本文關鍵詞： 家庭 國家 差序格局 公私關系 公共性　出處：《中國社會科學》2017年10期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：血緣既是人之自然情感的來源、家庭的紐帶,又可能成為更大規(guī)模的社會組織如國家構成和運行的問題。檢視作為西方思想和社會主要起點之一的柏拉圖和亞里士多德思想中的相關論述,有助于中國社會學界對血緣在社會構成中的邏輯后果研究的深化。在柏拉圖、亞里士多德關于家國關系的思想中,血緣被視為"友愛"這一人類普遍自然情感的根源,其內(nèi)在的親疏遠近之區(qū)分在社會層面也得到一定關注;但這種自然情感會妨礙在城邦中構建普遍化的友愛關系,是德性和欲望、公和私、城邦和家對立的源頭。因此,他們試圖在制度層面消除或限制其作用領域,防止其對城邦目標和運行的破壞。這一社會構想,源于"雙重自然"的理論預設。柏拉圖和亞里士多德關于家國關系的想象對于現(xiàn)代西方的家國關系設計影響深遠。
[Abstract]:The source of natural emotion is not only man's blood, family ties, and may become a social problem such as the national constitution and operation organization. As a larger view of Western thought and related discussion of the social main starting point of Platon and Aristotle thought, helps to deepen Chinese Social Research on the blood in the society constitute the logical consequences in. In Platon, Aristotle on the national relations thought, blood is regarded as a "source of love" the universal human nature of emotion, the closeness of the distinction in the social level has also been a concern; but this will hinder the construction of universal natural emotion friendly relations in the city is. Virtue and desire, public and private, the source of city and home opposition. Therefore, they are trying to eliminate or restrict the effect of system level, to prevent the target and operation of the broken city Bad. This social conception originates from the theoretical presupposition of "dual nature". Platon and Aristotle's imagination about the relationship between family and family has far-reaching influence on the design of modern western family relationship.

【作者單位】： 上海大學社會學院;
【分類號】：D091

【相似文獻】

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 中國人民大學哲學院中國哲學專業(yè)2012級博士生 秦際明;君統(tǒng)、宗統(tǒng)與家國關系[N];光明日報;2013年

相關碩士學位論文 前1條

1 石偉杰;分離與重構:近代中國家國關系的多重變奏[D];華東師范大學;2015年

，

本文編號：1544949