本文關(guān)鍵詞：綜合創(chuàng)新：中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型的歷史進(jìn)路和演進(jìn)趨向，，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

綜合創(chuàng)新：中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型的歷史進(jìn)路和演進(jìn)趨向

綜合創(chuàng)新：中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型的歷史進(jìn)路和演進(jìn)趨向

百余年來,關(guān)于“中國(guó)往何處去”的不足,一直是時(shí)代的中心不足。對(duì)這一不足的探討不同領(lǐng)域的專家學(xué)者都進(jìn)行了深入的探討,在文化哲學(xué)方面大致上可以分為三派：現(xiàn)當(dāng)代新儒家文化哲學(xué)家們更偏重于文化的抽象價(jià)值,即認(rèn)為儒家的道德主體意識(shí)可以超越時(shí)空,超越不同的社會(huì)文化背景來解決人的不足,存在的不足,生命的不足,生活意 義的不足以及人類產(chǎn)生的種種疏離和困惑的諸多不足,給人以安身立命的根據(jù)�！八麄兪菑某橄蟮乃枷胗^念出發(fā),最終退縮于宗教性的終極關(guān)懷,執(zhí)迷于道統(tǒng)的研究,因而不是縮短而是夸大了儒家的思想中理想和現(xiàn)實(shí)的距離,使儒家的文化價(jià)值流于空疏,浮泛之中�！雹倥c之相反,西化派文化哲學(xué)家們則堅(jiān)持對(duì)文化典籍的價(jià)值持“評(píng)判的態(tài)度”,否定其歷史價(jià)值而進(jìn)一步否定其現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值,因此,他們從“傳統(tǒng)文化不適應(yīng)現(xiàn)代生活”的理論,反過來又片面夸大傳統(tǒng)文化那些體現(xiàn)其封建時(shí)代特點(diǎn)的內(nèi)容和它的負(fù)面效應(yīng),而沒有看到傳統(tǒng)文化中也含有超越其時(shí)代之普遍性因素。而馬克思文化哲學(xué)家們極力在扭轉(zhuǎn)“左”的傾向和消解“左”的影響之后,堅(jiān)持文化價(jià)值的有無統(tǒng)一觀。他們認(rèn)識(shí)到任何文化價(jià)值都是抽象價(jià)值與具體價(jià)值的統(tǒng)一,抽象文化價(jià)值處于具體文化價(jià)值之中。唯物史觀的綜合創(chuàng)新即是這樣�！八麄儾皇菑挠^念的文本出發(fā)來理解并解釋人的實(shí)踐,而是從歷史動(dòng)力系統(tǒng)去觀察文化的自主性和文化價(jià)值如何從“無”到“有”,如何將潛存的,無限的抽象文化價(jià)值和具體的歷史文化價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)化為現(xiàn)實(shí)價(jià)值,拓展對(duì)于原典,本文的解釋和釋義空間�！雹谶@便是創(chuàng)造性轉(zhuǎn)換,也是唯物史觀綜合創(chuàng)新文化哲學(xué)家們研究的核心。因此,“綜合創(chuàng)新”的文化觀是客觀的,它克服了現(xiàn)當(dāng)代新儒學(xué)文化哲學(xué)和西化派文化哲學(xué)中夾雜的情緒化,玄虛化弊端。