本文選題：定量研究 + 定性研究��； 參考：《國外社會科學(xué)》2016年04期

【摘要】：自20世紀80年代以來,國內(nèi)社會科學(xué)諸學(xué)科經(jīng)歷恢復(fù)與重建,與西方學(xué)界的交流、互動日漸頻繁。在新一輪西學(xué)東漸的大潮中,西方學(xué)界所推崇的定量分析法漸次為國內(nèi)政治學(xué)界所接納。當下學(xué)界重定量貶定性,揚量化抑質(zhì)化,大有不可遏止之勢。本文基于對過去30年來美國政治學(xué)界圍繞方法論的論辯,客觀呈現(xiàn)定量與定性研究方法的優(yōu)劣,探討當前方法論中定量定性研究的融合趨勢,冀希國內(nèi)學(xué)者審慎面對定量研究。
[Abstract]:Since the 1980's, the subjects of social science in China have experienced rehabilitation and reconstruction, and the interaction between them has become more and more frequent. In the new tide of western learning spreading eastward, the quantitative analysis method respected by western scholars was accepted gradually by domestic political circles. At present, the academic circles emphasize quantitative derogation and increase quantification and depress quality, which has an irresistible tendency. Based on the debate on methodology in American political circles in the past 30 years, this paper presents objectively the advantages and disadvantages of quantitative and qualitative research methods, and probes into the fusion trend of quantitative and qualitative research in current methodology.
【作者單位】： 南京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院;南京大學(xué)亞太發(fā)展中心;
【分類號】：D0

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 雷志宇;;論對定性研究之重新界定[J];嶺南學(xué)刊;2007年04期

，

本文編號：1894251