本文關(guān)鍵詞： 薩班 三律儀差別論 研究 影響　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2011年博士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：薩迦班智達(dá)是藏族歷史、文化乃至藏傳佛教歷史上一位重要人物。在其大量佛學(xué)著作中,《三律儀差別論》在藏傳佛教史上具有深遠(yuǎn)影響和重要地位。在此論著中薩班系統(tǒng)闡述了自己關(guān)于別解脫戒、菩薩戒、密乘戒三律儀及其實(shí)踐的戒律思想,全面總結(jié)后弘期以來(lái)藏地佛教中的各種觀(guān)點(diǎn),判定、駁斥噶舉、寧瑪、噶當(dāng)派等教派的各種佛學(xué)觀(guān)點(diǎn)、修習(xí)實(shí)踐的是非曲直。因此自本論著問(wèn)世以來(lái)倍受關(guān)注,褒貶不一,紛爭(zhēng)不休,是藏傳佛教史上最具影響的論著之一 近現(xiàn)代以來(lái)國(guó)內(nèi)學(xué)術(shù)界對(duì)薩迦班智達(dá)的研究取得了舉世矚目的成就。但是,目前學(xué)界的研究主要集中在薩班的生平事跡、政治貢獻(xiàn)、《薩迦格言》、因明學(xué)等方面,對(duì)《三律儀差別論》的研究尚很有限,涉及該論著的大部分成果也只是零星的引用或翻譯,缺乏系統(tǒng)、全面的研究。 針對(duì)這一問(wèn)題,筆者首次對(duì)《三律儀差別論》進(jìn)行專(zhuān)題研究。首先在完整翻譯《三律儀差別論》全文內(nèi)容的前提下,呈現(xiàn)、詮釋此書(shū)各章節(jié)的基本概念、主要內(nèi)容和邏輯結(jié)構(gòu)、思想特點(diǎn)。其次,以此為基礎(chǔ),分析、考察此論著寫(xiě)作的背景目的,評(píng)價(jià)、考量其在藏傳佛教史上的地位與影響。 本研究的內(nèi)容分為兩部分,上篇文本解讀與詮釋,下篇文本翻譯與注釋。上篇中,首先論述了薩迦班智達(dá)的生平、修學(xué)、建樹(shù)以及《三律儀差別論》的結(jié)構(gòu)、寫(xiě)作背景與目的。其次,闡述文本內(nèi)容主要?jiǎng)e解脫戒、菩薩戒、密乘戒的修持,厘清三律儀的相互關(guān)系,對(duì)薩班在此論著中所批判的對(duì)象與內(nèi)容做追蹤、考辯,對(duì)薩班戒律思想進(jìn)行理論分析。最后,探究《三律儀差別論》的特點(diǎn),對(duì)其在藏傳佛教史上的地位與影響做成整體、客觀(guān)的評(píng)價(jià)與分析。下篇翻譯《三律儀差別論》,解釋此論中出現(xiàn)的佛學(xué)名相,對(duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題進(jìn)行考辯。 本論文的創(chuàng)新之處有以下幾個(gè)方面： 1,本論文首次專(zhuān)門(mén)針對(duì)《三律儀差別論》這本集中體現(xiàn)薩班佛學(xué)思想的論著進(jìn)行全面、系統(tǒng)的研究,闡明其戒律修持觀(guān)與佛學(xué)思想特點(diǎn)。 2,本論文通過(guò)對(duì)薩班《三律儀差別論》的研究以及對(duì)相關(guān)史實(shí)的考證,提出該論著在藏傳佛教思想史上具有重要意義。它為了解和研究后弘期至12—13世紀(jì)的藏傳佛教戒律修持情況,提供了較為的豐富的歷史資料。 3,本論文將薩班寫(xiě)作《三律儀差別論》的原因與背景置于藏傳佛教本土化的大背景之下進(jìn)行分析與考量,提出此論著中薩班所批判、駁斥的各種見(jiàn)、修、行反映了藏傳佛教后弘初期,印度佛教在藏地經(jīng)過(guò)本土化、民族化進(jìn)程中逐漸擺脫對(duì)印度佛教的依傍,走上獨(dú)立發(fā)展的道路；藏地的高僧大德開(kāi)始根據(jù)自己的理解與體驗(yàn)闡發(fā)佛教義理,孤明先發(fā)開(kāi)啟了一代思想的新風(fēng),藏傳佛教思想界出現(xiàn)了百家爭(zhēng)鳴、百花齊放的狀況。薩班著此論的目的是對(duì)上述各種思想作總結(jié)性梳理與批判,正本清源,使其回歸正統(tǒng)。 4,本論文首次將薩班的《三律儀差別論》由藏譯漢,并加以注釋與詮釋。此譯本是國(guó)內(nèi)首本《三律儀差別論》的漢文全譯本,可為學(xué)界了解和研究薩班律學(xué)思想提供方便。
[Abstract]:This paper deals with the various views , decisions , refutation of Buddhist ideas and practice in Tibetan Buddhism history , which is one of the most influential arguments in the history of Tibetan Buddhism . In recent times , domestic academic circles have made remarkable achievements in the research of Zachanda Zhida . However , the present study mainly focuses on the life - level and political contribution of sabot , the political contribution , the discussion about the differences of the three - law instrument , and the lack of systematic and comprehensive research on the most of the achievements of this thesis . Aiming at this problem , the author makes a special study on the difference theory of the three - law instrument . Firstly , this paper