對(duì)于天津教案起因的考察
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-11-06 21:16
【摘要】：1870年爆發(fā)的天津教案是晚清教案史上非常重要的一個(gè)事件,其原因也是史學(xué)界研究較多的一個(gè)問(wèn)題。天津教案牽扯到包括西方在華官員、西方在華傳教士、中國(guó)官員、地方勢(shì)力、普通民眾等社會(huì)各種勢(shì)力階層,是各方因素糾纏在一起同時(shí)爆發(fā)的結(jié)果。要理清它背后的種種原因,就必須站在一個(gè)合適的立足點(diǎn)分析涉案的各方利益,將導(dǎo)致沖突的不同層次因素按照主次輕重梳順。 本文將時(shí)間和空間兩個(gè)維度相結(jié)合,研究視角逐漸拉近：第一部分介紹天津教案發(fā)生的背景因素,即中外文化差異。站在歷史的大背景下考察中外交往,其實(shí)文化差異導(dǎo)致沖突的情況幾千年來(lái)一直存在。早期的佛教和伊斯蘭教最初傳入中國(guó)時(shí),也經(jīng)歷了與本土文化相互碰撞、了解、融合乃至同化的過(guò)程�；浇淘诿鞒跗谡絺魅胫袊�(guó)時(shí)也與中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化發(fā)生沖突,但是無(wú)論從數(shù)量上還是程度上考察,都無(wú)法與晚清教案相提并論,有些沖突甚至不能算作是教案,而是關(guān)于文化的論戰(zhàn)。所以,筆者認(rèn)為中西方文化差異并不一定導(dǎo)致教案的發(fā)生,但是教案發(fā)生的背后必定有文化差異的因素存在,在本文中筆者將其作為教案的背景因素考察。 本文的第二部分將視角拉近到晚清時(shí)期,從1840年鴉片戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)開(kāi)始,西方資本主義國(guó)家開(kāi)始用炮艦政策對(duì)中國(guó)進(jìn)行侵略,筆者認(rèn)為這是晚清大部分教案發(fā)生的根本原因,也包括天津教案。在對(duì)天津教案的分析中我們不難看出此次的教案并不是盲目針對(duì)所有西方國(guó)家,當(dāng)時(shí)的組織者和大部分民眾將法國(guó)天主教傳教士和修女作為發(fā)泄憤怒的主要對(duì)象。因此除了對(duì)晚清時(shí)期西方國(guó)家在華傳教過(guò)程中的侵略行為進(jìn)行分析外,筆者還將對(duì)19世紀(jì)法國(guó)的對(duì)華傳教政策及其背景進(jìn)行回顧。法國(guó)被稱(chēng)為“天主教的長(zhǎng)女”,歷史上一直是天主教教區(qū)的重要國(guó)家。在基督教在華傳播的早期,法國(guó)取得了諸多利益。大革命之后,法國(guó)失去了在歐洲大陸的傳統(tǒng)優(yōu)勢(shì),傳教的腳步也明顯放慢。1840年中英鴉片戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)之后,英、美、德等西方列強(qiáng)陸續(xù)通過(guò)炮艦政策進(jìn)入中國(guó),通過(guò)一系列不平等條約攫取了諸多利益。法國(guó)覬覦他們的成果,同時(shí)更擔(dān)心如果自己不參與這次對(duì)遠(yuǎn)東的侵略,將喪失重新成為一流強(qiáng)國(guó)的機(jī)會(huì),使自己與別國(guó)的差距更大。但是當(dāng)時(shí)的法國(guó)在華貿(mào)易份額十分有限,條件優(yōu)惠的通商條約對(duì)于法國(guó)的意義遠(yuǎn)不如對(duì)英美等國(guó)那么大,所以法國(guó)的政策是加強(qiáng)對(duì)中國(guó)的傳教政策,通過(guò)思想的滲透獲得在華利益。 在第三部分,筆者將視角拉近到晚清時(shí)期的天津城。雖然晚清的諸多教案都與文化的差異、西方列強(qiáng)的侵略有關(guān),但是每個(gè)教案最直接的導(dǎo)致原因各不相同,筆者認(rèn)為天津教案中,關(guān)于法國(guó)天主教的一系列社會(huì)傳聞是其發(fā)生的直接原因。對(duì)于這些傳聞的辨?zhèn)闻c分析,能讓我們?cè)趯?duì)天津教案有更深入的理解。
[Abstract]:The teaching case of Tianjin broke out in 1870 is a very important event in the history of late Qing Dynasty. The Tianjin case involves Western officials in China, Western missionaries in China, Chinese officials, local forces, ordinary people, and other social forces. In order to clarify the reasons behind it, we must analyze the interests of all parties involved in the case from a suitable standpoint, which will lead to different levels of conflict in accordance with the order of priority and importance. This paper combines the two dimensions of time and space, and the research angle is gradually drawn closer: the first part introduces the background factor of the teaching plan in Tianjin, that is, the cultural difference between China and foreign countries. Against the background of history, cultural differences have led to conflicts for thousands of years. When the early Buddhism and Islam were first introduced into China, they also experienced the process of collision, understanding, integration and even assimilation with native culture. When Christianity was formally introduced into China in the early Ming Dynasty, it also conflicted with the traditional Chinese culture, but in terms of quantity and degree of investigation, it could not be compared with the religious cases in the late Qing Dynasty, and some conflicts could not even be counted as teaching cases. It's about culture. Therefore, the author believes that the cultural differences between China and the West do not necessarily lead to the occurrence of teaching plans, but there must be cultural differences behind the occurrence of teaching plans. The second part of this paper draws the angle of view closer to the late Qing Dynasty. From the beginning of the Opium War in 1840, the western capitalist countries began to invade China with the gunboat policy. The author believes that this is the fundamental reason for most of the teaching plans in the late Qing