唐宋時期中原少數(shù)族裔行跡考述
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-24 10:44
【摘要】：唐宋時期在中國古代歷史上屬于一個特殊的階段，唐宋兩代各個方面的連續(xù)性明顯大于變革。表現(xiàn)在學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展上，乃由漢代的經(jīng)學(xué)注疏經(jīng)漢唐之際的過渡，到唐代的史學(xué)研究崛起。從這一角度來看，漢唐最大的差別在于學(xué)術(shù)研究重經(jīng)學(xué)還是史學(xué)。唐代史學(xué)承隋前的余續(xù)，官修盛行，至宋代達(dá)到高峰。政治上，魏晉南北朝為門閥貴族政治，唐代為門閥貴族政治向君主專制的過渡期，宋代則完成了君主專制。經(jīng)濟上唐代為莊園制向小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟的過渡期，宋代則確定了小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟。 從社會學(xué)角度看，唐宋時期中原內(nèi)地的少數(shù)族裔作為一個外來群體，與這里的華人有著本質(zhì)的區(qū)別，這種區(qū)別不僅表現(xiàn)在外貌、服裝和行為上，而且還深深的扎根于其內(nèi)心深處，表現(xiàn)為思維方式和審美情趣的巨大差異。兩者之間的關(guān)系，實質(zhì)上是唐宋時期乃至整個中國古代史上內(nèi)外地域沖突的外在表現(xiàn)之一。 這些外來人離開自己的族群，帶著異域不同的文化背景進(jìn)入中原，，對當(dāng)時華人社會方方面面的影響不容忽視，如果拋開其在文化傳播和交流中的作用不談，僅憑這一點，就足以說明對其進(jìn)行專門研究相當(dāng)必要。本文在理論上利用社會學(xué)相關(guān)原理，借鑒司馬光編《資治通鑒》所用的長編法梳理相關(guān)史料，從中原內(nèi)地的視角，對唐宋時期中原少數(shù)族裔這一外來群體的基本構(gòu)成進(jìn)行歷史社會學(xué)的研究。 正文分四章，加上序言構(gòu)成全文的五個部分。其中第一部分序言為一章；第二部分為政界人士，第三部分為商界人士，第四部分為文化界人士，最后部分為其他各界人士。 序言分四節(jié)。第一節(jié)為選題的依據(jù)和意義，第二節(jié)簡述研究現(xiàn)狀，分析前人研究成果和存在的問題，第三節(jié)研究方法和目標(biāo)。 正文按照職業(yè)身份對搜集的唐宋時期中原少數(shù)族裔的資料進(jìn)行分類，通過政界人士、商界人士、文化界人士和其它各界人士等四個部分介紹這一部分人的群體構(gòu)成及其在中原的事跡或行為，進(jìn)而探討這一特殊群體在唐宋演變過程中的地位及其對民族融合的影響。
[Abstract]:The Tang and Song dynasties belong to a special stage in the ancient history of China. The continuity of each aspect of the Tang and Song dynasties is obviously greater than the change. In academic development, it is from the transition between Han Dynasty and Tang Dynasty, to the rise of historical research in Tang Dynasty. From this point of view, the biggest difference between Han and Tang dynasties is that academic research emphasizes classics or historiography. Tang Dynasty historiography continued before the Sui Dynasty, official repair prevalence, to the Song Dynasty reached a peak. Politically, the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties were the aristocratic politics, the Tang Dynasty was the monarchy, and the Song Dynasty was the autocratic monarchy. Economically, the Tang Dynasty was the transition period from manor system to small-scale peasant economy, while the Song Dynasty determined the small-scale peasant economy. From a sociological point of view, the ethnic minorities of the Central Plains in the Tang and Song dynasties, as an alien group, are fundamentally different from the Chinese here. This distinction is not only manifested in appearance, clothing and behavior. But also deeply rooted in its heart, manifested in the way of thinking and aesthetic taste huge difference. The relationship between the two is essentially one of the external manifestations of internal and external regional conflicts in the Tang and Song dynasties and in the whole ancient history of China. These foreigners left their own ethnic groups and entered the Central Plains with different cultural backgrounds. The impact on all aspects of Chinese society at that time could not be ignored. If we put aside their role in cultural communication and exchange, we can only rely on this point. It is enough to show that its special research is quite necessary. Based on the theory of sociology and the long compiling method used by Si Maguang, this paper combs the relevant historical materials from the perspective of the interior of the Central Plains. This paper makes a historical sociological study on the basic composition of the ethnic minorities in the Central Plains during the Tang and Song dynasties. The text is divided into four chapters, plus the preface to constitute the full text of the five parts. The first part is a preface, the second part is a politician, the third part is a business person, the fourth part is a cultural personage, and the last part is a person from other circles. The preamble is divided into four sections. The first section is the basis and significance of the topic, the second section briefly describes the status of research, analysis of previous research results and existing problems, the third section of the research methods and objectives. According to their professional status, the text classifies the collected data on ethnic minorities in the Central Plains during the Tang and Song dynasties, through politicians and businessmen. Four parts, such as cultural personage and other people from all walks of life, introduce the composition of the group and their deeds or behaviors in the Central Plains, and then discuss the position of this special group in the evolution of the Tang and Song dynasties and its influence on the national integration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：K242;K244
