漢末袁術(shù)集團(tuán)研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-27 06:53
【摘要】：袁術(shù)集團(tuán)是一支活躍在東漢末年的重要軍閥勢力。袁術(shù)集團(tuán)得益于袁術(shù)的名門聲望,善于聯(lián)合諸方勢力,因而得以迅速崛起并具備了不可小覷的實(shí)力。僭號事件是袁術(shù)集團(tuán)興衰的轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn),袁術(shù)集團(tuán)的瓦解是沿襲漢末流弊的結(jié)果。第一章主要論述袁術(shù)集團(tuán)的形成與發(fā)展。第一節(jié)簡述袁術(shù)集團(tuán)崛起的背景。在東漢外戚和宦官初見交融的情況下,何氏集團(tuán)擊敗董氏集團(tuán)取得中平六年新君之爭的勝利后,又陷入內(nèi)部宦官勢力與豪族勢力的沖突�；鹿俸屯馄莸膬蓴【銈尡緩膶儆诤芜M(jìn)的董卓與袁術(shù)袁紹得以崛起。董卓將袁術(shù)袁紹逼出洛陽,拉開了東漢豪族混戰(zhàn)的序幕。第二節(jié)簡述袁術(shù)集團(tuán)的早期活動。袁術(shù)出奔南陽反抗董卓,袁術(shù)集團(tuán)開始形成。依靠虎賁舊部和孫堅(jiān)的依附,袁術(shù)集團(tuán)勢如破竹,連敗董卓。隨著董卓戰(zhàn)略收縮和遷都長安,二袁走向失和。袁術(shù)拉攏孫堅(jiān)公孫瓚陶謙,袁紹拉攏曹操臧洪劉表,形成了兩大軍事同盟的對峙。袁術(shù)同盟先勝后敗,封丘大戰(zhàn)敗于曹操后袁術(shù)徹底失去荊州,由此戰(zhàn)略重心轉(zhuǎn)向徐揚(yáng)。第二章集中探討袁術(shù)集團(tuán)的僭號問題。第一節(jié)分析袁術(shù)僭號的背景原因。袁術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)戰(zhàn)徐揚(yáng)后,逐陳溫、驅(qū)劉繇、敗劉備、聯(lián)呂布、攏臧霸、掌八郡,跨徐揚(yáng)豫三州迎來了全盛時期。實(shí)力強(qiáng)大和周邊利好的軍事形勢使得袁術(shù)集團(tuán)具備了僭號的資本。曹操南侵袁術(shù)入豫州,迎天子都許給袁術(shù)造成了沉重的政治壓力,直接引發(fā)了僭號之策。仰仗親信和部分依附勢力的支持,袁術(shù)集團(tuán)得以力排名士大族及孫氏的反對,通過了僭號之策。僭號事件實(shí)際上是東漢末年漢家觀念衰落,代漢觀念崛起和袁氏"政在家門"私家思想的體現(xiàn)。第二節(jié)敘述袁術(shù)僭號之后的軍事行動。呂布和孫策的反叛打亂了袁術(shù)的戰(zhàn)略布局,徐州和蘄陽兩戰(zhàn)皆敗,袁術(shù)集團(tuán)由此迅速轉(zhuǎn)向衰亡。第三章著重論述袁術(shù)集團(tuán)瓦解及原因。袁術(shù)北上青州受阻后道死江亭,袁術(shù)集團(tuán)由此自我瓦解。第一節(jié)主要敘述袁術(shù)集團(tuán)瓦解后其內(nèi)部成員的走向。大致看來,其成員的歸宿基本上就是名士大族多仰天子之威歸順曹操,其他諸勢力多歸孫氏。在孫曹兩家之外,尚有袁術(shù)余部入山為寇,獨(dú)立于江淮之間,形成了孫曹之間的緩沖帶,使兩家可以平穩(wěn)發(fā)展。故袁術(shù)集團(tuán)瓦解客觀上促使了孫曹兩家的崛起。第二節(jié)補(bǔ)論袁術(shù)集團(tuán)瓦解原因。袁術(shù)集團(tuán)成分復(fù)雜,內(nèi)部傾軋嚴(yán)重,僭號分歧更加劇了各勢力之間的矛盾直接導(dǎo)致了孫策叛變。袁術(shù)集團(tuán)在軍政措施上有著嚴(yán)重的缺陷。不用質(zhì)任和世襲領(lǐng)兵使得袁術(shù)集團(tuán)飽受叛變之苦,臨時征糧使得袁術(shù)集團(tuán)多遭斷糧之難。袁術(shù)自身的隨意性和松散性使其自知其弊而不能改,最終導(dǎo)致集團(tuán)的瓦解敗亡,這是袁術(shù)性格的體現(xiàn)也是漢末弊政的延續(xù)。余論部分對袁術(shù)歷史形象進(jìn)行了重新審視。歷史上的袁術(shù)形象大致可以概括為"驕""奢""狂""肆"四點(diǎn)。這是袁術(shù)豪族型俠者身份的體現(xiàn),更是袁術(shù)身染東漢流弊的體現(xiàn)。可是袁術(shù)形象明顯被妖魔化了。袁術(shù)雖驕橫卻知禮節(jié),雖奢華卻未如所書之甚,雖狂傲卻一度忠保漢室。因史家偏見,歷史上的袁術(shù)廣受貶斥,這無疑是片面的。
[Abstract]:The Operation Group is an important warlord force active in the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty. The group has benefited from the reputation of the name and reputation of the co-operation, and is good at combining the forces of the parties, and is able to rise rapidly and have the power of not being small. It is the turning point of the rise and fall of the operation group, and the collapse of the operation group is the result of the advantages and disadvantages of the end of the Han Dynasty. The first chapter mainly discusses the formation and development of the Intraoperative Group. The first section briefly describes the background of the rise of the Intraoperative Group. In the case of the first meeting of the Eastern and Eastern Han Dynasty and the East Han Dynasty, the Group defeated the Dong's Group to win the victory of the new Jun in the six-year plan, and then fell into the conflict between the internal member of the Communist Party of China and the power of the Group. The two defeat of both the official and the foreign minister made this the rise of Dong Zhuo and Yuan Shao, who belong to He. Dong Zhuo sent Yuan Shao to Luoyang, and opened the prologue of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Section II describes the early activities of the Intraoperative Group. He went to Nanyang to resist Dong Zhuo, and the group began to form. It depends on the attachment of the old part of the tiger and the Sun Jian, and the operation group is like a broken bamboo, and the loss of Dong Zhuo. As Dong Zhuo's strategy contracted and moved to Chang 'an, the two were in the wrong direction. During the operation, Sun Jian------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The strategic center of the strategy turned to Xu Yang after the defeat of the