發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-07-16 21:36

【摘要】：意志自由觀念經(jīng)常受到質(zhì)疑,主張有意志自由的哲學(xué)理論被稱(chēng)為"意志自由論",意志自由論有古典和當(dāng)代兩種形式�？档率枪诺湟庵咀杂衫碚摰拇�,他主張,在本體界,人是自由的并且擁有自由意志,然而在現(xiàn)象界,人則不是自由的,受制于因果規(guī)律。法蘭克福是當(dāng)代意志自由理論的代表,他認(rèn)為,意志自由存在于人的一階意志與二階意志的一致之中。但是當(dāng)我們用自由的三種含義(道德自由、政治自由和本體論自由)對(duì)意志自由理論加以檢驗(yàn)之后,我們發(fā)現(xiàn),無(wú)論是康德式的古典意志自由理論還是法蘭克福式的當(dāng)代意志自由理論,都存在一些難以克服的困難。
[Abstract]:The concept of freedom of will is often questioned. The philosophical theory of freedom of will is called "freedom of will theory". There are two forms of freedom of will theory: classical and contemporary. Kant is the representative of the classical theory of freedom of will. He holds that in the ontology, man is free and has free will, but in the field of phenomena, man is not free and is restricted by the law of cause and effect. Frankfurt is the representative of the contemporary theory of freedom of will. He believes that freedom of will exists in the consistency between the first-order will and the second-order will. However, when we test the theory of freedom of will with the three meanings of freedom (moral freedom, political freedom and ontological freedom), we find that there are some insurmountable difficulties in both Kant's classical freedom of will theory and Frankfurt's contemporary freedom of will theory.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)哲學(xué)社會(huì)學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)重點(diǎn)研究基地重大項(xiàng)目(16JJD720008) 國(guó)家2011計(jì)劃司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心研究成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D081

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 謝林 ,曾曉平;自然權(quán)利新演繹[J];世界哲學(xué);2004年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 余國(guó)志;論意志自由與現(xiàn)實(shí)自由之張力[D];云南師范大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2515271