本文選題：平均主義 + 平等　； 參考：《河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年02期

【摘要】：平均主義是對(duì)平等的誤解,是與馬克思主義的科學(xué)社會(huì)主義毫不相干的。改革開放以來,平均主義成為學(xué)界研究的一個(gè)重點(diǎn)和難點(diǎn)問題。由于平均主義問題的復(fù)雜性,學(xué)界在研究平均主義思想時(shí)仍然存在諸多理論誤區(qū)。這些理論誤區(qū)主要表現(xiàn)在:對(duì)平均主義和平等的概念不能科學(xué)界定,對(duì)平均主義和平等的內(nèi)涵認(rèn)識(shí)不清;在平均主義是否具有先進(jìn)性的問題上,不少學(xué)者仍然認(rèn)為平均主義具有一定的先進(jìn)性;不能正確區(qū)分平均主義產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟(jì)根源、思想根源和文化根源之間的關(guān)系,對(duì)平均主義產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟(jì)根源不能準(zhǔn)確定位;在對(duì)毛澤東追求的是平等還是平均主義的問題上,仍然認(rèn)為毛澤東追求的是平均主義而不是平等。對(duì)新時(shí)期以來平均主義研究中若干理論誤區(qū)進(jìn)行實(shí)事求是的馬克思主義的理論分析,目的在于澄清理論是非、推進(jìn)平等社會(huì)建設(shè)進(jìn)程,促進(jìn)社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值觀建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Equalitarianism is a misunderstanding of equality and has nothing to do with Marxist scientific socialism. Since the reform and opening up, equalitarianism has become an important and difficult problem in academic research. Due to the complexity of equalitarianism, there are still many theoretical misunderstandings in the study of equalitarianism. These theoretical errors are mainly manifested in: the concept of egalitarianism and equality cannot be scientifically defined, the connotation of egalitarianism and equality is not clear, and the question of whether egalitarianism is advanced or not, Many scholars still think that egalitarianism has a certain advanced nature, that it can not correctly distinguish the economic root of equalitarianism, the relationship between ideological root and cultural root, and that the economic root produced by egalitarianism cannot be accurately positioned. On the question of whether Mao Zedong pursues equality or egalitarianism, it is still considered that Mao Zedong pursues equalitarianism rather than equality. In order to clarify whether the theory is right or wrong, to promote the process of equal society construction and to promote the construction of socialist core values, the theoretical analysis of some theoretical misunderstandings in equalitarianism research since the new era is aimed at seeking truth from facts.
【作者單位】： 周口師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)編輯部;
【分類號(hào)】：D601

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 王廷湘;黨國英;;建立現(xiàn)代企業(yè)制度的若干理論誤區(qū)[A];當(dāng)今中國經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)八大理論熱點(diǎn)[C];1994年

2 呂偉俊;董寶訓(xùn);;略論建國初期中國社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型的幾個(gè)理論誤區(qū)[A];中國現(xiàn)代社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型問題學(xué)術(shù)討論會(huì)論文集[C];2002年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 洛陽師范學(xué)院政法與公共管理學(xué)院 陳艷風(fēng);走出法學(xué)實(shí)證研究理論誤區(qū)[N];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2014年

2 本報(bào)記者 劉國旺;“江蘇第一爆”爆出了啥[N];中國財(cái)經(jīng)報(bào);2009年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 袁暢彥;森林資源估價(jià)的理論誤區(qū)及方法修正研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1897648