alliance and the defeat of Cao Cao after the defeat of Cao Cao. In the second chapter, we focus on the problem of the number-of-the-art group. The first part is to analyze the background of the operation number of the cataract surgery. After the operation, Xu Yang, Chen Wen, drive Liu Bei, defeated Liu Bei, Lian Lu Bu, gather the bully, the palm of the eight, and the three state of Xu Yanyu in the heyday. The powerful and well-established military situation has allowed the Operation Group to have a number of capital. Cao Cao's invasion of the Republic of Henan into the state of Henan and the emperor of the emperor had given a heavy political pressure to the operation, which directly led to the policy of the Republic of China. relying on the support of the pro-trust and some of the dependent forces, the group was able to reach the opposition of the Great and the Sun, and adopted the policy of the number one. The number of the events is actually the reflection of the decline of the Han's idea in the last years of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the rise of the generation of the Han and the private thought of the "The government is in the house". Section II describes the military operations following the Operation of the Czech Republic. Lu Bu and Sun Ce's rebellion has upset the strategic layout of the operation, and both Xuzhou and Yang-yang have been defeated. The third chapter focuses on the collapse and the cause of the group. In the north of the operation, the Qing State was blocked from the death of the river, and the operation group collapsed. The first section mainly describes the trend of its internal members after the collapse of the Intraoperative Group. In general, the fate of its members is basically that of the great majority of the famous scholars, and the other forces are more than Sun's. In addition to Sun and Cao, there are still more than one operation in the mountain, which is independent of the Yangtze and the Huaihe River, forming a buffer zone between Sun and Cao, so that the two can develop smoothly. Therefore, the collapse of the operation group led to the rise of both Sun and Cao. The second section is the cause of the collapse of the operation group. The complex of the composition of the operation group and the serious internal rolling, the difference in the number of the other forces further aggravated the contradiction between the forces, which directly led to the defection of Sun Ce. The Group has a serious flaw in the military and political measures. No matter of quality and hereditary leader, the operation group has been suffering from a mutiny, and the temporary grain of grain has made it more difficult for the operation group to lose its food. The random and loose nature of the Chinese medicine's own self-knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages can not be changed, and finally, the collapse of the group is caused by the collapse of the group, which is the manifestation of the Chinese character and the continuation of the more and more harm in the end of the Han Dynasty. The remainder of the paper makes a reexamination of the image of the history of the Chinese medicine. The image of the image in history can be generally summarized as a kind of wild and wild type. "Four. This is a reflection of the identity of the royal-type Xia, and it is also a reflection of the advantages and disadvantages of the Han Dynasty. But the image of the operation was demonized by the demonic. Although the technique was not very good, it was not as good as the book, but the pride was once loyal to the Han's room. This is a one-sided, because of the prejudice of the history and the widespread and derogatory of the history.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K234.2
本文編號：2416021
