【摘要】：當(dāng)下研究國(guó)家為何過(guò)度擴(kuò)張的兩類分析路徑都不能解釋一個(gè)經(jīng)典案例:公元前415年雅典的西西里遠(yuǎn)征。因此,本研究結(jié)合現(xiàn)有兩類分析路徑,修改社會(huì)聯(lián)盟理論模型,并制作廣義推論。在該推論的幫助下,本研究發(fā)現(xiàn),雅典的帝國(guó)政策影響作為帝國(guó)中心的城邦的公共財(cái)政,并對(duì)城邦內(nèi)不同要素的所有者產(chǎn)生差異化的利得分配效應(yīng)。伯羅奔尼撒戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)爆發(fā)前,雅典帝國(guó)從和平政策中獲得可觀收入,形成敷益全體公民、尤其貼補(bǔ)勞動(dòng)者的財(cái)政結(jié)構(gòu)。戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)第一階段結(jié)束之后,帝國(guó)收入減少,但分配效應(yīng)極化,勞動(dòng)者從帝國(guó)的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)選項(xiàng)中獲益更多,與一貫傾向于帝國(guó)擴(kuò)張的港口商人群體形成新的社會(huì)聯(lián)盟。帝國(guó)政策的和平選項(xiàng)無(wú)法立足,大規(guī)模軍事遠(yuǎn)征西西里決策應(yīng)運(yùn)而出。其中勞動(dòng)者受到公共財(cái)政結(jié)構(gòu)演變影響而導(dǎo)致的對(duì)外政策偏好轉(zhuǎn)變,是雅典帝國(guó)政策轉(zhuǎn)向戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)選項(xiàng)、從而決定遠(yuǎn)征西西里、進(jìn)而重啟大戰(zhàn)的關(guān)鍵變量。面向古典學(xué),本研究試圖闡明雅典帝國(guó)主義的政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)機(jī)理,從制度角度解釋古今作家對(duì)民主政體的批評(píng)。面向國(guó)際政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué),面向過(guò)度擴(kuò)張的國(guó)內(nèi)政治過(guò)程這一問(wèn)題領(lǐng)域,本研究依據(jù)一項(xiàng)古老而重要的經(jīng)驗(yàn)證據(jù),有機(jī)結(jié)合現(xiàn)有兩大類分析路徑,為過(guò)度擴(kuò)張的國(guó)內(nèi)政治過(guò)程搭建新的復(fù)合理論框架。
[Abstract]:Neither of the current analytical pathways to study why countries overexpand can explain a classic case: the Sicilian expedition to Athens in 415 BC. Therefore, combining the existing two kinds of analytical paths, this study modifies the theoretical model of social alliance and makes generalized inference. With the help of this inference, this study finds that the imperial policy of Athens affects the public finances of the city-state, which is the center of the empire, and exerts a differentiated profit distribution effect on the owners of different elements in the city-state. Before the Peloponnesian War, the Athenian Empire received considerable income from its peace policy, forming a financial structure that benefited all citizens, especially workers. After the first stage of the war, the income of the empire decreased, but the distribution effect was polarized, the workers benefited more from the war options of the empire, and formed a new social alliance with the group of port businessmen who had always tended to expand the empire. The imperial policy of peace could not be established, and the decision of a large-scale military expedition to Sicily should be carried out. The change of foreign policy preference caused by the evolution of public finance structure is the key variable of Athens Imperial policy turning to war, which determines the expedition to Sicily and then restarts the war. In view of classical theory, this study attempts to clarify the political and economic mechanism of Athenian imperialism and to explain the criticism of democracy by ancient and modern writers from an institutional perspective. In the field of international political economy and over-expansion of domestic political process, this study is based on an ancient and important empirical evidence, organically combining the existing two kinds of analytical approaches. To build a new composite theoretical framework for the excessive expansion of domestic political process.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院世界經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：D091.2
，

本文編號(hào)：2302017