從這種文化價(jià)值觀出發(fā),文化哲學(xué)家們認(rèn)定未來的中國(guó)文化將是中國(guó)與世界的,傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代化的,科學(xué)與人文的有機(jī)結(jié)合或統(tǒng)一。這三個(gè)派別都始于五四新文化運(yùn)動(dòng),在經(jīng)過了一個(gè)世紀(jì)的辯詰和博弈,他們?cè)诔街形�、古今之�?zhēng),打通體用、形上之辯方面基本上形成了共識(shí),但在中國(guó)未來的指導(dǎo)思想,文化的主體性等方面還存在著重大分歧,這些不足不解決,建設(shè)社會(huì)主義先進(jìn)文化必將成為一句空話。衣俊卿曾說過：“文化哲學(xué)在21世紀(jì)將成為最有影響的哲學(xué)范式或哲學(xué)形態(tài),要推動(dòng)中國(guó)的文化哲學(xué)研究走向深化,就應(yīng)當(dāng)在建構(gòu)中國(guó)現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的主導(dǎo)性文化思想和轉(zhuǎn)換文化哲學(xué)研究范式兩個(gè)方面下工夫”①本文主要分為三章：第一章是緒論,首先講述不足的提出,筆者主要是在美國(guó)的政治學(xué)家亨廷頓的文明沖突論中引發(fā)了想要研究文化的沖動(dòng),事實(shí)證明,中國(guó)處于現(xiàn)代化的轉(zhuǎn)型這樣一個(gè)特殊時(shí)期,應(yīng)如何應(yīng)對(duì)中外與古今的文化矛盾,是我們無法逃避的重要不足。經(jīng)過百余年的探索,最終發(fā)現(xiàn)走中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義文化發(fā)展道路是最適合中國(guó)國(guó)情的,只有綜合創(chuàng)新的文化哲學(xué)思想才是中國(guó)的明智之選。第二章是在現(xiàn)代化背景下,在各種西方社會(huì)思潮影響下,中國(guó)如何應(yīng)對(duì)現(xiàn)代化,再通過中國(guó)現(xiàn)代化的兩次轉(zhuǎn)型,從中吸取教訓(xùn),從外部環(huán)境和歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)層面來看中國(guó)文化現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型。最后一章主要是論述中國(guó)文化創(chuàng)新之路的探索和如何運(yùn)用馬克思唯物史觀的策略和文化哲學(xué)的視角實(shí)現(xiàn)中國(guó)文化的綜合創(chuàng)新之路及綜合創(chuàng)新的界定,基礎(chǔ),原則,方向,綜合創(chuàng)新的策略在實(shí)踐中如何應(yīng)用。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于嘗試在現(xiàn)代化背景下,運(yùn)用文化哲學(xué)的視角和馬克思唯物史觀的策略來淺析淺析中國(guó)未來的主導(dǎo)性文化精神以及中國(guó)文化轉(zhuǎn)型應(yīng)有哪些實(shí)踐策略。除哲學(xué)視角外,本文還運(yùn)用歷史學(xué),社會(huì)學(xué)等不同的淺析淺析視角。就研究策略講,本文主要以矛盾淺析淺析法和系統(tǒng)淺析淺析法為主,同時(shí)借鑒其他社會(huì)科學(xué)和自然科學(xué)的研究策略,如比較法、案例法、實(shí)證法等。