[Abstract]:The Operation Group is an important warlord force active in the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty. The group has benefited from the reputation of the name and reputation of the co-operation, and is good at combining the forces of the parties, and is able to rise rapidly and have the power of not being small. It is the turning point of the rise and fall of the operation group, and the collapse of the operation group is the result of the advantages and disadvantages of the end of the Han Dynasty. The first chapter mainly discusses the formation and development of the Intraoperative Group. The first section briefly describes the background of the rise of the Intraoperative Group. In the case of the first meeting of the Eastern and Eastern Han Dynasty and the East Han Dynasty, the Group defeated the Dong's Group to win the victory of the new Jun in the six-year plan, and then fell into the conflict between the internal member of the Communist Party of China and the power of the Group. The two defeat of both the official and the foreign minister made this the rise of Dong Zhuo and Yuan Shao, who belong to He. Dong Zhuo sent Yuan Shao to Luoyang, and opened the prologue of the Eastern Han Dynasty. Section II describes the early activities of the Intraoperative Group. He went to Nanyang to resist Dong Zhuo, and the group began to form. It depends on the attachment of the old part of the tiger and the Sun Jian, and the operation group is like a broken bamboo, and the loss of Dong Zhuo. As Dong Zhuo's strategy contracted and moved to Chang 'an, the two were in the wrong direction. During the operation, Sun Jian------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The strategic center of the strategy turned to Xu Yang after the defeat of the alliance and the defeat of Cao Cao after the defeat of Cao Cao. In the second chapter, we focus on the problem of the number-of-the-art group. The first part is to analyze the background of the operation number of the cataract surgery. After the operation, Xu Yang, Chen Wen, drive Liu Bei, defeated Liu Bei, Lian Lu Bu, gather the bully, the palm of the eight, and the three state of Xu Yanyu in the heyday. The powerful and well-established military situation has allowed the Operation Group to have a number of capital. Cao Cao's invasion of the Republic of Henan into the state of Henan and the emperor of the emperor had given a heavy political pressure to the operation, which directly led to the policy of the Republic of China. relying on the support of the pro-trust and some of the dependent forces, the group was able to reach the opposition of the Great and the Sun, and adopted the policy of the number one. The number of the events is actually the reflection of the decline of the Han's idea in the last years of the Eastern Han Dynasty, the rise of the generation of the Han and the private thought of the "The government is in the house". Section II describes the military operations following the Operation of the Czech Republic. Lu Bu and Sun Ce's rebellion has upset the strategic layout of the operation, and both Xuzhou and Yang-yang have been defeated. The third chapter focuses on the collapse and the cause of the group. In the north of the operation, the Qing State was blocked from the death of the river, and the operation group collapsed. The first section mainly describes the trend of its internal members after the collapse of the Intraoperative Group. In general, the fate of its members is basically that of the great majority of the famous scholars, and the other forces are more than Sun's. In addition to Sun and Cao, there are still more than one operation in the mountain, which is independent of the Yangtze and the Huaihe River, forming a buffer zone between Sun and Cao, so that the two can develop smoothly. Therefore, the collapse of the operation group led to the rise of both