【摘要】：公共權(quán)力異化作為一種社會歷史現(xiàn)象,是各個國家在政治與經(jīng)濟發(fā)展過程中不得不面臨的一大難題。近年來,隨著我國在政治、經(jīng)濟等方面的改革不斷深化,公共權(quán)力異化現(xiàn)象也日漸突出。公共權(quán)力異化的本質(zhì)是,在公共管理過程中,公共權(quán)力運行的結(jié)果背離了其增進公共利益的目標,成為了公共權(quán)力代理人謀求私利的工具。公共權(quán)力異化對我國產(chǎn)生的消極影響主要體現(xiàn)在政治、經(jīng)濟和社會這三個領(lǐng)域。在政治領(lǐng)域,公共權(quán)力異化極大的損害了公共組織的公信力,疏遠了公共部門與公眾間的關(guān)系：在經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)域,公共權(quán)力異化破壞了市場的正常運行秩序,妨礙了市場資源配置職能的實現(xiàn)；在社會領(lǐng)域,公共權(quán)力異化破壞了公共組織對社會進行有序管理和提供公共服務(wù)等職能的實現(xiàn),妨礙了公共組織實現(xiàn)社會公平與穩(wěn)定的目標。面對如何遏制公共權(quán)力異化這一難題,黨和政府部門都予以了深切的關(guān)注。胡錦濤總書記更是針對當前的形勢,在2010年召開的十七屆中央紀委第五次全會上,強調(diào)要“堅決查處違紀違法案件,嚴肅查處發(fā)生在領(lǐng)導(dǎo)機關(guān)和領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部中濫用職權(quán)、貪污賄賂、腐化墮落、失職瀆職案件,決不讓任何腐敗分子逃脫黨紀國法懲處”,并深刻闡述了建設(shè)反腐倡廉制度體系對于黨和人民的重要性與緊迫性�？梢�,面對公共權(quán)力異化這一社會病態(tài)現(xiàn)象,只有通過逐步挖掘其內(nèi)在的成因,才能分析并找出制約公共權(quán)力異化的有效對策。 近幾年,隨著博弈論在經(jīng)濟、政治和社會等學(xué)科的廣泛應(yīng)用,博弈論的興起也為研究公共權(quán)力異化現(xiàn)象提供了一條新的路徑。由于公共權(quán)力代理人與公共權(quán)力所有者之間存在著委托一代理關(guān)系,并且公共權(quán)力的代理人和委托人符合博弈論中的一方先采取行動,而另一方根據(jù)當前的形勢采取適當對策的研究方式,因此假定公共權(quán)力的相關(guān)主體為“經(jīng)濟人”的假設(shè)上,嘗試構(gòu)建公共權(quán)力相關(guān)主體的動態(tài)博弈模型,對各相關(guān)主體進行博弈分析,能夠更有針對性的把握遏制公共權(quán)力異化的相關(guān)因素。 基于上述的思考,本文擬從公共權(quán)力異化的現(xiàn)實表現(xiàn)、危害和產(chǎn)生的一般成因入手,以博弈論為分析方法,在假定公共權(quán)力相關(guān)主體為“經(jīng)濟人”的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建一個涉及公共權(quán)力代理人、公共權(quán)力委托人和逐利人的三方兩階段動態(tài)博弈模型,求出三方的動態(tài)博弈均衡解,利用均衡解得出的相關(guān)結(jié)論,加深對公共權(quán)力異化問題的認識,并以此為基礎(chǔ)提出更為有效的制約公共權(quán)力異化的對策建議。
[Abstract]:As a social and historical phenomenon, the alienation of public power is a difficult problem that every country has to face in the process of political and economic development. In recent years, with the deepening of political and economic reforms in China, the alienation of public power has become increasingly prominent. The essence of public power alienation is that in the process of public management, the result of public power operation deviates from its goal of promoting public interests and becomes the tool for public power agents to seek private interests. The negative influence of public power alienation on our country is mainly reflected in three fields: politics, economy and society. In the political field, the alienation of public power has greatly damaged the credibility of public organizations and alienated the relationship between the public sector and the public: in the economic field, the alienation of public power has undermined the normal operation order of the market. In the social field, the alienation of public power destroys the realization of public organization's function of orderly management and provision of public service, and hinders the public organization to realize the goal of social equity and stability. Faced with the problem of how to curb the alienation of public power, both the Party and the government have paid close attention to it. In view of the current situation, General Secretary Hu Jintao, at the fifth plenary session of the 17th Central Commission for discipline Inspection, held in 2010, stressed the need to "resolutely investigate and deal with cases of violation of discipline and laws, and seriously investigate and deal with abuses of power among leading organs and leading cadres." Corruption and bribery, corruption, dereliction of duty and dereliction of duty will never allow any corrupt elements to escape the punishment of party discipline and state law, "and profoundly expounds the importance and urgency of building a system of combating corruption and advocating integrity for the party and the people. It can be seen that in the face of the social pathological phenomenon of alienation of public power, only by gradually excavating its internal causes, can we analyze and find out the effective countermeasures to restrict the alienation of public power. In recent years, with the wide application of game theory in economics, politics and society, the rise of game theory provides a new way to study the alienation of public power. Because there is a principal-agent relationship between the public power agent and the public power owner, and the agent and the principal of the public power conform to the game theory, On the assumption that the relevant subject of public power is "economic man", the other party tries to construct the dynamic game model of the relevant subject of public power. The game analysis of the relevant subjects can grasp the relevant factors of containing the alienation of public power more pertinently. Based on the above thinking, this paper intends to start with the practical manifestation, harm and general causes of the alienation of public power, taking the game theory as the analytical method, and based on the assumption that the relevant subject of public power is "economic man". This paper constructs a three-stage dynamic game model involving public power agent, public power trustor and profit-driven person, finds out the equilibrium solution of the three-party dynamic game, and makes use of the relevant conclusions of the equilibrium solution. To deepen the understanding of the alienation of public power, and put forward more effective countermeasures and suggestions to restrict the alienation of public power.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江西財經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D035

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 褚君;博弈論在歷史街區(qū)更新中的應(yīng)用研究[D];河北工業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

2 谷雨璐;網(wǎng)絡(luò)權(quán)力下的公民與政府委托代理關(guān)系分析[D];中國政法大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：2249904