丁文江與胡適的政治思想比較研究
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-16 08:07
【摘要】：胡適和丁文江二人是近代中國(guó)歷史上知名的學(xué)者，丁文江是中國(guó)最早的地質(zhì)教學(xué)機(jī)構(gòu)和地質(zhì)研究機(jī)構(gòu)的創(chuàng)建者，是中國(guó)近代地質(zhì)學(xué)界的開山人物，胡適則是新文化運(yùn)動(dòng)的領(lǐng)袖。丁、胡二人雖不是政治家，但都一生關(guān)心政治，議論政治，丁文江并有投身政治的實(shí)踐活動(dòng)。二人有共同的自由主義思想基礎(chǔ)，但在具體的政治問題上，卻有同有異，，反應(yīng)出中國(guó)自由主義的多樣面相，對(duì)二人思想做比較的研究，一方面可以加深對(duì)丁文江、胡適思想的認(rèn)識(shí)，同時(shí)更有助于我們加深對(duì)1920年代和1930年代的中國(guó)自由主義的認(rèn)識(shí)。 全文第一部分是引言，概括介紹丁文江與胡適二人的思想背景、思想交往。介紹與文章論題的研究意義、研究現(xiàn)狀及研究方法。 第一章圍繞“好人政府”問題，介紹丁文江與胡適展開的討論及實(shí)踐。1922年二人創(chuàng)辦的《努力》周報(bào)，議論時(shí)政，他們共同關(guān)注的問題就是改造中國(guó)走什么道路的問題，圍繞好人政府，《努力》周報(bào)進(jìn)行了討論，丁、胡二人對(duì)“好人”當(dāng)政模式下的政府性質(zhì)、政府組織原則、好政府黨的建立與否等問題上進(jìn)行了討論，丁文江并以出任“淞滬督辦”總辦做了一個(gè)好人從政的嘗試。 第二章主要討論丁文江與胡適在日本侵華后，對(duì)國(guó)共內(nèi)戰(zhàn)與抗日問題的討論。在日本侵華的大背景下，他們都堅(jiān)決反對(duì)國(guó)民黨進(jìn)行反共內(nèi)戰(zhàn)，但是對(duì)待日本的態(tài)度，卻存在一個(gè)由低調(diào)妥協(xié)到積極抗戰(zhàn)的變化過程。 第三章主要討論在1930年代著名的“民主與獨(dú)裁大討論”中，丁文江和胡適的觀點(diǎn)，討論胡適提倡“幼稚民主論”，丁文江主張的威權(quán)主義的“新式獨(dú)裁”的區(qū)別。 第四章是在前三部分的基礎(chǔ)之上，嘗試解析丁文江與胡適在政治思想上存在這些同異的原因。 全文的最后一部分是結(jié)語(yǔ)。對(duì)全文的觀點(diǎn)做一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:Hu Shi and Ding Wenjiang are two famous scholars in modern Chinese history. Ding Wenjiang is the founder of the earliest geological teaching institution and geological research institution in China. Ding and Hu are not politicians, but they care about politics and discuss politics all their lives. The two men share the same ideological basis for liberalism, but on specific political issues, there are similarities and differences, reflecting the diverse aspects of Chinese liberalism. A comparative study of the two people's thoughts can, on the one hand, deepen Ding Wenjiang. Hu Shi's understanding of Chinese liberalism in 1920s and 1930s is also helpful for us to deepen our understanding of Chinese liberalism in 1920s and 1930s. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the ideological background and communication between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi. This paper introduces the research significance, research status and research methods of the thesis. The first chapter focuses on the issue of "good government" and introduces the discussion and practice between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi. In 1922, the "hard work" weekly newspaper was founded by the two men to discuss the current politics. Their common concern was the question of what path to take in reforming China. The "hard work" Weekly newspaper was discussed around the good people's government. Ding and Hu discussed the nature of the government under the "good man" model, the principles of government organization, the establishment of the good government party, and so on. Ding Wenjiang also made a good attempt to take part in politics by acting as head office of "Songhu Supervision Office". The second chapter mainly discusses the civil war and anti-Japanese issues between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi after the Japanese invasion of China. Against the backdrop of Japanese aggression against China, they were firmly opposed to the KMT's anti-Communist civil war, but there was a process of change from low-key compromise to active resistance to Japan. The third chapter mainly discusses the views of Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi in the famous Great discussion on Democracy and dictatorship in the 1930s, and discusses the difference between "childish democracy" advocated by Hu Shi and "new autocracy" advocated by Ding Wenjiang. The fourth chapter is based on the first three parts, trying to analyze the reasons for the similarities and differences between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi in political thought. The last part of the paper is the conclusion. Make a simple summary of the views of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D092
