本文選題：巴里巴爾 + 阿爾都塞��； 參考：《南京大學(xué)》2014年博士論文

【摘要】：本文以"巴里巴爾政治哲學(xué)研究"為題,立足于巴里巴爾文本,旨在于揭示長期被國內(nèi)外學(xué)界忽視的巴里巴爾政治哲學(xué)思想。這一研究的重要意義在于填補(bǔ)巴里巴爾學(xué)術(shù)研究的理論空白,把一直鮮為人知的巴里巴爾形象揭示出來,并有助于我們?nèi)媪私獍柖既捌鋱F(tuán)隊的理論轉(zhuǎn)向。論文的主要貢獻(xiàn)和創(chuàng)新之處在于:(1)從法國當(dāng)代哲學(xué)同德國古典哲學(xué)語境的差異角度,探討阿爾都塞為什么會超越黑格爾和費(fèi)爾巴哈,將斯賓諾莎哲學(xué)作為馬克思思想的源頭。(2)從巴里巴爾與阿爾都塞思想的差異中,尋求巴里巴爾理論轉(zhuǎn)向的意義,及其對阿爾都塞思想發(fā)展的影響。(3)立足于巴里巴爾文本和斯賓諾莎文本,全面揭示巴里巴爾對斯賓諾莎政治哲學(xué)的吸收與發(fā)展。(4)始終堅持歷史唯物主義的方法論,對巴里巴爾的歷史唯物主義政治化的解讀進(jìn)行反思和批判,進(jìn)一步深化歷史唯物主義方法論的當(dāng)代意義。(5)從思想史的角度,勾勒斯賓諾莎政治哲學(xué)概念如何轉(zhuǎn)化成當(dāng)今巴里巴爾政治哲學(xué)概念,并輔之以時代背景,突出概念變遷的歷史內(nèi)涵�；谏鲜瞿繕�(biāo),本文除導(dǎo)論以外分為四章。第一章,探討了巴里巴爾和阿爾都塞的學(xué)術(shù)傳承關(guān)系,巴里巴爾如何進(jìn)一步深化阿爾都塞提出的但沒有深入展開的問題。阿爾都塞認(rèn)為要成為真正的馬克思主義者,必須超越德國古典哲學(xué),回到斯賓諾莎哲學(xué),巴里巴爾按照這條思路,從階級斷裂、政治斗爭角度,將阿爾都塞的斷裂說發(fā)展成階級斷裂說。第二章,從文本學(xué)的角度梳理巴里巴爾的《斯賓諾莎與政治》及其所對應(yīng)的三本著作《神學(xué)政治論》、《政治論》和《倫理學(xué)》,探討斯賓諾莎政治哲學(xué)對巴里巴爾的影響。斯賓諾莎的"政治體"成了巴里巴爾建構(gòu)國家與個人關(guān)系的理論基礎(chǔ),巴里巴爾從民主最大化,統(tǒng)治階級統(tǒng)治的角度,將政治統(tǒng)治問題轉(zhuǎn)化為政治倫理問題,并引入人類學(xué)視角來重釋認(rèn)同問題。第三章,巴里巴爾對歷史唯物主義的政治化解讀,始終是為了尋求當(dāng)代激進(jìn)解放的民主話語,他從階級與意識形態(tài)兩條線索否定了無產(chǎn)階級充當(dāng)歷史主體的可能性,徹底解構(gòu)歷史本質(zhì)論,從個體斗爭的角度,將個體的認(rèn)同與個體同權(quán)力的斗爭結(jié)合起來,歷史將不再是充滿矛盾具有歷史發(fā)生學(xué)意義的歷史,成了片段化的政治主體斗爭的歷史,歷史唯物主義轉(zhuǎn)化成政治唯物主義。第四章,巴里巴爾描述資本主義全球化時代勞動主體在非階級領(lǐng)域的差異與不平等,提出與經(jīng)濟(jì)全球化相適應(yīng)的政治全球化的主張,強(qiáng)調(diào)在差異中尋求認(rèn)同,形成超越身份差異的全球公民,并以歐洲為模板,打造超越歐洲邊界的"新歐洲公民",雖然,他的本意是形成群眾的絕對民主,結(jié)果卻成了精英統(tǒng)治的新話語。
[Abstract]:With the title of "the study of Balbaal's political philosophy", based on the Balebar text, this paper aims to reveal the thought of Balebar's political philosophy which has long been neglected by scholars at home and abroad. The significance of this study is to fill in the theoretical gap of Barry Barr's academic research, to reveal the image of Barry Barr, which has been unknown for a long time, and to help us fully understand the theoretical turn of Althusser and his team. The main contribution and innovation of the thesis lies in: (1) from the perspective of the differences between contemporary French philosophy and German classical philosophy, this paper explores why Althusser surpasses Hegel and Feuerbach, and explores why Althusser surpasses Hegel and Feuerbach. Taking Spinoza's philosophy as the source of Marx's thought, from the difference between Barry Barr's and Althusser's thought, the author seeks the significance of the turn of Barry Barr's theory. And its influence on the development of Althusser's thought. 3) based on the Balabar and Spinoza texts, it reveals in an all-round way the absorption and development of Spinoza's political philosophy by Bari Barr) and always adheres to the methodology of historical materialism. Reflecting on and criticizing the interpretation of the politicization of historical materialism by Barry Barr, and further deepening the contemporary significance of the methodology of historical materialism.) from the perspective of the history of thought, This paper outlines how Spinoza's concept of political philosophy is transformed into the concept of political philosophy of Bari Barr nowadays, supplemented by the background of the times, and highlights the historical connotation of the change of concepts. Based on the above objectives, this paper is divided into four chapters except the introduction. The first chapter discusses the relationship between Barry Barr and Althusser, and how to deepen the problems raised by Althusser. Althusser believed that in order to become a true Marxist, he must go beyond classical German philosophy and return to Spinoza's philosophy. Develop Althusser's theory of fracture into class theory. In the second chapter, from the perspective of textology, the author discusses the influence of Spinoza's political philosophy on Bari Barr's political philosophy by combing Balabar's Spinoza and Politics and his corresponding three books, "Theological Politics", "political Theory" and "Ethics". Spinoza's "political body" has become the theoretical basis for the construction of the relationship between the state and the individual. From the point of view of democracy maximization and ruling class rule, Barbibal transforms the issue of political rule into a political ethical issue. And the introduction of anthropological perspective to re-explain the issue of identity. In the third chapter, Bari Barr's political interpretation of historical materialism is always for the purpose of seeking the democratic discourse of contemporary radical liberation. He denies the possibility of the proletariat acting as the subject of history from two clues of class and ideology. By thoroughly deconstructing the historical essence theory and combining individual identity with individual power struggle from the angle of individual struggle, history will no longer be a history full of contradictions with historical significance. It has become the history of the struggle of the political subject, and the historical materialism has been transformed into the political materialism. The fourth chapter describes the differences and inequalities of labor subjects in the non-class field in the era of capitalist globalization, and puts forward the idea of political globalization, which is compatible with economic globalization, and emphasizes seeking identification among the differences. To form a global citizen who transcends identity differences and uses Europe as a template to create a "new European citizen" who transcends Europe's borders, although his intention was to form absolute democracy for the masses, it turned out to be a new discourse of elite rule.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D0
，

本文編號：1975221