發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-16 12:32

【摘要】：中國傳統(tǒng)學(xué)術(shù)發(fā)展到清代,進(jìn)入整理和總結(jié)的重要時(shí)期。而作為官方哲學(xué)的經(jīng)學(xué)也在此時(shí)發(fā)展到鼎盛,影響著清代以至近代社會(huì)的政治、教育、文化等各個(gè)方面。據(jù)粗略統(tǒng)計(jì),有清一代,經(jīng)學(xué)研究學(xué)者超過一千人,經(jīng)學(xué)相關(guān)著作達(dá)萬余種之多,可謂卷帙浩繁、汗牛充棟。但在學(xué)術(shù)界,目前還缺少編年體的清代經(jīng)學(xué)研究著作,尤其是系統(tǒng)的清代經(jīng)學(xué)著作成書年代的考證還是一個(gè)空白。 本文以考證清代經(jīng)學(xué)著作的成書年代為重點(diǎn),立足于文獻(xiàn)學(xué)的基本研究方法,于浩如煙海的清代史籍和今人著述中,梳理出清代經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)成書年代的相關(guān)信息,按年系書事,依書編排,每一條目先系年月,次述成書情況,次引立論依據(jù)及文獻(xiàn)出處,最后介紹作者并作相關(guān)說明和考證。 本系列論文《清代經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)系年考》主要考證成書于有清一代(公元1644-1911年)的經(jīng)學(xué)著作。依清帝年號(hào)分為四個(gè)階段、四個(gè)部分：順治康熙時(shí)期(1644-1722年),雍正乾隆時(shí)期(1723-1795年),嘉慶道光時(shí)期(1796-1850年),咸豐同治光緒宣統(tǒng)時(shí)期(1851-1911年)。本文是此系列論文的第四階段：咸豐同治光緒宣統(tǒng)時(shí)期(1851-1911年),分為緒論、凡例、正文和余論四部分。第一部分綜述此階段經(jīng)學(xué)研究的現(xiàn)狀和研究的方法。第二部分簡述系年所依據(jù)的原則及標(biāo)準(zhǔn)：以年代為經(jīng),以著作為緯。第三部分從清代史籍和近人在此方面的著述中,梳理出有關(guān)咸同光宣時(shí)期經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)成書年代的相關(guān)信息,然后將之系在不同的年份下。第四部分在系年的基礎(chǔ)上對此階段經(jīng)學(xué)發(fā)展概況和特點(diǎn)作出簡單概括,歸結(jié)出此階段經(jīng)學(xué)在繼乾嘉昌盛局面之后表現(xiàn)出新的特點(diǎn),同時(shí)也取得了令人矚目的成就。 總之,本文秉承文獻(xiàn)學(xué)“辨章學(xué)術(shù)、考鏡源流”的學(xué)術(shù)宗旨,對清代咸同光宣時(shí)期經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)的成書年代第一次進(jìn)行了深入而系統(tǒng)的考證,并按照成書年代進(jìn)行了排序；其次,傳統(tǒng)的學(xué)術(shù)史往往以最重要人物、著作、思想及學(xué)派為研究對象,缺乏對次要人物與著作的關(guān)注,本文第一次對此時(shí)期的經(jīng)學(xué)家及其著作進(jìn)行了清理和考證,基本勾勒出清代經(jīng)解文獻(xiàn)的發(fā)展全貌。這也是本文的特色和創(chuàng)新之處。
[Abstract]:Chinese traditional academic development to the Qing Dynasty, into an important period of collation and summary. As an official philosophy, the Confucian classics also developed to the peak at this time, which influenced the politics, education, culture and other aspects of the Qing Dynasty and modern society. According to rough statistics, there were more than 1,000 scholars in the Qing Dynasty, and more than ten thousand related works of Confucian classics, which could be described as voluminous and abundant. However, in academic circles, there is still a lack of chronological studies of the Qing Dynasty, especially the systematic textual research of the Qing Dynasty. Based on the basic research methods of philology, and in the vast historical books of the Qing Dynasty and in the writings of present people, this paper, focusing on the textual research on the age of the books of the classics of the Qing Dynasty, sorts out the relevant information of the time when the documents of the classics of the Qing Dynasty were written, and then it is a matter of the book according to the year. According to the book arrangement, each entry is the first year and month, then describes the situation of the book, the basis of the secondary citation theory and the source of the literature, and finally introduces the author and makes relevant explanations and textual research. In this series of papers, the Department of Classical interpretation of the Qing Dynasty, the main textual research in the Qing Dynasty (AD 1644-1911) of the classics works. According to the title of Emperor Qing Dynasty, it is divided into four parts: Shunzhi Kangxi period (1644-1722), Yongzheng Qianlong period (1723-1795), Jiaqing Daoguang period (1796-1850), Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuanzhong period (1851-1911). This paper is the fourth stage of this series of papers: Xianfeng Tongzhi Guang Xu Xuantong period (1851-1911), divided into four parts: introduction, examples, the text and the rest. The first part summarizes the current situation and research methods of the study of Confucian classics in this stage. The second part briefly describes the principles and criteria on which the year is based: the year as the meridian and the book as the latitude. In the third part, from the historical books of Qing Dynasty and the works of modern people in this respect, the author sorts out the relevant information about the literature of Xiantong Guangxuan period, and then puts it in different years. The fourth part makes a brief summary of the development and characteristics of Confucian classics in this stage on the basis of the years, and concludes that the Confucian classics in this stage showed new characteristics after the prosperity of Qianjia and made remarkable achievements at the same time. In a word, this paper, in keeping with the academic purpose of philology, "the study of chapter differentiation, examination of the source of mirror", makes a deep and systematic textual research on the first time of the writing of the classics in the period of salt and light propaganda in the Qing Dynasty, and makes a ranking according to the time of the completion of the book. Secondly, the traditional academic history often takes the most important person, the work, the thought and the school as the research object, lacks to pay attention to the secondary figure and the work, this article has carried on the clean up and the textual research to this period economist and its work for the first time, Basic outline of the Qing Dynasty, the development of the literature. This is also the characteristics and innovation of this article.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：B234;K252

