伯吉斯與清末的國(guó)家形體、政府形體區(qū)分學(xué)說(shuō)
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-02-12 21:16
本文關(guān)鍵詞: 伯吉斯 國(guó)家形體 政府形體 出處:《政治思想史》2017年03期 論文類型:期刊論文
【摘要】:清末以東學(xué)為媒介接引西學(xué)后,"國(guó)家""政府"的語(yǔ)義急遽轉(zhuǎn)變且呈現(xiàn)出混用的一面,在此背景下,美國(guó)著名政治學(xué)家伯吉斯的學(xué)說(shuō)輸入具有獨(dú)特意義。伯吉斯以有無(wú)主權(quán)為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)嚴(yán)格辨別"國(guó)家""政府",進(jìn)而在此基礎(chǔ)上提出極具個(gè)人特色的"國(guó)家形體""政府形體"區(qū)分學(xué)說(shuō),其觀點(diǎn)是針對(duì)本土國(guó)情有意與歐洲學(xué)界立異的表現(xiàn)。伯吉斯的學(xué)說(shuō)傳入中國(guó)并非原樣翻刻,在理解運(yùn)用的過(guò)程中多有變異取舍,同時(shí)對(duì)國(guó)人的政治觀念和實(shí)踐有深遠(yuǎn)影響。
[Abstract]:In the end of Qing Dynasty, the meaning of "state" and "government" changed sharply after the introduction of western learning through Eastology as a medium. In this context, the meaning of "state" "government" changed sharply and showed a mixed use. Burgess, a famous American political scientist, has a unique significance in theory input. Burgess strictly distinguishes "state" and "government" according to the criterion of whether he has sovereignty or not, and then puts forward the theory of distinguishing "state form" and "government form" with individual characteristics. Burgess's theory introduced into China is not original, there are many variations in the process of understanding and application, at the same time, it has a profound influence on the political concept and practice of Chinese people.
【作者單位】: 中山大學(xué)歷史系;
【分類號(hào)】:D092
,
本文編號(hào):1506578
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zhengzx/1506578.html
最近更新
教材專著