【Abstract】 For more than 100 years, question concerning" China is gone toward where to go", always question in the centre of that time generation. All carried on a thorough study to the expert scholars of study different realm of this question, on the whole can is divided into three appointments in cultural philosophy:Contemporary new Confucianism cultural philosophers are over-emphasized to more now cultural abstract worth, then think that morals master consciousness of Confucianism can outstrip time and space and outstrip different social cultural back ground to work out the person’s problem, existent problem, life of problem, live meaning of problem and what mankind generated Be various to is estranged with confused many problem, give person with settle down of basis. "They thought idea to set out from the abstract, ultimate end care finally Be shrunken back to a religion, stick to the search of orthodoxy of teachings, as a result exaggerated instead of shortening the thought of Confucianism is apart from and makes the cultural worth of Confucianism become not profound amid the ideal and real and float to be suffused with in."With of reversal, westernize appointment cultural philosophers to then insist vs. the worth of cultural ancient works hold" the attitude for adjudicating", negate its history worth and negate its reality worth further, therefore, they are from the theory of "the traditional cultural maladjustment modern lives" and turn over again unilateral exaggerative traditional cultural is also those contents sc and its negative effects that embody its feudal age character, and didn’t see to contain the universalities factors that outstrip its age in traditional culture.But mark think cultural philosophers to make every effort“l(fā)eft”in the torsion of incline to and insist that having of cultural worth have no unified view after eliminating "left" impact of solution. Their knowing each other to any cultural worth is all unity of abstract worth and concrete worth, the abstract cultural worth is placed in concrete cultural worth in. Only the synthesis of thing history view is creative is so. "They anti from idea of the text set out to comprehend and explain the person’s fulfillment, but observe cultural independence and culture to be worth of from the history power driven system how from" have no" to "have", how the Ian save of, unlimited and abstract cultural worth and concrete history culture is worth of a conversion being worth of for reality and expands for the original Dian, textual interpretation with release righteousness space." This would is to created sex convert, is also thing history view to only synthesize the nucleus of creative cultural philosophers search. Therefore, the cultural view of "synthesis innovation" is objective, it overcame the emotion that the contemporary new scholar learns cultural philosophy and westernization to send to mix up in cultural philosophy now to turn, and the Juan falsely turned irregularity. Set out from this cultural value, cultural philosophers affirm that future Chinese culture will be China and world of, tradition and modernization of, the organic wedge bonding or unity of science and humanities.These three groups all begin from 54 new culture running, at after arguing of a century Jive and game, they at outstrip amid w., thou now it contend for, break through a body to use, shape up it argued aspect to basically forming a consensus, but guided thought in Chinese prospective, cultural master etc. still existence emphasize big rift, these questions don’t understand definitely, constructing socialism advanced culture will definitely become an empty talk. The dress handsome Qing once said:”Cultural philosophy will become philosophy of having the impact in 21st century Fan Shi or philosophy appearance push most the cultural philosophy search alignment of China deepen, should contrive in the aspects of constructing or purchasing a modern social Chinese predominance cultural spirit and convert cultural philosophy studying Fan Shi Liang."This article mainly divides into three chapters:The first chapter is the introduction, first narrated that question statement, the author was mainly discusses in US’s political scientist Huntington’s civilized conflict initiates the wish research culture impulsion, the fact had proven, China was in modernized reforming this kind of special time, how should deal with the Chinese and foreign and the ancient and modern culture is contradictory, is important question which we were unable to evade. After hundred remaining years of life’s explorations, discovered finally the Chinese characteristic socialism culture development path is most suits the Chinese national condition, only then the synthesis innovation’s culture philosophic thinking is China’s unwise electing.The second chapter is under the modernized background, under each kind of Western society ideological trend influence, how China to deal with the modernization, again through Chinese modernization’s two reforming, the learn lesson, settles on country culture modernization reforming from the external environment and the historic experience stratification plane. The last chapter is mainly the quest that discusses the road of Chinese cultural innovation and how make use of mark to think only the road of the synthesis innovation of the method of the thing history view and visual angle realize Chinese culture of cultural philosophy and comprehensive creative definition, foundation, principle, direction, comprehensive the creative method is in the fulfillment how apply.This article place of innovation lies in the attempt under the modernized background, which will analyze the Chinese future leading cultural spirit as well as Chinese culture reforming using the cultural philosophy’s angle of view and the Marx historical materialism’s method, should have to practice the method. Besides philosophy angle of view, this article also using history, sociology and so on different analysis angle of view. Says on the research technique, this article mainly by the contradictory analytic method and the system analytic method primarily, simultaneously profits from other social sciences and the natural sciences research technique, like comparison test, case law, real diagnosis law and so on.

【關(guān)鍵詞】 文化； 現(xiàn)代化； 文化轉(zhuǎn)型； 綜合創(chuàng)新；
【Key words】 culture； modernization； cultural transformation； synthesize innovation；

更多論文推薦: 各專業(yè)論文 海量論文下載

上一篇文章： 文化整合視野下的政治溝通

下一篇文章： 上海浦東新區(qū)政府管理體制探討

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：綜合創(chuàng)新：中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化現(xiàn)代化轉(zhuǎn)型的歷史進(jìn)路和演進(jìn)趨向，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

本文編號(hào)：133145