本文選題：哈耶克 + 自發(fā)秩序��； 參考：《廣東社會(huì)科學(xué)》2014年04期

【摘要】：哈耶克的理論基于對(duì)兩個(gè)前后相繼的問(wèn)題的思考和解答,而分別進(jìn)行社會(huì)理論和政治理論的建構(gòu)。學(xué)界由于對(duì)于其政治理論論域的共同忽視,要么只關(guān)注其社會(huì)和法治理論,要么如Galeotti那樣,認(rèn)為其社會(huì)理論和政治理論之間存在內(nèi)在沖突和不一致。實(shí)際上,哈耶克不僅在社會(huì)哲學(xué)和法治理論上出現(xiàn)過(guò)重大的理論轉(zhuǎn)向;政治理論上也從最初的工具主義國(guó)家觀,轉(zhuǎn)向與其社會(huì)理論相適應(yīng)的"園丁式"國(guó)家觀,其政治理論與其社會(huì)哲學(xué)具有高度的契合性。
[Abstract]:Hayek's theory is based on the thinking and solution of two successive questions, and constructs social theory and political theory respectively. Due to the common neglect of his political theory domain, scholars either only pay attention to his social and legal theory, or, as Galeotti does, think that there is an inherent conflict and inconsistency between his social theory and political theory. In fact, Hayek has not only made a significant theoretical turn in social philosophy and the theory of the rule of law, but also in political theory has changed from the original instrumentalist view of the state to the "gardener" view of the state, which is compatible with his social theory. His political theory is highly consistent with his social philosophy.
【作者單位】： 吉林大學(xué)司法文明協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金青年項(xiàng)目“中國(guó)法治的知識(shí)批判與反思”(項(xiàng)目號(hào)13CFX002) 教育部人文社會(huì)科學(xué)研究一般項(xiàng)目“全球化、多元現(xiàn)代性與中國(guó)法治的路徑選擇”(項(xiàng)目號(hào)12YJC820065)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：D0

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘世強(qiáng);90年代國(guó)外政治理論新動(dòng)態(tài)[J];政治學(xué)研究;1995年01期

2 王儉;南京地區(qū)軍隊(duì)院校協(xié)作中心召開(kāi)在政治理論教學(xué)中貫徹十五大精神座談會(huì)[J];南京政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

3 楊金深;“三個(gè)代表”重要思想是當(dāng)代中國(guó)政治理論與經(jīng)濟(jì)理論的高度融合[J];河北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(農(nóng)林教育版);2004年03期

4 ;政治理論[J];全國(guó)新書(shū)目;2005年22期

5 倪邦瑞;;黨員應(yīng)過(guò)“政治生日”[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：2004037