本文編號：2200565
[Abstract]:The Tang and Song dynasties belong to a special stage in the ancient history of China. The continuity of each aspect of the Tang and Song dynasties is obviously greater than the change. In academic development, it is from the transition between Han Dynasty and Tang Dynasty, to the rise of historical research in Tang Dynasty. From this point of view, the biggest difference between Han and Tang dynasties is that academic research emphasizes classics or historiography. Tang Dynasty historiography continued before the Sui Dynasty, official repair prevalence, to the Song Dynasty reached a peak. Politically, the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern dynasties were the aristocratic politics, the Tang Dynasty was the monarchy, and the Song Dynasty was the autocratic monarchy. Economically, the Tang Dynasty was the transition period from manor system to small-scale peasant economy, while the Song Dynasty determined the small-scale peasant economy. From a sociological point of view, the ethnic minorities of the Central Plains in the Tang and Song dynasties, as an alien group, are fundamentally different from the Chinese here. This distinction is not only manifested in appearance, clothing and behavior. But also deeply rooted in its heart, manifested in the way of thinking and aesthetic taste huge difference. The relationship between the two is essentially one of the external manifestations of internal and external regional conflicts in the Tang and Song dynasties and in the whole ancient history of China. These foreigners left their own ethnic groups and entered the Central Plains with different cultural backgrounds. The impact on all aspects of Chinese society at that time could not be ignored. If we put aside their role in cultural communication and exchange, we can only rely on this point. It is enough to show that its special research is quite necessary. Based on the theory of sociology and the long compiling method used by Si Maguang, this paper combs the relevant historical materials from the perspective of the interior of the Central Plains. This paper makes a historical sociological study on the basic composition of the ethnic minorities in the Central Plains during the Tang and Song dynasties. The text is divided into four chapters, plus the preface to constitute the full text of the five parts. The first part is a preface, the second part is a politician, the third part is a business person, the fourth part is a cultural personage, and the last part is a person from other circles. The preamble is divided into four sections. The first section is the basis and significance of the topic, the second section briefly describes the status of research, analysis of previous research results and existing problems, the third section of the research methods and objectives. According to their professional status, the text classifies the collected data on ethnic minorities in the Central Plains during the Tang and Song dynasties, through politicians and businessmen. Four parts, such as cultural personage and other people from all walks of life, introduce the composition of the group and their deeds or behaviors in the Central Plains, and then discuss the position of this special group in the evolution of the Tang and Song dynasties and its influence on the national integration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：K242;K244
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 湯勤福，傅永聚;唐代的民族混血及其社會功能[J];北方論叢;1994年03期
2 徐嚴(yán)華;唐代商人研究綜述[J];鄂州大學(xué)學(xué)報;2003年02期
3 鄭元瓏;隋唐時代黠戛斯部與中原王朝關(guān)系初探[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年04期
4 李遇春;;新疆烏恰縣發(fā)現(xiàn)金條和大批波斯銀幣[J];考古;1959年09期
5 孫莉;;薩珊銀幣在中國的分布及其功能[J];考古學(xué)報;2004年01期
6 陳杰;“僚”名的讀音與棄用[J];廣西民族研究;2002年03期
7 陳曉婧;;淺析中華民族多元一體格局中的民族認(rèn)同[J];廣西民族研究;2005年04期
8 陶玉坤,薄音湖;北宋對契丹歸明人的政策[J];內(nèi)蒙古社會科學(xué)(漢文版);2003年06期
9 顧吉辰;西夏歸宋酋豪劉延慶的幾個問題[J];寧夏社會科學(xué);1989年04期
10 宋杰;三代中國的經(jīng)濟區(qū)劃、政治格局與國家防御戰(zhàn)略[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1995年02期
本文編號：2200565
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2200565.html