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 黃開國;廖平經(jīng)學(xué)六變時(shí)間略考[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年01期

2 姜鈞;梁啟超與孔學(xué)[J];孔子研究;1986年02期

3 趙振鐸;;從《周禮正義》看孫詒讓對《集韻》的研究[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

4 朱淑君;戴望經(jīng)學(xué)述論[J];首都師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年S3期

5 魯錦寰;;科學(xué)與人文融會(huì)的傳統(tǒng)——讀楊小明《清代浙東學(xué)派與科學(xué)》[J];史學(xué)月刊;2006年02期

6 楊洪升;;繆荃孫著述新考[J];圖書館雜志;2008年05期

7 劉墨;;王國維的經(jīng)學(xué)研究[J];徐州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

8 梅新林;俞樟華;;浙東學(xué)派編年史的學(xué)術(shù)創(chuàng)意與構(gòu)想[J];浙江師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

9 陳國慶,曾謙;章炳麟傳統(tǒng)學(xué)術(shù)研究的成就[J];中州學(xué)刊;2003年02期

10 任劍濤;經(jīng)典解讀中的原創(chuàng)思想負(fù)載——從《孟子字義疏證》與《孟子微》看[J];中國哲學(xué)史;2002年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 史振卿;清代《尚書》學(xué)若干問題研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2011年

2 朱華忠;清代《論語》簡論[D];華中師范大學(xué);2002年

3 趙慶偉;清代孟學(xué)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2002年

4 柳宏;清代《論語》詮釋史論[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2004年

5 何海燕;清代《詩經(jīng)》學(xué)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

6 文廷海;清代春秋谷梁學(xué)研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2005年

7 王應(yīng)憲;清代吳派學(xué)術(shù)研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2007年

8 房瑞麗;清代三家《詩》研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年

9 劉宗棠;清代《左傳》文獻(xiàn)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

10 彭喜雙;《爾雅》文獻(xiàn)研究[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 馬瑜;俞樾《詩經(jīng)》研究的成就及影響[D];山西大學(xué);2006年

2 趙景雪;清代《孝經(jīng)》文獻(xiàn)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2007年

3 吳保森;郭嵩燾三《質(zhì)疑》研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2335528