本文選題：歷史進(jìn)程 + 時(shí)段�。� 參考：《思想戰(zhàn)線》2017年06期

【摘要】：正關(guān)于中古中后期的歷史進(jìn)程,唐宋變革論和中國社會(huì)長期停滯說無疑是重要的參考體系。他們?cè)趯W(xué)界引起了廣泛爭議與不斷反思,而其論辯的焦點(diǎn)在于:宋以后的中國社會(huì),是有新的發(fā)展或變革,還是持續(xù)停滯或階段性中斷?若以前者為特征,又以哪一時(shí)段、何種內(nèi)涵為標(biāo)志?從近年來的討論來看,學(xué)者們大多傾向于唐宋以后仍有新的發(fā)展或變革,其中有五種論說尤為值得矚目。
[Abstract]:As for the historical process in the middle and late period of middle and late ancient times, the theory of transformation in Tang and Song dynasties and the theory of secular stagnation in Chinese society are undoubtedly important reference systems. They have caused extensive controversy and continuous reflection in the academic circles, and the focus of their arguments is: is there a new development or change in the Chinese society after the Song Dynasty, or does it continue to stagnate or stagnate? If it is characterized by the former, what period of time and what kind of connotation is the symbol? From the discussion in recent years, most scholars tend to have new development or change after Tang and Song dynasties, five of which are especially noteworthy.
【作者單位】： 云南大學(xué);云南大學(xué)中國經(jīng)濟(jì)史研究所;
【分類號(hào)】：K244;K247

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 王大華;漢唐歷史進(jìn)程相似原因初探[J];陜西師大學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1984年04期

2 鄖在廷;;論西漢思想政治教育模式形成的歷史進(jìn)程[J];北京印刷學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2101979