本文選題：強(qiáng)制 + 資本��； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為當(dāng)今世界最普遍的政治組織體系,現(xiàn)代民族國家依然是國際社會最重要的活動主體�，F(xiàn)代民族國家最早產(chǎn)生于西歐,是西歐國家形態(tài)逐步演進(jìn)的產(chǎn)物,也是西歐世界歷史發(fā)展的過程,不同的歷史以及形態(tài)各異的國情,導(dǎo)致西方國家在向民族國家的演進(jìn)過程形成各自迥異的轉(zhuǎn)變路徑。而關(guān)于現(xiàn)代民族國家形成的理論汗牛充棟,無論是馬克思.韋伯亦或是安東尼.吉登斯,都是從強(qiáng)制的角度出發(fā)來分析民族國家的形成模式,查爾斯.蒂利在繼承和批判前人的基礎(chǔ)上創(chuàng)造性地提出了影響民族國家形成的更深刻的動力——資本,強(qiáng)制和資本共同主導(dǎo)者歐洲民族國家的形成。其關(guān)于現(xiàn)代民族國家形成理論的提出頗具代表性,強(qiáng)制和資本的邏輯也為我們分析其他民族國家的形成提供了良好的模型和框架。而中國作為世界上唯一一個歷史沒有中斷的文明古國,伴隨著西方列強(qiáng)的船堅(jiān)炮利進(jìn)入了“千年未有之變局”,傳統(tǒng)的政治制度和政治文化在西方文明的沖擊之下出現(xiàn)了全面的危機(jī),中國由此走上了民族國家形成之路。與早期歐洲民族國家的形成相比,作為外生型的中國的民族國家形成與之有顯著地差異,因此深入挖掘近代中國民族國家形成的成長邏輯,對于豐富現(xiàn)代民族國家理論仍然具有重要的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值。本文主要基于對蒂利的“強(qiáng)制”和“資本”兩大變量進(jìn)行了重新解構(gòu)和改造,對強(qiáng)制和資本的具體內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了深入的挖掘與劃分,提出強(qiáng)制的三大要素：軍隊(duì)、財(cái)政機(jī)制和官僚體制以及資本的三大要素：城市、資本家和代議制民主。通過運(yùn)用以上改造的強(qiáng)制和資本的分析框架,對近代中國強(qiáng)制和資本的各自演變邏輯進(jìn)行了深入的剖析,據(jù)此將文章分為五部分：第一章主要是針對關(guān)于中國民族國家形成理論學(xué)術(shù)研究的梳理與回顧；第二章通過對強(qiáng)制和資本的分析模式的解構(gòu)與重塑來搭建本文的研究框架；第三章主要分析和呈現(xiàn)出強(qiáng)制在近代中國的發(fā)展演變,從而得出軍隊(duì)武裝的控制權(quán)、財(cái)政機(jī)制亦或是傳統(tǒng)官僚體制都在經(jīng)歷衰敗的同時(shí)意味著新一輪的重塑和轉(zhuǎn)型,并逐步向民族國家的模式邁進(jìn)；第四章分析了資本在近代中國的發(fā)展變遷：隨著商業(yè)和對外貿(mào)易發(fā)展以及城市化水平的提高促進(jìn)了資本的加速積累,民族資本家實(shí)力逐步增強(qiáng)成為中國民族國家形成的主導(dǎo)力量；第五章則通過”強(qiáng)制—資本”的研究框架對近代中國六大要素在近代中國的關(guān)系狀態(tài),探索出中國民族國家形成的特殊性及其成長邏輯。
[Abstract]:As the most universal political organization system in the world, modern nation-state is still the most important main body of international society.The modern nation-state was first produced in Western Europe. It is the product of the gradual evolution of the form of Western European countries. It is also a process of historical development in the world of Western Europe, with different histories and different forms of national conditions.As a result, Western countries have different paths in the process of evolution from nation-state to nation-state.And the theory about the formation of modern nation-state is full of money, no matter Marx.Weber or Anthony.Giddens, from the point of view of compulsion to analyze the formation of nation-state, Charles.On the basis of inheriting and criticizing the predecessors, Tilly creatively puts forward the more profound motive force that influences the formation of nation-state-capital, compulsion and capital co-dominating the formation of European nation-state.Its theory on the formation of modern nation-state is representative, and the logic of compulsion and capital also provides a good model and framework for us to analyze the formation of other nation-states.China, as the only ancient civilization in the world that has not been interrupted in history, has entered the "unprecedented change of the millennium" along with the ship of the Western powers.Under the impact of western civilization, the traditional political system and political culture have brought about a crisis, and China has thus embarked on the road of nation-state formation.Compared with the formation of the early European nation-state, there is a significant difference between the formation of the nation-state of China as an exogenous type and the formation of the nation-state, so the growth logic of the formation of the nation-state in modern China is deeply explored.It still has important academic value for enriching the theory of modern nation-state.Based on the deconstruction and transformation of Tilly's two major variables of "compulsion" and "capital", this paper deeply excavates and classifies the specific contents of compulsion and capital, and puts forward three elements of coercion: the army.Financial mechanism and bureaucracy and three elements of capital: city, capitalists and representative democracy.Through the use of the above transformation of the mandatory and capital analysis framework, the modern Chinese mandatory and capital evolution of the logic of the respective in-depth analysis,According to this, the article is divided into five parts: the first chapter is mainly aimed at combing and reviewing the academic research on the formation theory of China's nation-state, the second chapter sets up the research frame of this paper by deconstructing and reshaping the analytical model of compulsion and capital.The third chapter mainly analyzes and presents the development and evolution of compulsion in modern China, and concludes that the control of the armed forces, the financial mechanism or the traditional bureaucratic system are all going through a decline, which means a new round of remodeling and transformation.The fourth chapter analyzes the development and changes of capital in modern China: with the development of commerce and foreign trade and the improvement of urbanization level, it promotes the accelerated accumulation of capital.The strength of national capitalists has gradually become the leading force in the formation of China's nation-state. Chapter five, through the research framework of "compulsory-capital", analyzes the relationship between the six elements of modern China in modern China.To explore the particularity of the formation of China's nation-state and its growth logic.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：D032

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 戴輝禮;;現(xiàn)代國家構(gòu)建與民主化中的歐洲經(jīng)驗(yàn)及其啟示[J];國際關(guān)系學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

2 郁建興;;治理與國家建構(gòu)的張力[J];馬克思主義與現(xiàn)實(shí);2008年01期

3 王玲;;論權(quán)力集散與國家演進(jìn)[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2007年01期

4 徐勇;;“回歸國家”與現(xiàn)代國家的建構(gòu)[J];東南學(xué)術(shù);2006年04期

，

本文編號：1734495