本文選題：認(rèn)知性民主 + 公共決策模式��； 參考：《甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報》2014年04期

【摘要】：在理性認(rèn)知的民主政體中,一種令人滿意的決策模式必須借助對于相關(guān)知識的考量,達(dá)到既尊重民主價值又增進(jìn)公民利益的目標(biāo)。通過對亞里士多德著作某些篇章和古代雅典立法過程的分析,一種處于獨立意志的集聚與協(xié)商之間的"中道"呈現(xiàn)出來:它提供了令人滿意的集體判斷模式的決策的認(rèn)知途徑,而且其既有時效性,又可內(nèi)源性地設(shè)置議程。相關(guān)專業(yè)知識的聚合(REA)模型通過聚合跨領(lǐng)域的專業(yè)知識,可使一群具備最基本能力的選民在關(guān)乎公共利益的問題上,于多個選項間進(jìn)行擇優(yōu)選擇。與標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的孔多塞陪審團(tuán)不同,REA基于對專家的聲譽(yù)和主張的判斷,將協(xié)商與投票兩種方式結(jié)合起來。
[Abstract]:In a rational perceived democracy, a satisfactory decision-making model must be based on the consideration of relevant knowledge to achieve the goal of respecting the value of democracy and promoting the interests of citizens.Through the analysis of some chapters of Aristotle's works and the legislative process of ancient Athens, a kind of "middle way" between the agglomeration of independent will and the negotiation is presented: it provides a cognitive way for the decision-making of satisfactory collective judgment model.And its both timeliness, but also endogenous setting of the agenda.By aggregating cross-domain expertise, a group of voters with the most basic abilities can choose among several options on issues related to the public interest.Unlike the standard Condoleezza jury, the REA combines negotiation with voting based on its judgment of the reputation and claims of experts.
【作者單位】： 斯坦福大學(xué)政治學(xué)系;曲阜師范大學(xué)日照校區(qū)政治與公共管理學(xué)院;中共中央黨校政法部;
【基金】：2010年國家重大招標(biāo)課題“當(dāng)代中國公民思想道德素質(zhì)與中國社會文明程度研究”(編號:10&ZD049)的子課題“政治文明與當(dāng)代中國社會文明發(fā)展程度”
【分類號】：D082
，

本文編號：1740895