xué) 切入點(diǎn):現(xiàn)量 出處:《青海民族大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文 論文類型:學(xué)位論文
【摘要】:因明學(xué)在一千多年前傳入藏區(qū),經(jīng)過(guò)無(wú)數(shù)藏族學(xué)者的研習(xí)吸收、消化改造、提高發(fā)展,現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)成為藏學(xué)中最重要的組成部分之一縱觀藏傳佛教因明學(xué)的發(fā)展歷史,自11世紀(jì)桑普寺建立起,尤其是從恰巴論師創(chuàng)立了藏傳因明學(xué)獨(dú)特的學(xué)習(xí)方法——辯經(jīng),在藏地開(kāi)始出現(xiàn)了大量的因明學(xué)著作。由于恰巴論師對(duì)因明學(xué)的重視,以及他在桑普寺的威信,很快在藏地興起了“恰巴派”這一派別,也就是在后期被薩迦班智達(dá)等稱為的“早期因明學(xué)派”。在整個(gè)藏傳因明學(xué)的發(fā)展過(guò)程中影響很大。直到13世紀(jì),薩迦班智達(dá)著了藏傳因明史上最著名的著作《量理寶藏論》,薩迦班智達(dá)根據(jù)法稱的《釋量論》等因明學(xué)重要典籍對(duì)恰巴論師等早期的藏地因明派系的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了進(jìn)一步的提升。因此,這本著作對(duì)藏傳因明學(xué)的發(fā)展起到了很重要的作用。特別是薩迦班智達(dá)傳承和發(fā)揚(yáng)了法稱的《釋量論》,在融通陳那和法稱的因明思想的基礎(chǔ)上,總結(jié)因明七論主要內(nèi)容撰寫了《量理寶藏論》,從而形成了薩迦派自己的因明體系。之后到15世紀(jì),宗喀巴大師建立了甘丹寺,從此格魯派迅速崛起,宗喀巴師徒非常重視對(duì)因明學(xué)的學(xué)習(xí),通過(guò)對(duì)陳那和法稱的因明學(xué)典籍詳細(xì)的學(xué)習(xí),同時(shí)又借鑒了薩迦派的《量理寶藏論》,從而發(fā)展了格魯派自己獨(dú)到的因明學(xué)思想理論體系。以上這三個(gè)時(shí)期可以被認(rèn)為是藏傳因明史上大三非常重要的時(shí)期。因此,在這篇論文當(dāng)中本人將對(duì)薩迦派和格魯派在關(guān)于量學(xué)當(dāng)中現(xiàn)識(shí)和已決智的解釋和論述進(jìn)行比較,意在通過(guò)比較的方法,進(jìn)一步分析其各自對(duì)現(xiàn)量和已決智的不同觀點(diǎn)和論述方式,從而分析出其共同點(diǎn),并且適當(dāng)?shù)膶?duì)不同的觀點(diǎn)劃清界限。本論文總共分為三章,第一章里簡(jiǎn)要地介紹了薩迦派和格魯派的因明學(xué)的起源和特點(diǎn),以及薩迦因明形成之前的藏傳因明的講學(xué)情況做為鋪墊。第二章里主要比較和分析了薩迦派和格魯派在關(guān)于量的不同解釋和論述方式。第三章主要對(duì)薩迦派和格魯派在關(guān)于現(xiàn)量和已決智是否有共性進(jìn)行比較分析,總結(jié)性地列出其不同的特點(diǎn)及部分理論觀點(diǎn)上的特點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:In-Ming was introduced into Tibetan areas more than 1,000 years ago, absorbed by numerous Tibetan scholars, digested and reformed, and improved. Now it has become one of the most important components of Tibetan studies and has become one of the most important parts of Tibetan Buddhism. Since the establishment of the Sanpu Temple in the 11th century, especially from the Chiapa theorists, who founded the unique learning method of Tibetan Invincialism-the Dian Jing, there began to appear a large number of works on Inmics in Tibet, which was due to the importance attached by Chaba theorists to the study of imminence. And his prestige in the Temple of Samp, which soon rose in the Tibetan area, "the Chaba faction," That is, the "early InMing School", which was called the "early InMing School" by Sakya Banzhida and so on in the later period. It had a great influence on the development of the whole Tibetan Invincialism until the 13th century. Sakah Banzhida has written the most famous book in the history of Tibetan history, "the Theory of quantitative Treasures". Sakah Banzhida, according to what he called "the Theory of interpretation and quantity", has carried out the views of the early Yiming faction of Tibet, such as the Chiba theorists, and so on. Further ascension. Therefore, This work has played a very important role in the development of Tibetan imminence. In particular, Sakya Banzhida inherited and carried forward what he called the "interpretation of quantity", which was based on the integration of Chen Na's and Dharma's InMing thoughts. Summing up the main contents of the seventh theory of Yiming, he wrote "the Theory of quantitative Treasures", thus forming the InMing system of the Sakya School. Later, in the 15th century, Master Zongkaba established the Gandan Temple, and since then the Gruff faction rose rapidly. Zongkaba