【摘要】：戰(zhàn)后,在遠(yuǎn)東地區(qū)各盟國(guó)對(duì)日本乙丙級(jí)戰(zhàn)犯的審判中,國(guó)民政府主導(dǎo)的審判具有一定的特殊性。中國(guó)在太平洋戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)爆發(fā)以前即長(zhǎng)期遭受日本的侵略,所以中國(guó)對(duì)日本戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)罪責(zé)的追究與其他盟國(guó)有很大的差異。中國(guó)法庭,相對(duì)于遠(yuǎn)東地區(qū)由英美等國(guó)主導(dǎo)的法庭及新獨(dú)立國(guó)家的法庭,具有相當(dāng)?shù)闹黧w性。但國(guó)民政府自身能力的限制以及日本侵華戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的特殊性使得審判的效果不盡如人意。國(guó)民政府戰(zhàn)罪調(diào)查工作的嚴(yán)重滯后,直接影響到戰(zhàn)犯懲處的實(shí)效。日本侵華戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的長(zhǎng)期性造成中國(guó)擬追究的戰(zhàn)犯嫌疑人中有相當(dāng)大比例需依靠引渡,但成功引渡的案例非常有限,所以審判的主體局限于日軍現(xiàn)地受降部隊(duì)中的戰(zhàn)犯嫌疑人。
[Abstract]:After the war, in the trial of Japanese war criminals of class B and C in the allies of the far East, the trial led by the national government has its own particularity. China had been invaded by Japan for a long time before the outbreak of the Pacific War, so China's accountability for Japan's war crimes is very different from that of other allies. Chinese courts, compared with those in the far East dominated by Britain and the United States and the courts of newly independent countries, have considerable subjectivity. However, the limitation of national government's own ability and the particularity of Japan's invasion of China made the effect of the trial unsatisfactory. The serious lag in the investigation of war crimes of the National Government directly affects the effectiveness of the punishment of war criminals. The protracted nature of Japan's war of aggression against China has resulted in a considerable proportion of the war criminal suspects to be investigated by China who need to rely on extradition, but the cases of successful extradition are very limited, so the main body of the trial is limited to the war criminal suspects in the Japanese troops in the field.
【作者單位】： 南京師范大學(xué)歷史系、抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重大項(xiàng)目“抗戰(zhàn)勝利后國(guó)民政府對(duì)日本戰(zhàn)犯審判研究”(15ZDB046)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：K266
，

本文編號(hào)：2278041