晚清優(yōu)拔貢考試與山東巡撫袁樹勛聯(lián)銜入奏——關(guān)曉紅《科舉停廢與近代中國(guó)社會(huì)》補(bǔ)正
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-11-15 11:18
【摘要】:正關(guān)曉紅教授《科舉停廢與近代中國(guó)社會(huì)》第三章停罷科舉的善后措施里,對(duì)山東巡撫袁樹勛電邀各省聯(lián)銜奏請(qǐng)停止優(yōu)拔貢一事,做了認(rèn)真的評(píng)述[1]。我認(rèn)為,關(guān)曉紅教授的分析,對(duì)山東巡撫袁樹勛電邀各省聯(lián)銜奏請(qǐng)停止優(yōu)拔貢一事涉及的一些問題未充分廓清,尚有可議之處。本文擬利用相關(guān)檔案文獻(xiàn)資料,對(duì)這一史事略做補(bǔ)正,以期對(duì)晚清內(nèi)外群臣在優(yōu)拔貢考試停留問題上的態(tài)度和反應(yīng)有一個(gè)更加全面的認(rèn)識(shí)。宣統(tǒng)元年(1909)三月,在第二次舉行舉貢考職和
[Abstract]:Professor Zheng Guan Xiaohong, "the abolition of the imperial examination and the modern Chinese society" in the third chapter of the measures to stop the imperial examination, the Shandong governor Yuan Shuxun invited the provinces to play the title of the United title to stop the excellent tribute, made a serious comment [1]. In my opinion, Professor Guan Xiaohong's analysis has not fully clarified some problems involved in the invitation by Yuan Shuxun, governor of Shandong Province, to stop the United title of each province, and there is still room for discussion. This paper intends to make use of the relevant archival documents to make a brief correction to this historical event in order to have a more comprehensive understanding of the attitude and reaction of the officials from both inside and outside the late Qing Dynasty on the question of the retention of the excellent Pagons examination. In the first year of the first year (1909), the examination was held for the second time
【作者單位】: 四川大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:K25
本文編號(hào):2333168
[Abstract]:Professor Zheng Guan Xiaohong, "the abolition of the imperial examination and the modern Chinese society" in the third chapter of the measures to stop the imperial examination, the Shandong governor Yuan Shuxun invited the provinces to play the title of the United title to stop the excellent tribute, made a serious comment [1]. In my opinion, Professor Guan Xiaohong's analysis has not fully clarified some problems involved in the invitation by Yuan Shuxun, governor of Shandong Province, to stop the United title of each province, and there is still room for discussion. This paper intends to make use of the relevant archival documents to make a brief correction to this historical event in order to have a more comprehensive understanding of the attitude and reaction of the officials from both inside and outside the late Qing Dynasty on the question of the retention of the excellent Pagons examination. In the first year of the first year (1909), the examination was held for the second time
【作者單位】: 四川大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】:K25
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條
1 康化夷;;袁樹勛與“蘇報(bào)案”[J];湖南科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年03期
2 楊秀云;;袁樹勛應(yīng)對(duì)上海公堂案述評(píng)[J];佳木斯大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2013年04期
3 李育民;楊秀云;;中俄“周生有案”交涉[J];史學(xué)月刊;2011年08期
4 ;[J];;年期
,本文編號(hào):2333168
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2333168.html
教材專著