teachers and disciples attach great importance to the study of InMing, through the detailed study of Chen Na's and the Dharma's classic books of InMing study. At the same time, it draws lessons from Sakya's Theory of Treasures of Metrology, thus developing the unique theoretical system of Ingenialism of the Gru School. These three periods can be considered as the most important period in the history of Tibetan immortality. Therefore, the three periods can be regarded as the most important period in the history of Tibetan immortality. In this paper, I will compare the explanations and expositions of the Sakya School and the Gru School on the present and determined wisdom in quantitative science, with a view to comparing them with the method of comparison. This thesis is divided into three chapters: further analysis of their different viewpoints and approaches to present quantity and determined wisdom, and analysis of their common points, and proper demarcation of different viewpoints. The first chapter briefly introduces the origin and characteristics of the InMing School of Sakya and Gruglism. The second chapter mainly compares and analyzes the different interpretation and argumentation of the quantity between the Sakya and the Gruki. Chapter three mainly focuses on the Sakya and GE. Lu's comparative analysis on whether there are commonalities between the present quantity and the determined wisdom, A summary of its different characteristics and some of the theoretical point of view of the characteristics.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:青海民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:B948
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 郜林濤;元代薩迦派在五臺(tái)山的傳播[J];文物世界;2001年01期
2 張敦安;試述薩迦派[J];西藏民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1981年01期
3 上官劍壁;略論喇嘛教薩迦派的歷史地位[J];青海民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1980年01期
4 沈海波;略論因明學(xué)史學(xué)上的若干問(wèn)題[J];世界宗教研究;2004年03期
5 張曉翔;;首屆國(guó)際因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)概述[J];世界宗教研究;2006年03期
6 張忠義;;搶救絕學(xué) 發(fā)揚(yáng)光大——首屆國(guó)際因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)綜述[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2006年09期
7 ;中國(guó)第三屆因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)在西寧召開(kāi)[J];內(nèi)蒙古師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期
8 張忠義;劉純;;因明風(fēng)采 再現(xiàn)絲綢之路——中國(guó)第四屆因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)綜述[J];哲學(xué)動(dòng)態(tài);2009年03期
9 思齊;;第六屆全國(guó)因明學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)在洛陽(yáng)召開(kāi)[J];中州學(xué)刊;2010年03期
10 ;第六屆全國(guó)因明學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;2010年06期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條
1 劉培育;;因明三十四年[A];因明新探——首屆因明學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];1983年
2 波米·強(qiáng)巴洛卓;楊化群;宋曉嵇;;藏傳因明的作用和基本內(nèi)容——入因明學(xué)階梯[A];因明研究[C];1990年
3 劉邦凡;唐歆;宋茜;;簡(jiǎn)論近代以來(lái)的我國(guó)因明教學(xué)[A];第一次南開(kāi)邏輯學(xué)專業(yè)學(xué)人學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2012年
4 沈劍英;;因明學(xué)簡(jiǎn)論[A];全國(guó)邏輯討論會(huì)論文選集[C];1979年
5 周文英;;因明在印度的發(fā)生和發(fā)展[A];因明論文集[C];1980年
6 沈劍英;;因明學(xué)簡(jiǎn)論[A];因明論文集[C];1980年
7 沈劍英;;略論因明的宗[A];因明論文集[C];1980年
8 石村;;因明二問(wèn)[A];因明論文集[C];1980年
9 周文英;;隋唐時(shí)期因明的輸入[A];因明論文集[C];1980年
10 呂o,
本文編號(hào):1650029
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zjlw/1650029.html