本文選題：哈耶克 + 弗格森�。� 參考：《晉陽(yáng)學(xué)刊》2013年03期

【摘要】：蘇格蘭啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)構(gòu)成了哈耶克龐雜的學(xué)術(shù)思考和著述的一個(gè)重要來(lái)源。作為蘇格蘭啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)重要代表人物的亞當(dāng).弗格森當(dāng)然也不例外,盡管與亞當(dāng).斯密和休謨比起來(lái),他對(duì)哈耶克的影響要小一些,但是他卻在一些關(guān)鍵的觀點(diǎn)上啟發(fā)了哈耶克。其中最為重要的當(dāng)屬弗格森對(duì)社會(huì)秩序如何形成的思考對(duì)哈耶克的重要啟發(fā)。有趣的是,正是哈耶克本人在他的浩繁著述中不斷地提及弗格森對(duì)他的影響,使得哈耶克的闡釋者們基本上追隨了哈耶克的相關(guān)論述,從而采納了哈耶克對(duì)弗格森的思想定位,而從未深入弗格森的相關(guān)論述來(lái)考察他與哈耶克在社會(huì)-政治思想方面的傳承關(guān)系,更沒(méi)有對(duì)弗格森政治思想的定位作出有別于哈耶克的判斷。因而,要充分把握哈耶克與弗格森政治思想的傳承關(guān)系必須深入弗格森思想的內(nèi)部,也唯有如此才能驗(yàn)證哈耶克相關(guān)定位的準(zhǔn)確性。
[Abstract]:The Scottish Enlightenment constituted an important source of Hayek's complex academic thinking and writings. Adam, an important representative of the Scottish Enlightenment. Ferguson is certainly no exception, though with Adam. Smith and Hume had less influence on Hayek, but he inspired Hayek on some key points. One of the most important is Ferguson's thinking on how to form the social order for Hayek's important inspiration. Interestingly, it is Hayek himself who, in his numerous writings, keeps talking about Ferguson's influence on him, so that Hayek's hermeneutics basically follow Hayek's arguments and thus adopt Hayek's position of thinking about Ferguson. But he never went deep into Ferguson's related expositions to examine the inheritance relationship between him and Hayek in social-political thought, and he did not judge Ferguson's political thought differently from Hayek's. Therefore, in order to fully grasp the relationship between Hayek and Ferguson's political thought, it is necessary to penetrate into the interior of Ferguson's thought, and only in this way can the accuracy of Hayek's relevant positioning be verified.
【作者單位】： 貴州省社會(huì)科學(xué)院《貴州社會(huì)科學(xué)》編輯部;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D091

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梁峰;規(guī)則與自發(fā)秩序:哈耶克社會(huì)理論的構(gòu)建[J];學(xué)海;2004年02期

2 陳國(guó)權(quán),徐露輝;有限政府:一種知識(shí)論的視角[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年05期

3 張琛;;淺析哈耶克自發(fā)秩序及其對(duì)中國(guó)政治發(fā)展的啟示[J];世紀(jì)橋;2011年15期

4 蔣俊杰;哈耶克的“自發(fā)秩序觀”初探[J];江淮論壇;2004年02期

5 劉軍寧;;無(wú)知與自由之間——從當(dāng)代西方學(xué)者哈耶克的政治思想談起[J];鄉(xiāng)音;2002年01期

6 袁久紅;哈耶克自由主義正義論析評(píng)[J];東南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

7 李s，

本文編號(hào)：1838203