本文選題：清季民初 + 主體觀念　； 參考：《學習與探索》2017年07期

【摘要】：主體觀念是現(xiàn)代哲學的基石,也是現(xiàn)代性的基石。清季民初以來,隨著西方現(xiàn)代性在中國的展開,主體觀念逐步成了當時絕大多數(shù)知識分子的信仰。然而,在章太炎、王國維以及魯迅的思想深處,可以發(fā)現(xiàn)一條不同于當時主流精神傳統(tǒng)的思想譜系。對于章太炎來說,將"人"視為世界的主體是現(xiàn)代主體的幻想;在王國維筆下,主體的欲望而不是理性才是主體的本質性規(guī)定;就魯迅而言,主體的未來未必是通往至善的烏托邦,必將陷于循環(huán)和虛無之中。他們對現(xiàn)代性之主體觀念的警惕與反思,不僅是對傳統(tǒng)文化中幽暗意識的繼承和發(fā)揚,也是對現(xiàn)代性合法性敘事的解構。因此,對其進行比較分析有助于從新的范式上了解近現(xiàn)代中國思想市場的真實生態(tài)。
[Abstract]:The concept of subject is the cornerstone of modern philosophy and also the cornerstone of modernity. Since the beginning of Qing Dynasty and early Republic of China, with the development of western modernity in China, the concept of subject gradually became the belief of most intellectuals at that time. However, in the depth of Zhang Taiyan, Wang Guowei and Lu Xun, we can find a genealogy of thought which is different from the mainstream spiritual tradition of that time. For Zhang Taiyan, it is the fantasy of modern subjects to regard "human beings" as the subject of the world; in Wang Guowei's works, the desire of the subject rather than reason is the essential rule of the subject; as far as Lu Xun is concerned, The subject's future is not necessarily a utopia leading to the best, but a cycle and nothingness. Their vigilance and reflection on the concept of the subject of modernity are not only the inheritance and development of the dark consciousness in the traditional culture, but also the deconstruction of the narrative of the legitimacy of modernity. Therefore, the comparative analysis is helpful to understand the real ecology of modern Chinese thought market from the new paradigm.
【作者單位】： 對外經(jīng)濟貿易大學國際關系學院;
【分類號】：D092
，

本文編號：1863532