Dynasty. It also includes the Tianjin teaching plan. In the analysis of Tianjin's religious case, it is not difficult to see that this case is not blindly directed at all western countries. At that time, the organizers and the majority of the people took French Catholic missionaries and nuns as the main targets of their anger. Therefore, in addition to the analysis of the aggression of western countries in China during the late Qing Dynasty, the author will also review the policy and background of France's missionary policy to China in the 19th century. France, known as the "eldest daughter of the Catholic Church," has historically been an important country in the Catholic diocese. In the early days of the spread of Christianity in China, France gained many benefits. After the Great Revolution, France lost its traditional superiority in the European continent, and the pace of missionary service slowed obviously. After the Opium War between China and Britain in 1840, Western powers such as Britain, the United States, Germany and other Western powers successively entered China through the gunboat policy. Many gains have been made through a series of unequal treaties. France covets their results and fears that if it does not participate in the invasion of the far East, it will lose the opportunity to become a top power again, making it even more distant from other countries. However, France's share of trade in China was very limited at that time, and the treaty of trade with preferential terms was far less significant to France than to Britain and the United States and other countries. Therefore, France's policy was to strengthen its policy of missionary service to China. Through the infiltration of ideas to gain interest in China. In the third part, the author draws closer to Tianjin City in the late Qing Dynasty. Although many teaching plans in the late Qing Dynasty are related to cultural differences and the aggression of Western powers, the most direct causes of each teaching plan are different. The author believes that in Tianjin's teaching plan, A series of social rumours about French Catholicism are the direct cause of its occurrence. To these hearsay discrimination and analysis, can let us have a deeper understanding of Tianjin teaching case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K256
本文編號(hào)：2315489
[Abstract]:The teaching case of Tianjin broke out in 1870 is a very important event in the history of late Qing Dynasty. The Tianjin case involves Western officials in China, Western missionaries in China, Chinese officials, local forces, ordinary people, and other social forces. In order to clarify the reasons behind it, we must analyze the interests of all parties involved in the case from a suitable standpoint, which will lead to different levels of conflict in accordance with the order of priority and importance. This paper combines the two dimensions of time and space, and the research angle is gradually drawn closer: the first part introduces the background factor of the teaching plan in Tianjin, that is, the cultural difference between China and foreign countries. Against the background of history, cultural differences have led to conflicts for thousands of years. When the early Buddhism and Islam were first introduced into China, they also experienced the process of collision, understanding, integration and even assimilation with native culture. When Christianity was formally introduced into China in the early Ming Dynasty, it also conflicted with the traditional Chinese culture, but in terms of quantity and degree of investigation, it could not be compared with the religious cases in the late Qing Dynasty, and some conflicts could not even be counted as teaching cases. It's about culture. Therefore, the author believes that the cultural differences between China and the West do not necessarily lead to