本文選題：中國研究　切入點：比較政治學(xué)　出處：《國外社會科學(xué)》2014年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：當代中國政治研究最具影響力的著作為什么沒有對比較政治學(xué)產(chǎn)生顯著影響?本文通過對42份比較政治學(xué)課程教學(xué)大綱的定量分析指出:首先,由于有關(guān)中國學(xué)研究成果大多傾向于發(fā)表在區(qū)域研究刊物上,導(dǎo)致這些成果與其他學(xué)科領(lǐng)域相隔絕;其次,這些研究僅圍繞以中國政治為唯一導(dǎo)向的話題展開,失去了廣闊的比較視角的潛力;最后,西方比較政治學(xué)似乎已陷入所謂的"民主棱鏡"(democratic prism)之中,使得比較政治學(xué)研究在方法和概念層面存在既定框架,進而影響相關(guān)研究者,導(dǎo)致這一領(lǐng)域的學(xué)者難以適應(yīng)有關(guān)中國崛起、發(fā)展及與之相伴的改變學(xué)科傳統(tǒng)觀念的爭論,并限制了學(xué)者對比較政治學(xué)核心議題的理解。
[Abstract]:Why did the most influential works in contemporary Chinese political studies not have a significant impact on comparative politics? Based on the quantitative analysis of 42 syllabuses of comparative political science, this paper points out that, first of all, most of the research results of Chinese studies tend to be published in regional research journals, which leads to the separation of these achievements from other disciplines. These studies have only focused on the topic of Chinese politics as the sole guide, and have lost the potential for a broad comparative perspective. Finally, comparative politics in the West seems to have fallen into the so-called "democratic prism" of democracy. It makes the comparative political science research have an established framework in terms of methodology and concept, and then influence the relevant researchers, which makes it difficult for scholars in this field to adapt to the debate about the rise and development of China and the accompanying changes in the traditional concept of the discipline. It also limits scholars' understanding of the core issues of comparative politics.
【作者單位】： 加拿大蒙特利爾大學(xué);北京大學(xué)政府管理學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D0
，

本文編號：1646888