潮汕鐵路案中的地方應對
發(fā)布時間：2019-03-20 07:03
【摘要】：僑資潮汕鐵路既有日本資本介入,又牽扯土客矛盾。導致數(shù)名日本人斃命的葫蘆市事件發(fā)生后,廣東地方官基于潮汕鐵路公司系華資企業(yè),有清晰民事行為主體,頂住商部和日本領事的壓力,堅持將懲兇與賠償分開的處理原則。在晚清特殊外交體制背景下,這一案例顯現(xiàn)了對外交涉中"大權在外"的特性,也顯現(xiàn)非建制的地方對外交涉機構的運作程序。受此次事件的影響,日本對潮汕鐵路的控制逐步受到削弱。廣東地方官相應強化了對民營鐵路公司的管控,進一步協(xié)調(diào)其與地方民眾的關系,在地價問題上維護當?shù)孛癖姷睦�、在路線設置上兼顧民眾與鐵路公司的利益。受清末商辦體制的影響,地方政府在潮汕鐵路興建與否的問題上,并不居于主導地位,只是出現(xiàn)糾紛時,才啟動地方外交交涉機制�；诘胤嚼娴目剂�,針對日本在潮汕鐵路中人員和資本的隱蔽性,拒絕將此事件作為中日之間的外交事務來處理,其理由在于日本領事并沒有代表鐵路公司與中國政府進行交涉的權力。地方督撫與商部在民營公司管理上溝通不暢,以及這條鐵路所面臨的潮汕地方復雜的土客矛盾,都是潮汕鐵路"命運不濟"的背景。
[Abstract]:Overseas Chinese-funded Chaoshan Railway not only has Japanese capital intervention, but also involves local contradictions. After the Huludi incident, which killed several Japanese people, Guangdong local officials insisted on the principle of separating punishment from compensation on the basis of Chaoshan Railway Company, a Chinese-funded enterprise, with a clear subject of civil conduct, withholding pressure from the Ministry of Commerce and the Japanese consul. Under the background of the special diplomatic system in the late Qing Dynasty, this case shows the characteristics of "big power outside" in the foreign negotiation, and also shows the operation procedure of the non-establishment local foreign negotiation institution. Affected by this incident, Japan's control of the Chaoshan Railway has been gradually weakened. Accordingly, the local officials in Guangdong strengthened the control over the private railway companies, further coordinated their relations with the local people, safeguarded the interests of the local people on the issue of land price, and took into account the interests of the people and the railway companies in the setting up of the routes. Under the influence of the commercial office system in the late Qing Dynasty, the local government did not play a dominant role in the construction of the Chaoshan Railway, but only when disputes arose, the local diplomatic negotiation mechanism was initiated. Based on the consideration of local interests, in view of the concealment of Japanese personnel and capital in the Chaoshan Railway, the incident was refused to be dealt with as a foreign affairs between China and Japan. The reason is that the Japanese consul does not have the power to negotiate with the Chinese government on behalf of the railway company. The lack of communication between the local governor and the Ministry of Commerce in the management of private companies, as well as the complicated conflicts between local tourists and local residents in Chaozhou-Shantou, which this railway faces, are the background of the "fate" of the Chaozhou-Shantou railway.
【作者單位】： 安徽師范大學經(jīng)濟管理學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金項目(13BZS057)
【分類號】：K252
本文編號：2443972
[Abstract]:Overseas Chinese-funded Chaoshan Railway not only has Japanese capital intervention, but also involves local contradictions. After the Huludi incident, which killed several Japanese people, Guangdong local officials insisted on the principle of separating punishment from compensation on the basis of Chaoshan Railway Company, a Chinese-funded enterprise, with a clear subject of civil conduct, withholding pressure from the Ministry of Commerce and the Japanese consul. Under the background of the special diplomatic system in the late Qing Dynasty, this case shows the characteristics of "big power outside" in the foreign negotiation, and also shows the operation procedure of the non-establishment local foreign negotiation institution. Affected by this incident, Japan's control of the Chaoshan Railway has been gradually weakened. Accordingly, the local officials in Guangdong strengthened the control over the private railway companies, further coordinated their relations with the local people, safeguarded the interests of the local people on the issue of land price, and took into account the interests of the people and the railway companies in the setting up of the routes. Under the influence of the commercial office system in the late Qing Dynasty, the local government did not play a dominant role in the construction of the Chaoshan Railway, but only when disputes arose, the local diplomatic negotiation mechanism was initiated. Based on the consideration of local interests, in view of the concealment of Japanese personnel and capital in the Chaoshan Railway, the incident was refused to be dealt with as a foreign affairs between China and Japan. The reason is that the Japanese consul does not have the power to negotiate with the Chinese government on behalf of the railway company. The lack of communication between the local governor and the Ministry of Commerce in the management of private companies, as well as the complicated conflicts between local tourists and local residents in Chaozhou-Shantou, which this railway faces, are the background of the "fate" of the Chaozhou-Shantou railway.
【作者單位】： 安徽師范大學經(jīng)濟管理學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金項目(13BZS057)
【分類號】：K252
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前2條
1 陳海忠;;從民利到國權:論1904-1909年的潮汕鐵路風波[J];太平洋學報;2008年10期
2 魏明樞;晚清時期客家華僑在國內(nèi)的經(jīng)濟投資[J];史學月刊;2003年06期
，本文編號：2443972
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2443972.html
