清季新世紀派無政府主義思想研究
發(fā)布時間：2019-01-05 17:57
【摘要】：新世紀派是清季宣傳無政府主義思想的重要派別,因創(chuàng)辦《新世紀》周刊而得名,它與同時期的天義派并列為中國早期無政府主義思想的兩大派別。文章主要以1907年張靜江、吳稚暉、李石曾、褚民誼等人在法國巴黎創(chuàng)辦的《新世紀》周刊為研究素材,試圖通過《新世紀》周刊探究新世紀派無政府主義思想的真實面目,進而揭示清季革命思潮中激進的一面。在清季的革命浪潮中,革命陣營中的不同派別出于不同的思想理念就中國的革命問題產(chǎn)生了分歧。留學歐洲的張靜江、吳稚暉、李石曾、褚民誼等人由于受西方無政府主義思潮的影響,逐漸地走上無政府主義革命的道路。在《新世紀》周刊上,他們系統(tǒng)地闡釋了無政府主義思想,認為無政府主義不僅可能,同時也是歷史發(fā)展的必然。出于理念的不同,新世紀派同立憲派與革命派展開論爭,一方面,他們猛烈地批判康梁領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的立憲活動,另一方面,他們斷言同盟會所領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的革命非真正意義上的革命,真正的革命應(yīng)該是為實現(xiàn)社會多數(shù)幸福的無政府主義社會革命。文章正文共三章。第一章集中論述新世紀派無政府主義思想的確立,自1902年張靜江、李石曾赴法后,褚民誼、吳稚暉等人相繼西行,在法國他們接受了西方的無政府主義思想,進而創(chuàng)辦《新世紀》周刊以宣揚之,形成了以宣揚無政府主義思想的新世紀派。但就思想淵源而言,他們更多的承接巴苦寧和克魯泡特金的無政府主義思想。第二章則著重考察新世紀派無政府主義思想的主要內(nèi)容,新世紀派以推翻強權(quán)為職志,倡導(dǎo)通過無政府主義社會革命推翻政治強權(quán)、經(jīng)濟強權(quán)和社會強權(quán)。第三章為新世紀派無政府主義思想同清季思想論爭。他們對于當時如火如荼的立憲活動以及革命活動都作出了回應(yīng),他們不僅猛烈地批判了清朝和清季立憲活動,而且對革命派的種族革命理念也進行了抨擊,不同的是即使他們同革命派存在諸多分歧,在實際上他們?nèi)越o予革命派以諸多支持,為維護革命團體的團結(jié)作出了貢獻。
[Abstract]:The New Century School is an important faction in the Qing Dynasty to propagate anarchism thought. It is named for the establishment of the New Century Weekly. It is parallel with the Tianyi School of the same period as the two major schools of anarchist thought in the early period of China. The article mainly takes the weekly "New Century", which was founded by Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi in Paris in 1907, as the research material, and attempts to explore the true face of the anarchism thought of the new century school through the "New Century" Weekly. And then reveal the radical side of the revolutionary trend of thought in Qing Dynasty. In the revolutionary wave of Qing Dynasty, different factions in the revolutionary camp had different ideas about China's revolution. Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi, who studied in Europe, gradually embarked on the road of anarchist revolution because of the influence of western anarchism. In New Century Weekly they systematically explained anarchism thought that anarchism is not only possible but also a necessity of historical development. Because of the difference of ideas, the new century school argued with the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries. On the one hand, they vehemently criticized Kang Liang's constitutionalism activities; on the other hand, they asserted that the revolution led by the Alliance was not a revolution in the true sense. The real revolution should be an anarchist social revolution for most of society's happiness. The text of the article consists of three chapters. The first chapter focuses on the establishment of anarchism in the new century. After Zhang Jingjiang and Li Shi went to France in 1902, Chu Minyi, Wu Zhihui and others went westward one after another, and in France they accepted the western anarchist thought. Then the New Century Weekly was founded to promote it and formed the New Century School to promote anarchism. But as far as their ideological origin is concerned, they carry on the anarchism of Barkunin and Krobutekin. The second chapter focuses on the main contents of the anarchism of the new century. The new century advocates overthrowing the political, economic and social power through the anarchist social revolution. The third chapter is the controversy between the anarchism of the New Century and the Qing Dynasty. They responded to the constitutional activities and revolutionary activities in full swing at that time. They not only severely criticized the activities of the Qing Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty, but also attacked the revolutionaries' ideas of racial revolution. The difference is that, even though they have many differences with the revolutionaries, they still give the revolutionaries a lot of support and contribute to the unity of the revolutionary groups.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：K252;B25
本文編號：2402113
[Abstract]:The New Century School is an important faction in the Qing Dynasty to propagate anarchism thought. It is named for the establishment of the New Century Weekly. It is parallel with the Tianyi School of the same period as the two major schools of anarchist thought in the early period of China. The article mainly takes the weekly "New Century", which was founded by Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi in Paris in 1907, as the research material, and attempts to explore the true face of the anarchism thought of the new century school through the "New Century" Weekly. And then reveal the radical side of the revolutionary trend of thought in Qing Dynasty. In the revolutionary wave of Qing Dynasty, different factions in the revolutionary camp had different ideas about China's revolution. Zhang Jingjiang, Wu Zhihui, Li Shi and Chu Minyi, who studied in Europe, gradually embarked on the road of anarchist revolution because of the influence of western anarchism. In New Century Weekly they systematically explained anarchism thought that anarchism is not only possible but also a necessity of historical development. Because of the difference of ideas, the new century school argued with the constitutionalists and the revolutionaries. On the one hand, they vehemently criticized Kang Liang's constitutionalism activities; on the other hand, they asserted that the revolution led by the Alliance was not a revolution in the true sense. The real revolution should be an anarchist social revolution for most of society's happiness. The text of the article consists of three chapters. The first chapter focuses on the establishment of anarchism in the new century. After Zhang Jingjiang and Li Shi went to France in 1902, Chu Minyi, Wu Zhihui and others went westward one after another, and in France they accepted the western anarchist thought. Then the New Century Weekly was founded to promote it and formed the New Century School to promote anarchism. But as far as their ideological origin is concerned, they carry on the anarchism of Barkunin and Krobutekin. The second chapter focuses on the main contents of the anarchism of the new century. The new century advocates overthrowing the political, economic and social power through the anarchist social revolution. The third chapter is the controversy between the anarchism of the New Century and the Qing Dynasty. They responded to the constitutional activities and revolutionary activities in full swing at that time. They not only severely criticized the activities of the Qing Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty, but also attacked the revolutionaries' ideas of racial revolution. The difference is that, even though they have many differences with the revolutionaries, they still give the revolutionaries a lot of support and contribute to the unity of the revolutionary groups.
【學位授予單位】：鄭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2016
【分類號】：K252;B25
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條
1 蔣俊;“新世紀派”思想研究[J];文史哲;1991年02期
2 吳浪波;互助論在清末的傳播與影響[J];中州學刊;2005年02期
3 ;[J];;年期
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 石威;清季新世紀派無政府主義思想研究[D];鄭州大學;2016年
，本文編號：2402113
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2402113.html