presents the basic concept , main contents and logical structure and ideological characteristics of each chapter of this book under the precondition of the full text of the difference theory of the whole translation theories . Secondly , this paper analyses and investigates the background purpose and the evaluation of the author ' s writing , and considers its position and influence in the history of Tibetan Buddhism . The contents of this study are divided into two parts : the interpretation and interpretation of the text , the translation and annotation of the next text . The innovation of this paper has the following aspects : 1 . For the first time , this thesis is devoted to the discussion of the difference theory of the three - law instrument . This article focuses on the comprehensive and systematic study of the concept of sambang ' s Buddhism , and expounds the characteristics of the concept of martial law and the thought of Buddhism . 2 . Based on the study of the difference theory of Sanbanyan and the textual research of relevant historical facts , this paper puts forward that the thesis has great significance in the history of Tibetan Buddhism thought . It provides more abundant historical data for the understanding and research of Tibetan Buddhism withdrawal in the 12th - 13th century . 3 . This thesis analyzes and considers the reason and background of the difference between the three rules of the writing of Sabin and the background in the localization of Tibetan Buddhism . The author puts forward the criticism and refutation of Sanban in the early stage of Tibetan Buddhism . The Buddhist doctrine of Buddhism in Tibet has been gradually removed from the process of nationalization and nationalization . 4 . It is the first time in this thesis to study the differences between the three rules of Sarban and annotation and interpretation . The translation is a translation of the Chinese version of the difference theory of the first three - law instrument in the country , which can provide convenience to the academic field to understand and study the thought of sabbatics .

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：B948

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 班班多杰;;禪宗在藏傳佛教前弘期的傳播和對(duì)后弘期的影響[J];歷史研究;2008年06期

2 張煒明;陳兵;;薩班對(duì)十二、十三世紀(jì)藏傳佛教的批判——《三律儀辨別論》評(píng)述[J];西南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社科版);2010年10期

3 巴臥·祖拉陳哇 ,黃顥;《賢者喜宴》(■)譯注(十八)[J];西藏民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1985年04期

4 才讓;從《五部遺教》看禪宗在吐蕃的傳播和影響[J];西藏研究;2002年01期

5 才讓;略述薩班在涼州等地的弘法事跡[J];西藏研究;2004年04期

6 尹邦志;;薩班對(duì)摩訶衍遺教的批判[J];宗教學(xué)研究;2007年03期

7 班班多杰;;論藏傳佛教薩迦派“輪回涅i夢(mèng)薇稹敝苧枷隱J];哲學(xué)研究;2007年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：1487893