政治動員的表現(xiàn)邏輯
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-20 09:39
【摘要】： 政治動員是政治發(fā)展的重要手段之一,近年來學者在研究政治動員僅局限在特定時空的研究范圍之內,并沒有對此作一般性的理論探索。對此,筆者沿著政治動員所需內在條件為線索,從一般理論的層面上,沿著其內在的邏輯,對政治動員表現(xiàn)出的現(xiàn)象進行一定的研究,進而從其內在邏輯上得到一定的啟示。 政治動員其理論上的條件最早可追溯到古希臘柏拉圖的理念論,隨后經馬基雅維利、盧梭、康德等人的發(fā)展,最終完善于卡爾馬克思的政治學說。沿著政治動員所需條件:動員主體較高的認知水平、動員主體的強勢地位和動員過程中方法手段的有效性這三個內在條件,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)政治動員在邏輯上通常表現(xiàn)在三個方面,即精英政治、威權體制和過程中的平等觀念,進而理清了政治動員的一般邏輯表現(xiàn)。 從政治動員的內在邏輯來看,其動員總是在一定的理性的框架內進行,但在現(xiàn)實中又往往難以定量,這使得其在實踐中往往表現(xiàn)出一定的有效性和負面效應。因此,政治動員作為政治發(fā)展的手段并非萬能,其只是政治發(fā)展的一種可選擇的手段,只有在特定的時空背景下才能更好的發(fā)揮作用。
[Abstract]:Political mobilization is one of the important means of political development. In recent years, scholars have not made a general theoretical exploration in studying political mobilization only within the scope of a specific time and space. In this regard, the author follows the internal conditions of political mobilization as a clue, from the general theory level, along with its internal logic, political mobilization shows a certain study of the phenomenon, and then from its internal logic to get some inspiration. The theoretical conditions of political mobilization can be traced back to Plato's theory of philosophy in ancient Greece. After the development of Machiavelli, Rousseau, Kant and so on, the political theory of Karl Marx was finally perfected. Along with the three internal conditions of political mobilization: the higher cognitive level of the mobilization subject, the strong position of the mobilization subject and the effectiveness of the method and means in the mobilization process, it can be found that the political mobilization is usually manifested in three aspects logically. The idea of equality in elite politics, authoritarian system and process clarifies the general logic of political mobilization. From the internal logic of political mobilization, its mobilization is always carried out within a certain rational framework, but it is often difficult to quantify in reality, which makes it often show certain effectiveness and negative effect in practice. Therefore, political mobilization as a means of political development is not omnipotent, it is only an optional means of political development, only in a specific time and space background can play a better role.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D0
本文編號：2344558
[Abstract]:Political mobilization is one of the important means of political development. In recent years, scholars have not made a general theoretical exploration in studying political mobilization only within the scope of a specific time and space. In this regard, the author follows the internal conditions of political mobilization as a clue, from the general theory level, along with its internal logic, political mobilization shows a certain study of the phenomenon, and then from its internal logic to get some inspiration. The theoretical conditions of political mobilization can be traced back to Plato's theory of philosophy in ancient Greece. After the development of Machiavelli, Rousseau, Kant and so on, the political theory of Karl Marx was finally perfected. Along with the three internal conditions of political mobilization: the higher cognitive level of the mobilization subject, the strong position of the mobilization subject and the effectiveness of the method and means in the mobilization process, it can be found that the political mobilization is usually manifested in three aspects logically. The idea of equality in elite politics, authoritarian system and process clarifies the general logic of political mobilization. From the internal logic of political mobilization, its mobilization is always carried out within a certain rational framework, but it is often difficult to quantify in reality, which makes it often show certain effectiveness and negative effect in practice. Therefore, political mobilization as a means of political development is not omnipotent, it is only an optional means of political development, only in a specific time and space background can play a better role.
【學位授予單位】：河北大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D0
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 何新華;機運與局限:發(fā)展型威權政體的政治合法性[J];東南亞研究;2005年02期
2 占美柏;威權政治下的憲法權威——二戰(zhàn)后東亞國家的政治體制轉型[J];東南亞研究;2005年03期
3 于建嶸;;共治威權與法治威權——中國政治發(fā)展的問題和出路[J];當代世界社會主義問題;2008年04期
4 劉瑛瑛;;“從平等到自由”的關聯(lián)與阻斷——盧梭平等思想的理路及其評價[J];華東政法大學學報;2007年04期
5 李征;簡論“政治動員”[J];河海大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2004年02期
6 馮秀文;世界政治史研究中的威權主義及其歷史定位——以拉丁美洲為例[J];世界歷史;2005年02期
7 張敏卿;中國共產黨民眾動員戰(zhàn)略口號三次變化的歷史特點及經驗[J];江漢論壇;2005年07期
8 孔繁斌;;政治動員的行動邏輯——一個概念模型及其應用[J];江蘇行政學院學報;2006年05期
9 魏泉琪;綠苑標語小議[J];綠化與生活;1999年03期
10 高永久;柳建文;;民族政治精英論[J];南開學報(哲學社會科學版);2008年05期
相關博士學位論文 前1條
1 吳開松;當代中國危機動員研究[D];華中師范大學;2006年
相關碩士學位論文 前2條
1 黃兢;建國初期中國共產黨的政治動員研究[D];華南師范大學;2003年
2 王興東;土地革命時期中共政治動員概述[D];吉林大學;2008年
，本文編號：2344558
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2344558.html