Sun and Cao. The second section is the cause of the collapse of the operation group. The complex of the composition of the operation group and the serious internal rolling, the difference in the number of the other forces further aggravated the contradiction between the forces, which directly led to the defection of Sun Ce. The Group has a serious flaw in the military and political measures. No matter of quality and hereditary leader, the operation group has been suffering from a mutiny, and the temporary grain of grain has made it more difficult for the operation group to lose its food. The random and loose nature of the Chinese medicine's own self-knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages can not be changed, and finally, the collapse of the group is caused by the collapse of the group, which is the manifestation of the Chinese character and the continuation of the more and more harm in the end of the Han Dynasty. The remainder of the paper makes a reexamination of the image of the history of the Chinese medicine. The image of the image in history can be generally summarized as a kind of wild and wild type. "Four. This is a reflection of the identity of the royal-type Xia, and it is also a reflection of the advantages and disadvantages of the Han Dynasty. But the image of the operation was demonized by the demonic. Although the technique was not very good, it was not as good as the book, but the pride was once loyal to the Han's room. This is a one-sided, because of the prejudice of the history and the widespread and derogatory of the history.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K234.2
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 蘇杰;《三國志》校詁拾零(續(xù))[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2002年04期
2 崔泳準(zhǔn);關(guān)于《三國志》韓譯工作的思考[J];古籍整理研究學(xué)刊;2003年05期
3 高明;近二十年來國內(nèi)《三國志》詞語研究述評[J];西藏民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期
4 董廣偉;;《三國志》“德”命題論略[J];洛陽理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年04期
5 徐澄，，成純;《三國志》詞語札記[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;1996年01期
6 孫維梓;;外國幽默畫[J];父母必讀;1995年09期
7 章惠康;記述三國史的著名史籍——《三國志》述評[J];衡水師專學(xué)報(綜合版);2000年02期
8 李純蛟;《三國志》書法略論[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2001年06期
9 李玄玉;釋《三國志》的“□心”[J];連云港師范高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報;2002年03期
10 崔泳■,蘇杰;《三國志》重言詞略說[J];南京師范大學(xué)文學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 楊小平;;《三國志》校釋札記[A];中國訓(xùn)詁學(xué)研究會2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會論文摘要集[C];2010年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前8條
1 記者 王瑟;最早《三國志》手抄本存于新疆[N];光明日報;2014年
2 陳虎;總攬全局文質(zhì)辨洽的《三國志》[N];光明日報;2001年
3 徐宗文;小議《三國志》“裴注”的真實(shí)性[N];中華讀書報;2003年
4 傅光明;史亦小說？小說亦史？[N];中國郵政報;2005年
5 顏之江;古扶余人風(fēng)俗面面觀[N];吉林日報;2002年
6 吳金華;曹操是“寬宏大量的”嗎[N];文匯報;2007年
7 本報記者 易立權(quán);陳壽精神[N];南充日報;2010年
8 77296部隊(duì)政治委員 梅才華;由劉備失敗看感情與原則[N];解放軍報;2012年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條
1 何凌霞;《三國志》專名研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年
2 崔泳準(zhǔn);《三國志》今譯與古漢語專題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年
3 閻玉文;《三國志》復(fù)音詞專題研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2003年
4 肖瑜;《三國志》古寫本用字研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 董文雅;論諸葛亮形象的演變[D];渤海大學(xué);2015年
2 王雙嶺;吉川英治《三國志》研究[D];河南師范大學(xué);2015年
3 王凱旋;“《三國志》多回護(hù)”說辨析[D];西北師范大學(xué);2015年
4 譚金柳;“三國敘事”中的神話因素分析[D];湖北民族學(xué)院;2016年
5 李淼;《三國志》歷史書寫研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2015年
6 王媛媛;《三國志》及“裴注”疑問句研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2016年
7 王朝霞;《三國志》中的比較句研究[D];西南交通大學(xué);2017年
8 王越;漢末袁術(shù)集團(tuán)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2017年
9 陳紹唐;《三國志》關(guān)鍵人物評價辨疑[D];蘭州大學(xué);2007年
10 劉小姣;《三國志》戰(zhàn)爭描寫研究[D];西南大學(xué);2012年
本文編號：2416021
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2416021.html