the occurrence of teaching plans, but there must be cultural differences behind the occurrence of teaching plans. The second part of this paper draws the angle of view closer to the late Qing Dynasty. From the beginning of the Opium War in 1840, the western capitalist countries began to invade China with the gunboat policy. The author believes that this is the fundamental reason for most of the teaching plans in the late Qing Dynasty. It also includes the Tianjin teaching plan. In the analysis of Tianjin's religious case, it is not difficult to see that this case is not blindly directed at all western countries. At that time, the organizers and the majority of the people took French Catholic missionaries and nuns as the main targets of their anger. Therefore, in addition to the analysis of the aggression of western countries in China during the late Qing Dynasty, the author will also review the policy and background of France's missionary policy to China in the 19th century. France, known as the "eldest daughter of the Catholic Church," has historically been an important country in the Catholic diocese. In the early days of the spread of Christianity in China, France gained many benefits. After the Great Revolution, France lost its traditional superiority in the European continent, and the pace of missionary service slowed obviously. After the Opium War between China and Britain in 1840, Western powers such as Britain, the United States, Germany and other Western powers successively entered China through the gunboat policy. Many gains have been made through a series of unequal treaties. France covets their results and fears that if it does not participate in the invasion of the far East, it will lose the opportunity to become a top power again, making it even more distant from other countries. However, France's share of trade in China was very limited at that time, and the treaty of trade with preferential terms was far less significant to France than to Britain and the United States and other countries. Therefore, France's policy was to strengthen its policy of missionary service to China. Through the infiltration of ideas to gain interest in China. In the third part, the author draws closer to Tianjin City in the late Qing Dynasty. Although many teaching plans in the late Qing Dynasty are related to cultural differences and the aggression of Western powers, the most direct causes of each teaching plan are different. The author believes that in Tianjin's teaching plan, A series of social rumours about French Catholicism are the direct cause of its occurrence. To these hearsay discrimination and analysis, can let us have a deeper understanding of Tianjin teaching case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K256
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 黃文治;陸發(fā)春;;安慶教案與近代官紳階層研究[J];安慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期
2 常澤鯤,金飛飛;論近代中國(guó)教案發(fā)生的原因[J];北華大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年02期
3 李慧;;丁日昌的外交思想與實(shí)踐——以天津教案為例[J];邊疆經(jīng)濟(jì)與文化;2010年09期
4 鐘鋼;困境中的排教——論劉秉璋經(jīng)辦四川教案的態(tài)度、措施及其影響[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1993年01期
5 趙樹(shù)好;;基督教與近代運(yùn)河流經(jīng)省份習(xí)俗變遷[J];東岳論叢;2009年06期
6 張立勝;張小柳;;從社會(huì)心理角度探究晚清教案發(fā)生的原因[J];德州學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年05期
7 羅萍;;近代西方傳教活動(dòng)與晚清鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)秩序的裂變[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年12期
8 李穎;試析清季臺(tái)灣教案中官紳民的反教原因及其關(guān)系[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期
9 涂鳴皋;對(duì)中國(guó)近代教案研究中幾種觀(guān)點(diǎn)的商榷[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);1993年01期
10 溫欽虎;從近代教案看基督教和中國(guó)社會(huì)習(xí)俗的沖突[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2000年03期
，本文編號(hào)：2315489
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgjxds/2315489.html
教材專(zhuān)著
