【摘要】：從清末到新文化運(yùn)動期間,一些文化人對家族制度的批判,展示出了不同的思想維度和動機(jī)。這些批判敘事大要從兩個維度切入:一是政治的,一是道德的。我們以為,從政治維度切入的批判,一方面展示出在近代國家救亡圖存、政治秩序建設(shè)、個體自覺和文化變革上,傳統(tǒng)家族制度所存在的不適;另一方面也見證了,在文化人的思想變遷上,家族制度的評論和質(zhì)疑起到了接引西方觀念的橋梁作用,進(jìn)而形塑了文化人思想因子發(fā)生發(fā)展的具體情境。從道德維度切入的批判,一方面將對家族制度的認(rèn)識推向了深入,另一方面也讓新舊道德更張的吁求得到了具體的載體�？v觀此期家族制度的敘事,在各個階段,多為各種時勢所裹挾,使得批判也顯現(xiàn)了一定的片面性,尚不足以勾勒出傳統(tǒng)家族制度的全貌。這也給后來者對家庭、家族和家族制度的認(rèn)識留下了思考的空間。
[Abstract]:During the period from the late Qing Dynasty to the New Culture Movement, some intellectuals criticized the family system and showed different ideological dimensions and motives. These critical narratives should be cut into two dimensions: one is political and the other is moral. We think that the criticism from the political dimension, on the one hand, shows the discomfort of the traditional family system in the modern national salvation, political order construction, individual consciousness and cultural change; On the other hand, the comments and questions of the family system play a role as a bridge to attract the western ideas, and then shape the concrete situation of the development of the cultural people's ideological factors. The criticism from the moral dimension, on the one hand, pushes the understanding of the family system deeply, on the other hand, it also makes the appeal of the new and the old morality more open to the concrete carrier. Throughout this period of the narrative of the family system, in each stage, most of them are held hostage by various times, which makes criticism also show certain one-sidedness, which is not enough to outline the whole picture of the traditional family system. This also left room for latecomers to think about family, family and family system.
【作者單位】： 湖南大學(xué)岳麓書院;
【分類號】：K25

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 李卓;;近代中日家庭的縮影——島崎藤村的《家》與巴金的《家》[A];世界近現(xiàn)代史研究（第一輯）[C];2004年

，

本文編號：2299461