本文選題：盧梭　切入點：原初激情　出處：《東南學(xué)術(shù)》2017年05期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：近代政治哲人放棄古典政治哲人理性成人的理想。但既然漠視理性權(quán)威,政治共同體的最高權(quán)威就只能是善于操縱激情的君主。鑒于此,盧梭試圖重拾成人的理想,且把成人建立在原初激情的自足之上。然則,原初激情之自足卻受到歷史時間的威脅,這樣,盧梭就被迫通過自由來保護原初激情。但自由的實現(xiàn)又必然呼喚著古典理性立法者。至此,近代政治哲人以激情為基礎(chǔ)的政制困境在盧梭這里得到徹底的表現(xiàn),即走向自己的反面。
[Abstract]:Modern political philosophers gave up the ideal of rational adults of classical political philosophers. But since rational authority was ignored, the supreme authority of political communities could only be a master of passion. In view of this, Rousseau tried to regain the ideal of adulthood. And build adults on the self-sufficiency of the original passion. But the self-sufficiency of the original passion is threatened by the time of history, Rousseau was forced to protect the original passion through freedom, but the realization of freedom was bound to call for the classical rational legislator. So far, the political dilemma of modern political philosophers based on passion was thoroughly manifested in Rousseau. That is to go to their opposite.
【作者單位】： 華僑大學(xué)生活哲學(xué)研究中心;
【基金】：福建省社會科學(xué)基地重大項目“政治生活中的非理性問題研究”(項目編號:2016JDZ055)
【分類號】：D091
，

本文編號：1634422