本文編號(hào)：2334952
[Abstract]:Hu Shi and Ding Wenjiang are two famous scholars in modern Chinese history. Ding Wenjiang is the founder of the earliest geological teaching institution and geological research institution in China. Ding and Hu are not politicians, but they care about politics and discuss politics all their lives. The two men share the same ideological basis for liberalism, but on specific political issues, there are similarities and differences, reflecting the diverse aspects of Chinese liberalism. A comparative study of the two people's thoughts can, on the one hand, deepen Ding Wenjiang. Hu Shi's understanding of Chinese liberalism in 1920s and 1930s is also helpful for us to deepen our understanding of Chinese liberalism in 1920s and 1930s. The first part is the introduction, which introduces the ideological background and communication between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi. This paper introduces the research significance, research status and research methods of the thesis. The first chapter focuses on the issue of "good government" and introduces the discussion and practice between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi. In 1922, the "hard work" weekly newspaper was founded by the two men to discuss the current politics. Their common concern was the question of what path to take in reforming China. The "hard work" Weekly newspaper was discussed around the good people's government. Ding and Hu discussed the nature of the government under the "good man" model, the principles of government organization, the establishment of the good government party, and so on. Ding Wenjiang also made a good attempt to take part in politics by acting as head office of "Songhu Supervision Office". The second chapter mainly discusses the civil war and anti-Japanese issues between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi after the Japanese invasion of China. Against the backdrop of Japanese aggression against China, they were firmly opposed to the KMT's anti-Communist civil war, but there was a process of change from low-key compromise to active resistance to Japan. The third chapter mainly discusses the views of Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi in the famous Great discussion on Democracy and dictatorship in the 1930s, and discusses the difference between "childish democracy" advocated by Hu Shi and "new autocracy" advocated by Ding Wenjiang. The fourth chapter is based on the first three parts, trying to analyze the reasons for the similarities and differences between Ding Wenjiang and Hu Shi in political thought. The last part of the paper is the conclusion. Make a simple summary of the views of the full text.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D092
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張偉國(guó);;胡適和科學(xué)玄學(xué)之爭(zhēng)[J];安徽史學(xué);1991年04期
2 歐陽(yáng)哲生;;丁文江政治思想述論[J];安徽史學(xué);2008年06期
3 周亞孟;;從《努力周報(bào)》看胡適的自由主義思想[J];安徽商貿(mào)職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期
4 楊志為;;《努力周報(bào)》——中國(guó)自由主義知識(shí)分子的首度聚集[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2006年08期
5 馮夏根;丁文江研究述評(píng)[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期
6 耿云志;;胡適與抗戰(zhàn)[J];安徽史學(xué);1989年01期
7 智效民;丁文江這個(gè)人[J];讀書;1996年04期
8 奚霞;丁文江[J];民國(guó)檔案;1993年02期
9 馬麗娜;;丁文江的長(zhǎng)期抗日思想[J];淮北煤炭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年02期
10 馮夏根;丁文江與“好政府主義”[J];湖南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期
本文編號(hào)：2334952
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/2334952.html
最近更新
教材專著
